PunjiPUNJI

COMPARE

HSBC Aggressive Hybrid Fund - Direct Growth vs ICICI Prudential Aggressive Hybrid Fund - Direct Plan - Growth

HSBC Aggressive Hybrid Fund and ICICI Prudential Aggressive Hybrid Fund are both in the Aggressive Hybrid Fund category, from HSBC Asset Management (India) Private Ltd. and ICICI Prudential Asset Management Company Limited respectively. ICICI Prudential Aggressive Hybrid Fund has posted a higher 3-year rolling CAGR. HSBC Aggressive Hybrid Fund has the lower expense ratio. See the full table and FAQ below for the complete real-data comparison.

Basics

HSBC Aggressive Hybrid Fund has the lower direct-plan expense ratio, by 0.12 percentage points.

HSBC Aggressive Hybrid Fund - Direct GrowthICICI Prudential Aggressive Hybrid Fund - Direct Plan - Growth
CategoryAggressive Hybrid FundAggressive Hybrid Fund
AMCHSBC Asset Management (India) Private Ltd.ICICI Prudential Asset Management Company Limited
BenchmarkNIFTY 50 Hybrid Composite Debt 65:35 Index TRICRISIL Hybrid 35+65 - Aggressive Index
NAV₹65.6025 (2026-10-28)₹430.83 (2026-10-28)
AUM₹5,469.583 Cr₹49,689.25 Cr
Expense Ratio (Direct)0.95%1.07%
Inception2011-01-172000-01-01

Returns

ICICI Prudential Aggressive Hybrid Fund leads on 3-year rolling CAGR (18.2% vs HSBC Aggressive Hybrid Fund's 15.4%) - see the FAQ below for percentile context within each fund's own category.

Risk Metrics

HSBC Aggressive Hybrid Fund has been the more volatile of the two by standard deviation.

Portfolio Analytics

ICICI Prudential Aggressive Hybrid Fund carries the higher portfolio YTM.

Punji Fund Health Score

ICICI Prudential Aggressive Hybrid Fund has the stronger Punji Quality grade of the two.

Frequently asked questions

Which has a higher 3-year return, HSBC Aggressive Hybrid Fund or ICICI Prudential Aggressive Hybrid Fund?

ICICI Prudential Aggressive Hybrid Fund's 3-year rolling CAGR of 18.2% is higher than HSBC Aggressive Hybrid Fund's 15.4%. ICICI Prudential Aggressive Hybrid Fund sits in the 93rd percentile of its category on this metric, versus the 72nd percentile for HSBC Aggressive Hybrid Fund - though note both funds may belong to different categories with different medians, so a raw CAGR comparison doesn't account for how each fund performed relative to its own peers. A higher historical return also doesn't necessarily mean lower risk; check the risk metrics below before concluding either fund is the "better" choice.

Which has a lower expense ratio, HSBC Aggressive Hybrid Fund or ICICI Prudential Aggressive Hybrid Fund?

HSBC Aggressive Hybrid Fund's direct-plan expense ratio is 0.12 percentage points lower than ICICI Prudential Aggressive Hybrid Fund's. Over long holding periods, a persistent expense-ratio gap compounds into a materially different final corpus even if the two funds' gross returns are similar - it's one of the few fund attributes you can compare with total certainty upfront, unlike future returns, since the fee is contractually fixed rather than a historical estimate.

Which fund carries more risk, HSBC Aggressive Hybrid Fund or ICICI Prudential Aggressive Hybrid Fund?

By standard deviation (a measure of how much a fund's returns swing around its own average), HSBC Aggressive Hybrid Fund has been more volatile than ICICI Prudential Aggressive Hybrid Fund over the trailing window. Standard deviation captures total volatility in both directions - up and down - so a higher figure means bigger swings generally, not necessarily bigger losses specifically. Sharpe ratio (0.26 for HSBC Aggressive Hybrid Fund vs 0.41 for ICICI Prudential Aggressive Hybrid Fund) is a better single measure of risk-adjusted return, since it weighs the return earned per unit of volatility taken rather than volatility alone.

Which has higher AUM, HSBC Aggressive Hybrid Fund or ICICI Prudential Aggressive Hybrid Fund?

ICICI Prudential Aggressive Hybrid Fund has ₹49,689 Cr in assets under management, versus ₹5,470 Cr for HSBC Aggressive Hybrid Fund. A larger AUM generally means deeper liquidity and lower per-unit fixed costs for the AMC to spread across investors, but an AUM that's very large relative to a fund's category and strategy (especially in small/mid cap categories, where the investable universe is smaller) can also make it harder for a manager to enter and exit positions without moving the price - bigger isn't automatically better, especially for less liquid categories.

Which has a higher yield to maturity (YTM), HSBC Aggressive Hybrid Fund or ICICI Prudential Aggressive Hybrid Fund?

ICICI Prudential Aggressive Hybrid Fund's portfolio YTM (8.0269%) is higher than HSBC Aggressive Hybrid Fund's. YTM is the weighted-average return a debt fund's current bond holdings would earn if held to maturity, assuming no defaults and coupons reinvested at the same rate - a useful forward-looking yield estimate for debt funds the way rolling CAGR is for equity funds, though it's an estimate based on today's portfolio, not a guaranteed return, and can move as bonds are bought/sold or as interest rates change.

Which fund has a longer track record, HSBC Aggressive Hybrid Fund or ICICI Prudential Aggressive Hybrid Fund?

ICICI Prudential Aggressive Hybrid Fund launched on 2000-01-01, making it older than HSBC Aggressive Hybrid Fund (launched 2011-01-17). A longer track record means more real market cycles (bull runs, corrections, rate cycles) the fund has actually navigated, which is useful context for judging consistency - but it isn't a guarantee of future performance, and a newer fund isn't automatically worse, especially if it's run by an experienced manager or team with a track record at a prior fund.

Data as of 2026-10-29. Source: AMFI disclosures via Punji. Not investment advice.