PunjiPUNJI

COMPARE

ICICI Prudential Exports & Services Fund - Direct Plan - Growth vs LIC MF Infrastructure Fund-Direct Plan-Growth

ICICI Prudential Exports & Services Fund and LIC MF Infrastructure Fund- are both in the Sectoral/ Thematic category, from ICICI Prudential Asset Management Company Limited and LIC Mutual Fund Asset Management Limited respectively. ICICI Prudential Exports & Services Fund has posted a higher 3-year rolling CAGR. LIC MF Infrastructure Fund- has the lower expense ratio. See the full table and FAQ below for the complete real-data comparison.

Basics

LIC MF Infrastructure Fund- has the lower direct-plan expense ratio, by 0.46 percentage points.

ICICI Prudential Exports & Services Fund - Direct Plan - GrowthLIC MF Infrastructure Fund-Direct Plan-Growth
CategorySectoral/ ThematicSectoral/ Thematic
AMCICICI Prudential Asset Management Company LimitedLIC Mutual Fund Asset Management Limited
BenchmarkBSE 500 TRINifty Infrastructure TRI
NAV₹177.43 (2026-10-28)₹59.1519 (2026-10-28)
AUM₹1,435.008 Cr₹1,102.82 Cr
Expense Ratio (Direct)1.79%1.33%
Inception2005-10-132008-01-31

Returns

ICICI Prudential Exports & Services Fund leads on 3-year rolling CAGR (18.7% vs LIC MF Infrastructure Fund-'s 15.6%) - see the FAQ below for percentile context within each fund's own category.

Risk Metrics

LIC MF Infrastructure Fund- has been the more volatile of the two by standard deviation.

Portfolio Analytics

LIC MF Infrastructure Fund- carries the higher portfolio P/E ratio (a rougher proxy for how richly the underlying holdings are valued) - see the table below for the full comparison.

Punji Fund Health Score

ICICI Prudential Exports & Services Fund and LIC MF Infrastructure Fund- carry the same Punji Quality grade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has a higher 3-year return, ICICI Prudential Exports & Services Fund or LIC MF Infrastructure Fund-?

ICICI Prudential Exports & Services Fund's 3-year rolling CAGR of 18.7% is higher than LIC MF Infrastructure Fund-'s 15.6%. ICICI Prudential Exports & Services Fund sits in the 65th percentile of its category on this metric, versus the 34th percentile for LIC MF Infrastructure Fund- - though note both funds may belong to different categories with different medians, so a raw CAGR comparison doesn't account for how each fund performed relative to its own peers. A higher historical return also doesn't necessarily mean lower risk; check the risk metrics below before concluding either fund is the "better" choice.

Which has a lower expense ratio, ICICI Prudential Exports & Services Fund or LIC MF Infrastructure Fund-?

LIC MF Infrastructure Fund-'s direct-plan expense ratio is 0.46 percentage points lower than ICICI Prudential Exports & Services Fund's. Over long holding periods, a persistent expense-ratio gap compounds into a materially different final corpus even if the two funds' gross returns are similar - it's one of the few fund attributes you can compare with total certainty upfront, unlike future returns, since the fee is contractually fixed rather than a historical estimate.

Which fund carries more risk, ICICI Prudential Exports & Services Fund or LIC MF Infrastructure Fund-?

By standard deviation (a measure of how much a fund's returns swing around its own average), LIC MF Infrastructure Fund- has been more volatile than ICICI Prudential Exports & Services Fund over the trailing window. Standard deviation captures total volatility in both directions - up and down - so a higher figure means bigger swings generally, not necessarily bigger losses specifically. Sharpe ratio (0.41 for ICICI Prudential Exports & Services Fund vs 0.58 for LIC MF Infrastructure Fund-) is a better single measure of risk-adjusted return, since it weighs the return earned per unit of volatility taken rather than volatility alone.

Which has higher AUM, ICICI Prudential Exports & Services Fund or LIC MF Infrastructure Fund-?

ICICI Prudential Exports & Services Fund has ₹1,435 Cr in assets under management, versus ₹1,103 Cr for LIC MF Infrastructure Fund-. A larger AUM generally means deeper liquidity and lower per-unit fixed costs for the AMC to spread across investors, but an AUM that's very large relative to a fund's category and strategy (especially in small/mid cap categories, where the investable universe is smaller) can also make it harder for a manager to enter and exit positions without moving the price - bigger isn't automatically better, especially for less liquid categories.

Which fund has a longer track record, ICICI Prudential Exports & Services Fund or LIC MF Infrastructure Fund-?

ICICI Prudential Exports & Services Fund launched on 2005-10-13, making it older than LIC MF Infrastructure Fund- (launched 2008-01-31). A longer track record means more real market cycles (bull runs, corrections, rate cycles) the fund has actually navigated, which is useful context for judging consistency - but it isn't a guarantee of future performance, and a newer fund isn't automatically worse, especially if it's run by an experienced manager or team with a track record at a prior fund.

Data as of 2026-10-29. Source: AMFI disclosures via Punji. Not investment advice.