COMPARE
HSBC Midcap Fund - Direct Growth vs Trustmf Mid Cap Fund -direct -growth
HSBC Midcap Fund and Trustmf Mid Cap Fund -direct -growth are both in the Mid Cap Fund category, from HSBC Asset Management (India) Private Ltd. and Trust Asset Management Private Limited respectively. HSBC Midcap Fund has the lower expense ratio. See the full table and FAQ below for the complete real-data comparison.
Basics
HSBC Midcap Fund has the lower direct-plan expense ratio, by 0.75 percentage points.
| HSBC Midcap Fund - Direct Growth | Trustmf Mid Cap Fund -direct -growth | |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Mid Cap Fund | Mid Cap Fund |
| AMC | HSBC Asset Management (India) Private Ltd. | Trust Asset Management Private Limited |
| Benchmark | Nifty Midcap 150 TRI | Nifty Midcap 150 TRI |
| NAV | ₹502.9783 (2026-10-28) | ₹11.42 (2026-10-28) |
| AUM | ₹16,372.657 Cr | ₹706.76 Cr |
| Expense Ratio (Direct) | 1.15% | 1.9% |
| Inception | 2004-06-24 | 2026-02-27 |
Returns
This fund is less than a year old, so there is not yet enough history to calculate rolling returns.
Risk Metrics
This fund is less than three years old, so a three-year risk history does not exist yet.
| HSBC Midcap Fund - Direct Growth | Trustmf Mid Cap Fund -direct -growth | |
|---|---|---|
| 3Y Sharpe Ratio | 0.63 | N/A |
| 3Y Alpha | 7.6777% | N/A |
| 3Y Std Deviation | 18.8795% | N/A |
| 3Y Calmar Ratio | 0.73 | N/A |
Portfolio Analytics
Trustmf Mid Cap Fund -direct -growth carries the higher portfolio P/E ratio (a rougher proxy for how richly the underlying holdings are valued) - see the table below for the full comparison.
| HSBC Midcap Fund - Direct Growth | Trustmf Mid Cap Fund -direct -growth | |
|---|---|---|
| P/E Ratio | 42.3761 | 44.1374 |
| P/B Ratio | - | - |
| Dividend Yield | 0.4829% | 0.3044% |
| Active Share | 73.25% | 63.71% |
| Portfolio Turnover | 129% | - |
| YTM | - | - |
| Duration (Macaulay) | - | - |
Punji Fund Health Score
Trustmf Mid Cap Fund -direct -growth has the stronger Punji Quality grade of the two.
Frequently asked questions
Which has a lower expense ratio, HSBC Midcap Fund or Trustmf Mid Cap Fund -direct -growth?
HSBC Midcap Fund's direct-plan expense ratio is 0.75 percentage points lower than Trustmf Mid Cap Fund -direct -growth's. Over long holding periods, a persistent expense-ratio gap compounds into a materially different final corpus even if the two funds' gross returns are similar - it's one of the few fund attributes you can compare with total certainty upfront, unlike future returns, since the fee is contractually fixed rather than a historical estimate.
Why don't HSBC Midcap Fund and Trustmf Mid Cap Fund -direct -growth show risk metrics like Sharpe ratio or alpha?
This fund is less than three years old, so a three-year risk history does not exist yet. This is a deliberate methodology choice, not missing data - risk metrics like alpha and Sharpe ratio are most meaningful for actively-managed funds where a manager makes decisions that can add or subtract value versus a benchmark. For a fund that mechanically tracks an index, the equivalent useful metric is tracking error (how closely it follows its index), not alpha.
Which has higher AUM, HSBC Midcap Fund or Trustmf Mid Cap Fund -direct -growth?
HSBC Midcap Fund has ₹16,373 Cr in assets under management, versus ₹707 Cr for Trustmf Mid Cap Fund -direct -growth. A larger AUM generally means deeper liquidity and lower per-unit fixed costs for the AMC to spread across investors, but an AUM that's very large relative to a fund's category and strategy (especially in small/mid cap categories, where the investable universe is smaller) can also make it harder for a manager to enter and exit positions without moving the price - bigger isn't automatically better, especially for less liquid categories.
Which fund has a longer track record, HSBC Midcap Fund or Trustmf Mid Cap Fund -direct -growth?
HSBC Midcap Fund launched on 2004-06-24, making it older than Trustmf Mid Cap Fund -direct -growth (launched 2026-02-27). A longer track record means more real market cycles (bull runs, corrections, rate cycles) the fund has actually navigated, which is useful context for judging consistency - but it isn't a guarantee of future performance, and a newer fund isn't automatically worse, especially if it's run by an experienced manager or team with a track record at a prior fund.
Data as of 2026-10-29. Source: AMFI disclosures via Punji. Not investment advice.