COMPARE
ICICI Prudential Dividend Yield Fund Direct Plan Growth Option vs Kotak Dividend Yield Fund - Direct - Growth
ICICI Prudential Dividend Yield Fund and Kotak Dividend Yield Fund are both in the Dividend Yield Fund category, from ICICI Prudential Asset Management Company Limited and Kotak Mahindra Asset Management Company Limited. respectively. ICICI Prudential Dividend Yield Fund has the lower expense ratio. See the full table and FAQ below for the complete real-data comparison.
Basics
ICICI Prudential Dividend Yield Fund has the lower direct-plan expense ratio, by 0.34 percentage points.
| ICICI Prudential Dividend Yield Fund Direct Plan Growth Option | Kotak Dividend Yield Fund - Direct - Growth | |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Dividend Yield Fund | Dividend Yield Fund |
| AMC | ICICI Prudential Asset Management Company Limited | Kotak Mahindra Asset Management Company Limited. |
| Benchmark | Nifty 500 TRI | Nifty 500 TRI |
| NAV | ₹55.47 (2026-10-30) | ₹9.183 (2026-10-30) |
| AUM | ₹6,267.217 Cr | ₹272.402 Cr |
| Expense Ratio (Direct) | 0.76% | 1.1% |
| Inception | 2014-04-25 | 2026-01-05 |
Returns
This fund is less than a year old, so there is not yet enough history to calculate rolling returns.
Risk Metrics
This fund is less than three years old, so a three-year risk history does not exist yet.
Portfolio Analytics
| ICICI Prudential Dividend Yield Fund Direct Plan Growth Option | Kotak Dividend Yield Fund - Direct - Growth | |
|---|---|---|
| P/E Ratio | - | 19.1534 |
| P/B Ratio | - | 3.9367 |
| Dividend Yield | 1.55% | 1.4737% |
| Active Share | - | 56.65% |
| Portfolio Turnover | 49% | 411.00000000000006% |
| YTM | 5.3948% | - |
| Duration (Macaulay) | - | - |
Punji Fund Health Score
ICICI Prudential Dividend Yield Fund and Kotak Dividend Yield Fund carry the same Punji Quality grade.
Frequently asked questions
Which has a lower expense ratio, ICICI Prudential Dividend Yield Fund or Kotak Dividend Yield Fund?
ICICI Prudential Dividend Yield Fund's direct-plan expense ratio is 0.34 percentage points lower than Kotak Dividend Yield Fund's. Over long holding periods, a persistent expense-ratio gap compounds into a materially different final corpus even if the two funds' gross returns are similar - it's one of the few fund attributes you can compare with total certainty upfront, unlike future returns, since the fee is contractually fixed rather than a historical estimate.
Why don't ICICI Prudential Dividend Yield Fund and Kotak Dividend Yield Fund show risk metrics like Sharpe ratio or alpha?
This fund is less than three years old, so a three-year risk history does not exist yet. This is a deliberate methodology choice, not missing data - risk metrics like alpha and Sharpe ratio are most meaningful for actively-managed funds where a manager makes decisions that can add or subtract value versus a benchmark. For a fund that mechanically tracks an index, the equivalent useful metric is tracking error (how closely it follows its index), not alpha.
Which has higher AUM, ICICI Prudential Dividend Yield Fund or Kotak Dividend Yield Fund?
ICICI Prudential Dividend Yield Fund has ₹6,267 Cr in assets under management, versus ₹272 Cr for Kotak Dividend Yield Fund. A larger AUM generally means deeper liquidity and lower per-unit fixed costs for the AMC to spread across investors, but an AUM that's very large relative to a fund's category and strategy (especially in small/mid cap categories, where the investable universe is smaller) can also make it harder for a manager to enter and exit positions without moving the price - bigger isn't automatically better, especially for less liquid categories.
Which fund has a longer track record, ICICI Prudential Dividend Yield Fund or Kotak Dividend Yield Fund?
ICICI Prudential Dividend Yield Fund launched on 2014-04-25, making it older than Kotak Dividend Yield Fund (launched 2026-01-05). A longer track record means more real market cycles (bull runs, corrections, rate cycles) the fund has actually navigated, which is useful context for judging consistency - but it isn't a guarantee of future performance, and a newer fund isn't automatically worse, especially if it's run by an experienced manager or team with a track record at a prior fund.
Data as of 2026-11-01. Source: AMFI disclosures via Punji. Not investment advice.