COMPARE
Helios Large & Mid Cap Fund - Direct Plan - Growth Option vs quant Large & Mid Cap Fund - Growth Option-Direct Plan
Helios Large & Mid Cap Fund and quant Large & Mid Cap Fund are both in the Large & Mid Cap Fund category, from Helios Capital Asset Management (India) Pvt. Ltd. and quant Money Managers Limited respectively. Helios Large & Mid Cap Fund has the lower expense ratio. See the full table and FAQ below for the complete real-data comparison.
Basics
Helios Large & Mid Cap Fund has the lower direct-plan expense ratio, by 0.19 percentage points.
| Helios Large & Mid Cap Fund - Direct Plan - Growth Option | quant Large & Mid Cap Fund - Growth Option-Direct Plan | |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Large & Mid Cap Fund | Large & Mid Cap Fund |
| AMC | Helios Capital Asset Management (India) Pvt. Ltd. | quant Money Managers Limited |
| Benchmark | NIFTY LargeMidcap 250 TRI | NIFTY LargeMidcap 250 TRI |
| NAV | ₹10.92 (2026-10-28) | ₹131.6213 (2026-10-28) |
| AUM | ₹1,452.366 Cr | ₹3,297.195 Cr |
| Expense Ratio (Direct) | 1.04% | 1.23% |
| Inception | 2024-10-10 | 2006-11-20 |
Returns
Risk Metrics
This fund is less than three years old, so a three-year risk history does not exist yet.
Portfolio Analytics
Helios Large & Mid Cap Fund carries the higher portfolio P/E ratio (a rougher proxy for how richly the underlying holdings are valued) - see the table below for the full comparison.
| Helios Large & Mid Cap Fund - Direct Plan - Growth Option | quant Large & Mid Cap Fund - Growth Option-Direct Plan | |
|---|---|---|
| P/E Ratio | 35.7613 | 30.8438 |
| P/B Ratio | 10.6868 | 4.4922 |
| Dividend Yield | 0.7044% | 0.3129% |
| Active Share | 64.84% | 95.91% |
| Portfolio Turnover | 36% | - |
| YTM | - | 5.3701% |
| Duration (Macaulay) | - | - |
Punji Fund Health Score
Helios Large & Mid Cap Fund has the stronger Punji Quality grade of the two.
Frequently asked questions
Which has a lower expense ratio, Helios Large & Mid Cap Fund or quant Large & Mid Cap Fund?
Helios Large & Mid Cap Fund's direct-plan expense ratio is 0.19 percentage points lower than quant Large & Mid Cap Fund's. Over long holding periods, a persistent expense-ratio gap compounds into a materially different final corpus even if the two funds' gross returns are similar - it's one of the few fund attributes you can compare with total certainty upfront, unlike future returns, since the fee is contractually fixed rather than a historical estimate.
Why don't Helios Large & Mid Cap Fund and quant Large & Mid Cap Fund show risk metrics like Sharpe ratio or alpha?
This fund is less than three years old, so a three-year risk history does not exist yet. This is a deliberate methodology choice, not missing data - risk metrics like alpha and Sharpe ratio are most meaningful for actively-managed funds where a manager makes decisions that can add or subtract value versus a benchmark. For a fund that mechanically tracks an index, the equivalent useful metric is tracking error (how closely it follows its index), not alpha.
Which has higher AUM, Helios Large & Mid Cap Fund or quant Large & Mid Cap Fund?
quant Large & Mid Cap Fund has ₹3,297 Cr in assets under management, versus ₹1,452 Cr for Helios Large & Mid Cap Fund. A larger AUM generally means deeper liquidity and lower per-unit fixed costs for the AMC to spread across investors, but an AUM that's very large relative to a fund's category and strategy (especially in small/mid cap categories, where the investable universe is smaller) can also make it harder for a manager to enter and exit positions without moving the price - bigger isn't automatically better, especially for less liquid categories.
Which fund has a longer track record, Helios Large & Mid Cap Fund or quant Large & Mid Cap Fund?
quant Large & Mid Cap Fund launched on 2006-11-20, making it older than Helios Large & Mid Cap Fund (launched 2024-10-10). A longer track record means more real market cycles (bull runs, corrections, rate cycles) the fund has actually navigated, which is useful context for judging consistency - but it isn't a guarantee of future performance, and a newer fund isn't automatically worse, especially if it's run by an experienced manager or team with a track record at a prior fund.
Data as of 2026-10-29. Source: AMFI disclosures via Punji. Not investment advice.