PunjiPUNJI

COMPARE

ICICI Prudential Aggressive Hybrid Fund - Direct Plan - Growth vs quant Aggressive Hybrid Fund-Growth Option-Direct Plan

ICICI Prudential Aggressive Hybrid Fund and quant Aggressive Hybrid Fund- are both in the Aggressive Hybrid Fund category, from ICICI Prudential Asset Management Company Limited and quant Money Managers Limited respectively. ICICI Prudential Aggressive Hybrid Fund has posted a higher 3-year rolling CAGR. ICICI Prudential Aggressive Hybrid Fund has the lower expense ratio. See the full table and FAQ below for the complete real-data comparison.

Basics

ICICI Prudential Aggressive Hybrid Fund has the lower direct-plan expense ratio, by 0.37 percentage points.

ICICI Prudential Aggressive Hybrid Fund - Direct Plan - Growthquant Aggressive Hybrid Fund-Growth Option-Direct Plan
CategoryAggressive Hybrid FundAggressive Hybrid Fund
AMCICICI Prudential Asset Management Company Limitedquant Money Managers Limited
BenchmarkCRISIL Hybrid 35+65 - Aggressive IndexNIFTY 50 Hybrid Composite Debt 65:35 Index TRI
NAV₹430.83 (2026-10-28)₹485.1929 (2026-10-28)
AUM₹49,689.25 Cr₹2,048.692 Cr
Expense Ratio (Direct)1.07%1.44%
Inception2000-01-012001-02-19

Returns

ICICI Prudential Aggressive Hybrid Fund leads on 3-year rolling CAGR (18.2% vs quant Aggressive Hybrid Fund-'s 16.2%) - see the FAQ below for percentile context within each fund's own category.

Risk Metrics

quant Aggressive Hybrid Fund- has been the more volatile of the two by standard deviation.

Portfolio Analytics

ICICI Prudential Aggressive Hybrid Fund carries the higher portfolio YTM.

Punji Fund Health Score

ICICI Prudential Aggressive Hybrid Fund and quant Aggressive Hybrid Fund- carry the same Punji Quality grade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has a higher 3-year return, ICICI Prudential Aggressive Hybrid Fund or quant Aggressive Hybrid Fund-?

ICICI Prudential Aggressive Hybrid Fund's 3-year rolling CAGR of 18.2% is higher than quant Aggressive Hybrid Fund-'s 16.2%. ICICI Prudential Aggressive Hybrid Fund sits in the 93rd percentile of its category on this metric, versus the 90th percentile for quant Aggressive Hybrid Fund- - though note both funds may belong to different categories with different medians, so a raw CAGR comparison doesn't account for how each fund performed relative to its own peers. A higher historical return also doesn't necessarily mean lower risk; check the risk metrics below before concluding either fund is the "better" choice.

Which has a lower expense ratio, ICICI Prudential Aggressive Hybrid Fund or quant Aggressive Hybrid Fund-?

ICICI Prudential Aggressive Hybrid Fund's direct-plan expense ratio is 0.37 percentage points lower than quant Aggressive Hybrid Fund-'s. Over long holding periods, a persistent expense-ratio gap compounds into a materially different final corpus even if the two funds' gross returns are similar - it's one of the few fund attributes you can compare with total certainty upfront, unlike future returns, since the fee is contractually fixed rather than a historical estimate.

Which fund carries more risk, ICICI Prudential Aggressive Hybrid Fund or quant Aggressive Hybrid Fund-?

By standard deviation (a measure of how much a fund's returns swing around its own average), quant Aggressive Hybrid Fund- has been more volatile than ICICI Prudential Aggressive Hybrid Fund over the trailing window. Standard deviation captures total volatility in both directions - up and down - so a higher figure means bigger swings generally, not necessarily bigger losses specifically. Sharpe ratio (0.41 for ICICI Prudential Aggressive Hybrid Fund vs 0.31 for quant Aggressive Hybrid Fund-) is a better single measure of risk-adjusted return, since it weighs the return earned per unit of volatility taken rather than volatility alone.

Which has higher AUM, ICICI Prudential Aggressive Hybrid Fund or quant Aggressive Hybrid Fund-?

ICICI Prudential Aggressive Hybrid Fund has ₹49,689 Cr in assets under management, versus ₹2,049 Cr for quant Aggressive Hybrid Fund-. A larger AUM generally means deeper liquidity and lower per-unit fixed costs for the AMC to spread across investors, but an AUM that's very large relative to a fund's category and strategy (especially in small/mid cap categories, where the investable universe is smaller) can also make it harder for a manager to enter and exit positions without moving the price - bigger isn't automatically better, especially for less liquid categories.

Which has a higher yield to maturity (YTM), ICICI Prudential Aggressive Hybrid Fund or quant Aggressive Hybrid Fund-?

ICICI Prudential Aggressive Hybrid Fund's portfolio YTM (8.0269%) is higher than quant Aggressive Hybrid Fund-'s. YTM is the weighted-average return a debt fund's current bond holdings would earn if held to maturity, assuming no defaults and coupons reinvested at the same rate - a useful forward-looking yield estimate for debt funds the way rolling CAGR is for equity funds, though it's an estimate based on today's portfolio, not a guaranteed return, and can move as bonds are bought/sold or as interest rates change.

Which fund has a longer track record, ICICI Prudential Aggressive Hybrid Fund or quant Aggressive Hybrid Fund-?

ICICI Prudential Aggressive Hybrid Fund launched on 2000-01-01, making it older than quant Aggressive Hybrid Fund- (launched 2001-02-19). A longer track record means more real market cycles (bull runs, corrections, rate cycles) the fund has actually navigated, which is useful context for judging consistency - but it isn't a guarantee of future performance, and a newer fund isn't automatically worse, especially if it's run by an experienced manager or team with a track record at a prior fund.

Data as of 2026-10-29. Source: AMFI disclosures via Punji. Not investment advice.