COMPARE
ICICI Prudential Dividend Yield Fund Direct Plan Growth Option vs UTI-Dividend Yield Fund.-Growth-Direct
ICICI Prudential Dividend Yield Fund and UTI-Dividend Yield Fund.-Growth-Direct are both in the Dividend Yield Fund category, from ICICI Prudential Asset Management Company Limited and UTI Asset Mgmt. Co. Ltd. respectively. ICICI Prudential Dividend Yield Fund has the lower expense ratio. See the full table and FAQ below for the complete real-data comparison.
Basics
ICICI Prudential Dividend Yield Fund has the lower direct-plan expense ratio, by 0.78 percentage points.
| ICICI Prudential Dividend Yield Fund Direct Plan Growth Option | UTI-Dividend Yield Fund.-Growth-Direct | |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Dividend Yield Fund | Dividend Yield Fund |
| AMC | ICICI Prudential Asset Management Company Limited | UTI Asset Mgmt. Co. Ltd. |
| Benchmark | Nifty 500 TRI | Nifty 500 TRI |
| NAV | ₹55.47 (2026-10-30) | ₹182.7713 (2026-10-30) |
| AUM | ₹6,267.217 Cr | ₹3,524.869 Cr |
| Expense Ratio (Direct) | 0.76% | 1.54% |
| Inception | 2014-04-25 | 2005-04-11 |
Returns
Risk Metrics
UTI-Dividend Yield Fund.-Growth-Direct has been the more volatile of the two by standard deviation.
| ICICI Prudential Dividend Yield Fund Direct Plan Growth Option | UTI-Dividend Yield Fund.-Growth-Direct | |
|---|---|---|
| 3Y Sharpe Ratio | 0.45 | 0.38 |
| 3Y Alpha | 4.138% | 3.3225% |
| 3Y Std Deviation | 12.5034% | 12.7273% |
| 3Y Calmar Ratio | 0.80 | 0.65 |
Portfolio Analytics
Punji Fund Health Score
ICICI Prudential Dividend Yield Fund and UTI-Dividend Yield Fund.-Growth-Direct carry the same Punji Quality grade.
Frequently asked questions
Which has a lower expense ratio, ICICI Prudential Dividend Yield Fund or UTI-Dividend Yield Fund.-Growth-Direct?
ICICI Prudential Dividend Yield Fund's direct-plan expense ratio is 0.78 percentage points lower than UTI-Dividend Yield Fund.-Growth-Direct's. Over long holding periods, a persistent expense-ratio gap compounds into a materially different final corpus even if the two funds' gross returns are similar - it's one of the few fund attributes you can compare with total certainty upfront, unlike future returns, since the fee is contractually fixed rather than a historical estimate.
Which fund carries more risk, ICICI Prudential Dividend Yield Fund or UTI-Dividend Yield Fund.-Growth-Direct?
By standard deviation (a measure of how much a fund's returns swing around its own average), UTI-Dividend Yield Fund.-Growth-Direct has been more volatile than ICICI Prudential Dividend Yield Fund over the trailing window. Standard deviation captures total volatility in both directions - up and down - so a higher figure means bigger swings generally, not necessarily bigger losses specifically. Sharpe ratio (0.45 for ICICI Prudential Dividend Yield Fund vs 0.38 for UTI-Dividend Yield Fund.-Growth-Direct) is a better single measure of risk-adjusted return, since it weighs the return earned per unit of volatility taken rather than volatility alone.
Which has higher AUM, ICICI Prudential Dividend Yield Fund or UTI-Dividend Yield Fund.-Growth-Direct?
ICICI Prudential Dividend Yield Fund has ₹6,267 Cr in assets under management, versus ₹3,525 Cr for UTI-Dividend Yield Fund.-Growth-Direct. A larger AUM generally means deeper liquidity and lower per-unit fixed costs for the AMC to spread across investors, but an AUM that's very large relative to a fund's category and strategy (especially in small/mid cap categories, where the investable universe is smaller) can also make it harder for a manager to enter and exit positions without moving the price - bigger isn't automatically better, especially for less liquid categories.
Which fund has a longer track record, ICICI Prudential Dividend Yield Fund or UTI-Dividend Yield Fund.-Growth-Direct?
UTI-Dividend Yield Fund.-Growth-Direct launched on 2005-04-11, making it older than ICICI Prudential Dividend Yield Fund (launched 2014-04-25). A longer track record means more real market cycles (bull runs, corrections, rate cycles) the fund has actually navigated, which is useful context for judging consistency - but it isn't a guarantee of future performance, and a newer fund isn't automatically worse, especially if it's run by an experienced manager or team with a track record at a prior fund.
Data as of 2026-11-01. Source: AMFI disclosures via Punji. Not investment advice.