COMPARE
HSBC Large & Mid Cap Fund - Direct Growth vs PGIM India Large and Midcap Fund - Direct Plan - Growth Option
HSBC Large & Mid Cap Fund and PGIM India Large and Midcap Fund are both in the Large & Mid Cap Fund category, from HSBC Asset Management (India) Private Ltd. and PGIM India Asset Management Private Limite respectively. PGIM India Large and Midcap Fund has the lower expense ratio. See the full table and FAQ below for the complete real-data comparison.
Basics
PGIM India Large and Midcap Fund has the lower direct-plan expense ratio, by 0.50 percentage points.
| HSBC Large & Mid Cap Fund - Direct Growth | PGIM India Large and Midcap Fund - Direct Plan - Growth Option | |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Large & Mid Cap Fund | Large & Mid Cap Fund |
| AMC | HSBC Asset Management (India) Private Ltd. | PGIM India Asset Management Private Limite |
| Benchmark | NIFTY LargeMidcap 250 TRI | NIFTY LargeMidcap 250 TRI |
| NAV | ₹31.3878 (2026-10-28) | ₹12.48 (2026-10-28) |
| AUM | ₹5,679.217 Cr | ₹762.442 Cr |
| Expense Ratio (Direct) | 1.39% | 0.89% |
| Inception | 2019-03-11 | 2024-01-24 |
Returns
Risk Metrics
This fund is less than three years old, so a three-year risk history does not exist yet.
Portfolio Analytics
HSBC Large & Mid Cap Fund carries the higher portfolio P/E ratio (a rougher proxy for how richly the underlying holdings are valued) - see the table below for the full comparison.
| HSBC Large & Mid Cap Fund - Direct Growth | PGIM India Large and Midcap Fund - Direct Plan - Growth Option | |
|---|---|---|
| P/E Ratio | 34.4332 | 28.1318 |
| P/B Ratio | 15.3738 | 7.231 |
| Dividend Yield | 0.6065% | 0.9618% |
| Active Share | 75.07% | 57.17% |
| Portfolio Turnover | - | - |
| YTM | - | - |
| Duration (Macaulay) | - | - |
Punji Fund Health Score
PGIM India Large and Midcap Fund has the stronger Punji Quality grade of the two.
Frequently asked questions
Which has a lower expense ratio, HSBC Large & Mid Cap Fund or PGIM India Large and Midcap Fund?
PGIM India Large and Midcap Fund's direct-plan expense ratio is 0.50 percentage points lower than HSBC Large & Mid Cap Fund's. Over long holding periods, a persistent expense-ratio gap compounds into a materially different final corpus even if the two funds' gross returns are similar - it's one of the few fund attributes you can compare with total certainty upfront, unlike future returns, since the fee is contractually fixed rather than a historical estimate.
Why don't HSBC Large & Mid Cap Fund and PGIM India Large and Midcap Fund show risk metrics like Sharpe ratio or alpha?
This fund is less than three years old, so a three-year risk history does not exist yet. This is a deliberate methodology choice, not missing data - risk metrics like alpha and Sharpe ratio are most meaningful for actively-managed funds where a manager makes decisions that can add or subtract value versus a benchmark. For a fund that mechanically tracks an index, the equivalent useful metric is tracking error (how closely it follows its index), not alpha.
Which has higher AUM, HSBC Large & Mid Cap Fund or PGIM India Large and Midcap Fund?
HSBC Large & Mid Cap Fund has ₹5,679 Cr in assets under management, versus ₹762 Cr for PGIM India Large and Midcap Fund. A larger AUM generally means deeper liquidity and lower per-unit fixed costs for the AMC to spread across investors, but an AUM that's very large relative to a fund's category and strategy (especially in small/mid cap categories, where the investable universe is smaller) can also make it harder for a manager to enter and exit positions without moving the price - bigger isn't automatically better, especially for less liquid categories.
Which fund has a longer track record, HSBC Large & Mid Cap Fund or PGIM India Large and Midcap Fund?
HSBC Large & Mid Cap Fund launched on 2019-03-11, making it older than PGIM India Large and Midcap Fund (launched 2024-01-24). A longer track record means more real market cycles (bull runs, corrections, rate cycles) the fund has actually navigated, which is useful context for judging consistency - but it isn't a guarantee of future performance, and a newer fund isn't automatically worse, especially if it's run by an experienced manager or team with a track record at a prior fund.
Data as of 2026-10-29. Source: AMFI disclosures via Punji. Not investment advice.