COMPARE
HSBC Value Fund - Direct Growth vs Quant Value Fund - Growth Option - Direct Plan
HSBC Value Fund and Quant Value Fund are both in the Value Fund category, from HSBC Asset Management (India) Private Ltd. and quant Money Managers Limited respectively. Quant Value Fund has posted a higher 3-year rolling CAGR. HSBC Value Fund has the lower expense ratio. See the full table and FAQ below for the complete real-data comparison.
Basics
HSBC Value Fund has the lower direct-plan expense ratio, by 0.02 percentage points.
| HSBC Value Fund - Direct Growth | Quant Value Fund - Growth Option - Direct Plan | |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Value Fund | Value Fund |
| AMC | HSBC Asset Management (India) Private Ltd. | quant Money Managers Limited |
| Benchmark | Nifty 500 TRI | Nifty 500 TRI |
| NAV | ₹120.1952 (2026-10-28) | ₹21.8852 (2026-10-28) |
| AUM | ₹14,407.305 Cr | ₹1,852.124 Cr |
| Expense Ratio (Direct) | 0.89% | 0.91% |
| Inception | 2009-11-16 | 2021-11-10 |
Returns
Quant Value Fund leads on 3-year rolling CAGR (23.3% vs HSBC Value Fund's 22.3%) - see the FAQ below for percentile context within each fund's own category.
Risk Metrics
Quant Value Fund has been the more volatile of the two by standard deviation.
| HSBC Value Fund - Direct Growth | Quant Value Fund - Growth Option - Direct Plan | |
|---|---|---|
| 3Y Sharpe Ratio | 0.35 | 0.49 |
| 3Y Alpha | 4.2812% | 7.7462% |
| 3Y Std Deviation | 16.0544% | 18.442% |
| 3Y Calmar Ratio | 0.64 | 0.67 |
Portfolio Analytics
Quant Value Fund carries the higher portfolio P/E ratio (a rougher proxy for how richly the underlying holdings are valued) - see the table below for the full comparison.
| HSBC Value Fund - Direct Growth | Quant Value Fund - Growth Option - Direct Plan | |
|---|---|---|
| P/E Ratio | 19.0787 | 25.2741 |
| P/B Ratio | - | - |
| Dividend Yield | 1.2724% | 0.8064% |
| Active Share | 66.23% | 96.8% |
| Portfolio Turnover | 34% | - |
| YTM | - | 5.3293% |
| Duration (Macaulay) | - | - |
Punji Fund Health Score
HSBC Value Fund and Quant Value Fund carry the same Punji Quality grade.
Frequently asked questions
Which has a higher 3-year return, HSBC Value Fund or Quant Value Fund?
Quant Value Fund's 3-year rolling CAGR of 23.3% is higher than HSBC Value Fund's 22.3%. Quant Value Fund sits in the 100th percentile of its category on this metric, versus the 90th percentile for HSBC Value Fund - though note both funds may belong to different categories with different medians, so a raw CAGR comparison doesn't account for how each fund performed relative to its own peers. A higher historical return also doesn't necessarily mean lower risk; check the risk metrics below before concluding either fund is the "better" choice.
Which has a lower expense ratio, HSBC Value Fund or Quant Value Fund?
HSBC Value Fund's direct-plan expense ratio is 0.02 percentage points lower than Quant Value Fund's. Over long holding periods, a persistent expense-ratio gap compounds into a materially different final corpus even if the two funds' gross returns are similar - it's one of the few fund attributes you can compare with total certainty upfront, unlike future returns, since the fee is contractually fixed rather than a historical estimate.
Which fund carries more risk, HSBC Value Fund or Quant Value Fund?
By standard deviation (a measure of how much a fund's returns swing around its own average), Quant Value Fund has been more volatile than HSBC Value Fund over the trailing window. Standard deviation captures total volatility in both directions - up and down - so a higher figure means bigger swings generally, not necessarily bigger losses specifically. Sharpe ratio (0.35 for HSBC Value Fund vs 0.49 for Quant Value Fund) is a better single measure of risk-adjusted return, since it weighs the return earned per unit of volatility taken rather than volatility alone.
Which has higher AUM, HSBC Value Fund or Quant Value Fund?
HSBC Value Fund has ₹14,407 Cr in assets under management, versus ₹1,852 Cr for Quant Value Fund. A larger AUM generally means deeper liquidity and lower per-unit fixed costs for the AMC to spread across investors, but an AUM that's very large relative to a fund's category and strategy (especially in small/mid cap categories, where the investable universe is smaller) can also make it harder for a manager to enter and exit positions without moving the price - bigger isn't automatically better, especially for less liquid categories.
Which fund has a longer track record, HSBC Value Fund or Quant Value Fund?
HSBC Value Fund launched on 2009-11-16, making it older than Quant Value Fund (launched 2021-11-10). A longer track record means more real market cycles (bull runs, corrections, rate cycles) the fund has actually navigated, which is useful context for judging consistency - but it isn't a guarantee of future performance, and a newer fund isn't automatically worse, especially if it's run by an experienced manager or team with a track record at a prior fund.
Data as of 2026-10-29. Source: AMFI disclosures via Punji. Not investment advice.