COMPARE
ICICI Prudential Aggressive Hybrid Fund - Direct Plan - Growth vs Shriram Aggressive Hybrid Fund- Direct Growth
ICICI Prudential Aggressive Hybrid Fund and Shriram Aggressive Hybrid Fund- Direct Growth are both in the Aggressive Hybrid Fund category, from ICICI Prudential Asset Management Company Limited and Shriram Asset Management Co. Ltd. respectively. ICICI Prudential Aggressive Hybrid Fund has posted a higher 3-year rolling CAGR. Shriram Aggressive Hybrid Fund- Direct Growth has the lower expense ratio. See the full table and FAQ below for the complete real-data comparison.
Basics
Shriram Aggressive Hybrid Fund- Direct Growth has the lower direct-plan expense ratio, by 0.21 percentage points.
| ICICI Prudential Aggressive Hybrid Fund - Direct Plan - Growth | Shriram Aggressive Hybrid Fund- Direct Growth | |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Aggressive Hybrid Fund | Aggressive Hybrid Fund |
| AMC | ICICI Prudential Asset Management Company Limited | Shriram Asset Management Co. Ltd. |
| Benchmark | CRISIL Hybrid 35+65 - Aggressive Index | CRISIL Hybrid 35+65 - Aggressive Index |
| NAV | ₹430.83 (2026-10-28) | ₹35.6304 (2026-10-28) |
| AUM | ₹49,689.25 Cr | ₹49.319 Cr |
| Expense Ratio (Direct) | 1.07% | 0.86% |
| Inception | 2000-01-01 | 2013-11-08 |
Returns
ICICI Prudential Aggressive Hybrid Fund leads on 3-year rolling CAGR (18.2% vs Shriram Aggressive Hybrid Fund- Direct Growth's 11.2%) - see the FAQ below for percentile context within each fund's own category.
Risk Metrics
Shriram Aggressive Hybrid Fund- Direct Growth has been the more volatile of the two by standard deviation.
| ICICI Prudential Aggressive Hybrid Fund - Direct Plan - Growth | Shriram Aggressive Hybrid Fund- Direct Growth | |
|---|---|---|
| 3Y Sharpe Ratio | 0.41 | 0.06 |
| 3Y Alpha | 3.3315% | -0.0274% |
| 3Y Std Deviation | 9.6806% | 10.4466% |
| 3Y Calmar Ratio | 0.99 | 0.48 |
Portfolio Analytics
Punji Fund Health Score
ICICI Prudential Aggressive Hybrid Fund has the stronger Punji Quality grade of the two.
Frequently asked questions
Which has a higher 3-year return, ICICI Prudential Aggressive Hybrid Fund or Shriram Aggressive Hybrid Fund- Direct Growth?
ICICI Prudential Aggressive Hybrid Fund's 3-year rolling CAGR of 18.2% is higher than Shriram Aggressive Hybrid Fund- Direct Growth's 11.2%. ICICI Prudential Aggressive Hybrid Fund sits in the 93rd percentile of its category on this metric, versus the 7th percentile for Shriram Aggressive Hybrid Fund- Direct Growth - though note both funds may belong to different categories with different medians, so a raw CAGR comparison doesn't account for how each fund performed relative to its own peers. A higher historical return also doesn't necessarily mean lower risk; check the risk metrics below before concluding either fund is the "better" choice.
Which has a lower expense ratio, ICICI Prudential Aggressive Hybrid Fund or Shriram Aggressive Hybrid Fund- Direct Growth?
Shriram Aggressive Hybrid Fund- Direct Growth's direct-plan expense ratio is 0.21 percentage points lower than ICICI Prudential Aggressive Hybrid Fund's. Over long holding periods, a persistent expense-ratio gap compounds into a materially different final corpus even if the two funds' gross returns are similar - it's one of the few fund attributes you can compare with total certainty upfront, unlike future returns, since the fee is contractually fixed rather than a historical estimate.
Which fund carries more risk, ICICI Prudential Aggressive Hybrid Fund or Shriram Aggressive Hybrid Fund- Direct Growth?
By standard deviation (a measure of how much a fund's returns swing around its own average), Shriram Aggressive Hybrid Fund- Direct Growth has been more volatile than ICICI Prudential Aggressive Hybrid Fund over the trailing window. Standard deviation captures total volatility in both directions - up and down - so a higher figure means bigger swings generally, not necessarily bigger losses specifically. Sharpe ratio (0.41 for ICICI Prudential Aggressive Hybrid Fund vs 0.06 for Shriram Aggressive Hybrid Fund- Direct Growth) is a better single measure of risk-adjusted return, since it weighs the return earned per unit of volatility taken rather than volatility alone.
Which has higher AUM, ICICI Prudential Aggressive Hybrid Fund or Shriram Aggressive Hybrid Fund- Direct Growth?
ICICI Prudential Aggressive Hybrid Fund has ₹49,689 Cr in assets under management, versus ₹49 Cr for Shriram Aggressive Hybrid Fund- Direct Growth. A larger AUM generally means deeper liquidity and lower per-unit fixed costs for the AMC to spread across investors, but an AUM that's very large relative to a fund's category and strategy (especially in small/mid cap categories, where the investable universe is smaller) can also make it harder for a manager to enter and exit positions without moving the price - bigger isn't automatically better, especially for less liquid categories.
Which fund has a longer track record, ICICI Prudential Aggressive Hybrid Fund or Shriram Aggressive Hybrid Fund- Direct Growth?
ICICI Prudential Aggressive Hybrid Fund launched on 2000-01-01, making it older than Shriram Aggressive Hybrid Fund- Direct Growth (launched 2013-11-08). A longer track record means more real market cycles (bull runs, corrections, rate cycles) the fund has actually navigated, which is useful context for judging consistency - but it isn't a guarantee of future performance, and a newer fund isn't automatically worse, especially if it's run by an experienced manager or team with a track record at a prior fund.
Data as of 2026-10-29. Source: AMFI disclosures via Punji. Not investment advice.