COMPARE
ICICI Prudential Aggressive Hybrid Fund - Direct Plan - Growth vs SBI AGGRESIVE HYBRID FUND - DIRECT PLAN - Growth
ICICI Prudential Aggressive Hybrid Fund and SBI AGGRESIVE HYBRID FUND are both in the Aggressive Hybrid Fund category, from ICICI Prudential Asset Management Company Limited and SBI Funds Management Limited respectively. ICICI Prudential Aggressive Hybrid Fund has posted a higher 3-year rolling CAGR. SBI AGGRESIVE HYBRID FUND has the lower expense ratio. See the full table and FAQ below for the complete real-data comparison.
Basics
SBI AGGRESIVE HYBRID FUND has the lower direct-plan expense ratio, by 0.31 percentage points.
| ICICI Prudential Aggressive Hybrid Fund - Direct Plan - Growth | SBI AGGRESIVE HYBRID FUND - DIRECT PLAN - Growth | |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Aggressive Hybrid Fund | Aggressive Hybrid Fund |
| AMC | ICICI Prudential Asset Management Company Limited | SBI Funds Management Limited |
| Benchmark | CRISIL Hybrid 35+65 - Aggressive Index | CRISIL Hybrid 35+65 - Aggressive Index |
| NAV | ₹430.83 (2026-10-28) | ₹335.7005 (2026-10-28) |
| AUM | ₹49,689.25 Cr | ₹84,914.41 Cr |
| Expense Ratio (Direct) | 1.07% | 0.76% |
| Inception | 2000-01-01 | 2005-01-01 |
Returns
ICICI Prudential Aggressive Hybrid Fund leads on 3-year rolling CAGR (18.2% vs SBI AGGRESIVE HYBRID FUND's 14.0%) - see the FAQ below for percentile context within each fund's own category.
Risk Metrics
ICICI Prudential Aggressive Hybrid Fund has been the more volatile of the two by standard deviation.
| ICICI Prudential Aggressive Hybrid Fund - Direct Plan - Growth | SBI AGGRESIVE HYBRID FUND - DIRECT PLAN - Growth | |
|---|---|---|
| 3Y Sharpe Ratio | 0.41 | 0.32 |
| 3Y Alpha | 3.3315% | 2.4024% |
| 3Y Std Deviation | 9.6806% | 9.4234% |
| 3Y Calmar Ratio | 0.99 | 1.02 |
Portfolio Analytics
SBI AGGRESIVE HYBRID FUND carries the higher portfolio YTM.
| ICICI Prudential Aggressive Hybrid Fund - Direct Plan - Growth | SBI AGGRESIVE HYBRID FUND - DIRECT PLAN - Growth | |
|---|---|---|
| P/E Ratio | - | 23.908 |
| P/B Ratio | - | 6.656 |
| Dividend Yield | - | 0.9402% |
| Active Share | - | - |
| Portfolio Turnover | - | 361% |
| YTM | 8.0269% | 8.3656% |
| Duration (Macaulay) | - | 4.9 yrs |
Punji Fund Health Score
ICICI Prudential Aggressive Hybrid Fund has the stronger Punji Quality grade of the two.
Frequently asked questions
Which has a higher 3-year return, ICICI Prudential Aggressive Hybrid Fund or SBI AGGRESIVE HYBRID FUND?
ICICI Prudential Aggressive Hybrid Fund's 3-year rolling CAGR of 18.2% is higher than SBI AGGRESIVE HYBRID FUND's 14.0%. ICICI Prudential Aggressive Hybrid Fund sits in the 93rd percentile of its category on this metric, versus the 38th percentile for SBI AGGRESIVE HYBRID FUND - though note both funds may belong to different categories with different medians, so a raw CAGR comparison doesn't account for how each fund performed relative to its own peers. A higher historical return also doesn't necessarily mean lower risk; check the risk metrics below before concluding either fund is the "better" choice.
Which has a lower expense ratio, ICICI Prudential Aggressive Hybrid Fund or SBI AGGRESIVE HYBRID FUND?
SBI AGGRESIVE HYBRID FUND's direct-plan expense ratio is 0.31 percentage points lower than ICICI Prudential Aggressive Hybrid Fund's. Over long holding periods, a persistent expense-ratio gap compounds into a materially different final corpus even if the two funds' gross returns are similar - it's one of the few fund attributes you can compare with total certainty upfront, unlike future returns, since the fee is contractually fixed rather than a historical estimate.
Which fund carries more risk, ICICI Prudential Aggressive Hybrid Fund or SBI AGGRESIVE HYBRID FUND?
By standard deviation (a measure of how much a fund's returns swing around its own average), ICICI Prudential Aggressive Hybrid Fund has been more volatile than SBI AGGRESIVE HYBRID FUND over the trailing window. Standard deviation captures total volatility in both directions - up and down - so a higher figure means bigger swings generally, not necessarily bigger losses specifically. Sharpe ratio (0.41 for ICICI Prudential Aggressive Hybrid Fund vs 0.32 for SBI AGGRESIVE HYBRID FUND) is a better single measure of risk-adjusted return, since it weighs the return earned per unit of volatility taken rather than volatility alone.
Which has higher AUM, ICICI Prudential Aggressive Hybrid Fund or SBI AGGRESIVE HYBRID FUND?
SBI AGGRESIVE HYBRID FUND has ₹84,914 Cr in assets under management, versus ₹49,689 Cr for ICICI Prudential Aggressive Hybrid Fund. A larger AUM generally means deeper liquidity and lower per-unit fixed costs for the AMC to spread across investors, but an AUM that's very large relative to a fund's category and strategy (especially in small/mid cap categories, where the investable universe is smaller) can also make it harder for a manager to enter and exit positions without moving the price - bigger isn't automatically better, especially for less liquid categories.
Which has a higher yield to maturity (YTM), ICICI Prudential Aggressive Hybrid Fund or SBI AGGRESIVE HYBRID FUND?
SBI AGGRESIVE HYBRID FUND's portfolio YTM (8.3656%) is higher than ICICI Prudential Aggressive Hybrid Fund's. YTM is the weighted-average return a debt fund's current bond holdings would earn if held to maturity, assuming no defaults and coupons reinvested at the same rate - a useful forward-looking yield estimate for debt funds the way rolling CAGR is for equity funds, though it's an estimate based on today's portfolio, not a guaranteed return, and can move as bonds are bought/sold or as interest rates change.
Which fund has a longer track record, ICICI Prudential Aggressive Hybrid Fund or SBI AGGRESIVE HYBRID FUND?
ICICI Prudential Aggressive Hybrid Fund launched on 2000-01-01, making it older than SBI AGGRESIVE HYBRID FUND (launched 2005-01-01). A longer track record means more real market cycles (bull runs, corrections, rate cycles) the fund has actually navigated, which is useful context for judging consistency - but it isn't a guarantee of future performance, and a newer fund isn't automatically worse, especially if it's run by an experienced manager or team with a track record at a prior fund.
Data as of 2026-10-29. Source: AMFI disclosures via Punji. Not investment advice.