COMPARE
HDFC Multi-Asset Active FOF - Growth Option -Direct Plan vs Zerodha Silver ETF FoF - Direct Growth
HDFC Multi-Asset Active FOF and Zerodha Silver ETF FoF are both in the FoF Domestic category, from HDFC Asset Management Company Limited and Zerodha Asset Management Private Limited respectively. HDFC Multi-Asset Active FOF has the lower expense ratio. See the full table and FAQ below for the complete real-data comparison.
Basics
HDFC Multi-Asset Active FOF has the lower direct-plan expense ratio, by 0.07 percentage points.
| HDFC Multi-Asset Active FOF - Growth Option -Direct Plan | Zerodha Silver ETF FoF - Direct Growth | |
|---|---|---|
| Category | FoF Domestic | FoF Domestic |
| AMC | HDFC Asset Management Company Limited | Zerodha Asset Management Private Limited |
| Benchmark | 50% NIFTY 50 TRI + 40% NIFTY Composite Debt Index + 10% Gold | Domestic Silver Price (SILVERBEES) |
| NAV | ₹19.99 (2026-10-28) | ₹17.4683 (2026-10-28) |
| AUM | ₹5,865.715 Cr | ₹209.12 Cr |
| Expense Ratio (Direct) | 0.14% | 0.21% |
| Inception | 2021-04-16 | 2025-06-23 |
Returns
Risk Metrics
This is a fund of funds. Its risk profile belongs to the schemes it holds, not to a benchmark of its own.
Portfolio Analytics
Punji Fund Health Score
Zerodha Silver ETF FoF has the stronger Punji Quality grade of the two.
Frequently asked questions
Which has a lower expense ratio, HDFC Multi-Asset Active FOF or Zerodha Silver ETF FoF?
HDFC Multi-Asset Active FOF's direct-plan expense ratio is 0.07 percentage points lower than Zerodha Silver ETF FoF's. Over long holding periods, a persistent expense-ratio gap compounds into a materially different final corpus even if the two funds' gross returns are similar - it's one of the few fund attributes you can compare with total certainty upfront, unlike future returns, since the fee is contractually fixed rather than a historical estimate.
Why don't HDFC Multi-Asset Active FOF and Zerodha Silver ETF FoF show risk metrics like Sharpe ratio or alpha?
This is a fund of funds. Its risk profile belongs to the schemes it holds, not to a benchmark of its own. This is a deliberate methodology choice, not missing data - risk metrics like alpha and Sharpe ratio are most meaningful for actively-managed funds where a manager makes decisions that can add or subtract value versus a benchmark. For a fund that mechanically tracks an index, the equivalent useful metric is tracking error (how closely it follows its index), not alpha.
Which has higher AUM, HDFC Multi-Asset Active FOF or Zerodha Silver ETF FoF?
HDFC Multi-Asset Active FOF has ₹5,866 Cr in assets under management, versus ₹209 Cr for Zerodha Silver ETF FoF. A larger AUM generally means deeper liquidity and lower per-unit fixed costs for the AMC to spread across investors, but an AUM that's very large relative to a fund's category and strategy (especially in small/mid cap categories, where the investable universe is smaller) can also make it harder for a manager to enter and exit positions without moving the price - bigger isn't automatically better, especially for less liquid categories.
Which fund has a longer track record, HDFC Multi-Asset Active FOF or Zerodha Silver ETF FoF?
HDFC Multi-Asset Active FOF launched on 2021-04-16, making it older than Zerodha Silver ETF FoF (launched 2025-06-23). A longer track record means more real market cycles (bull runs, corrections, rate cycles) the fund has actually navigated, which is useful context for judging consistency - but it isn't a guarantee of future performance, and a newer fund isn't automatically worse, especially if it's run by an experienced manager or team with a track record at a prior fund.
Data as of 2026-10-29. Source: AMFI disclosures via Punji. Not investment advice.