PunjiPUNJI

COMPARE

HDFC Equity Savings Fund - Growth Option - Direct Plan vs Mahindra Manulife Equity Savings Fund - Direct Plan -Growth

HDFC Equity Savings Fund and Mahindra Manulife Equity Savings Fund are both in the Equity Savings category, from HDFC Asset Management Company Limited and Mahindra Manulife Investment Management Pvt Ltd respectively. Mahindra Manulife Equity Savings Fund has posted a higher 3-year rolling CAGR. Mahindra Manulife Equity Savings Fund has the lower expense ratio. See the full table and FAQ below for the complete real-data comparison.

Basics

Mahindra Manulife Equity Savings Fund has the lower direct-plan expense ratio, by 0.05 percentage points.

HDFC Equity Savings Fund - Growth Option - Direct PlanMahindra Manulife Equity Savings Fund - Direct Plan -Growth
CategoryEquity SavingsEquity Savings
AMCHDFC Asset Management Company LimitedMahindra Manulife Investment Management Pvt Ltd
BenchmarkNifty Equity Savings TRINifty Equity Savings TRI
NAV₹75.434 (2026-10-28)₹25.2815 (2026-10-28)
AUM₹5,480.823 Cr₹515.54 Cr
Expense Ratio (Direct)1.29%1.24%
Inception2004-08-202017-01-10

Returns

Mahindra Manulife Equity Savings Fund leads on 3-year rolling CAGR (11.9% vs HDFC Equity Savings Fund's 11.3%) - see the FAQ below for percentile context within each fund's own category.

Risk Metrics

Mahindra Manulife Equity Savings Fund has been the more volatile of the two by standard deviation.

Portfolio Analytics

Mahindra Manulife Equity Savings Fund carries the higher portfolio P/E ratio (a rougher proxy for how richly the underlying holdings are valued) - see the table below for the full comparison.

Punji Fund Health Score

Mahindra Manulife Equity Savings Fund has the stronger Punji Quality grade of the two.

Frequently asked questions

Which has a higher 3-year return, HDFC Equity Savings Fund or Mahindra Manulife Equity Savings Fund?

Mahindra Manulife Equity Savings Fund's 3-year rolling CAGR of 11.9% is higher than HDFC Equity Savings Fund's 11.3%. Mahindra Manulife Equity Savings Fund sits in the 86th percentile of its category on this metric, versus the 76th percentile for HDFC Equity Savings Fund - though note both funds may belong to different categories with different medians, so a raw CAGR comparison doesn't account for how each fund performed relative to its own peers. A higher historical return also doesn't necessarily mean lower risk; check the risk metrics below before concluding either fund is the "better" choice.

Which has a lower expense ratio, HDFC Equity Savings Fund or Mahindra Manulife Equity Savings Fund?

Mahindra Manulife Equity Savings Fund's direct-plan expense ratio is 0.05 percentage points lower than HDFC Equity Savings Fund's. Over long holding periods, a persistent expense-ratio gap compounds into a materially different final corpus even if the two funds' gross returns are similar - it's one of the few fund attributes you can compare with total certainty upfront, unlike future returns, since the fee is contractually fixed rather than a historical estimate.

Which fund carries more risk, HDFC Equity Savings Fund or Mahindra Manulife Equity Savings Fund?

By standard deviation (a measure of how much a fund's returns swing around its own average), Mahindra Manulife Equity Savings Fund has been more volatile than HDFC Equity Savings Fund over the trailing window. Standard deviation captures total volatility in both directions - up and down - so a higher figure means bigger swings generally, not necessarily bigger losses specifically. Sharpe ratio (0.12 for HDFC Equity Savings Fund vs 0.28 for Mahindra Manulife Equity Savings Fund) is a better single measure of risk-adjusted return, since it weighs the return earned per unit of volatility taken rather than volatility alone.

Which has higher AUM, HDFC Equity Savings Fund or Mahindra Manulife Equity Savings Fund?

HDFC Equity Savings Fund has ₹5,481 Cr in assets under management, versus ₹516 Cr for Mahindra Manulife Equity Savings Fund. A larger AUM generally means deeper liquidity and lower per-unit fixed costs for the AMC to spread across investors, but an AUM that's very large relative to a fund's category and strategy (especially in small/mid cap categories, where the investable universe is smaller) can also make it harder for a manager to enter and exit positions without moving the price - bigger isn't automatically better, especially for less liquid categories.

Which fund has a longer track record, HDFC Equity Savings Fund or Mahindra Manulife Equity Savings Fund?

HDFC Equity Savings Fund launched on 2004-08-20, making it older than Mahindra Manulife Equity Savings Fund (launched 2017-01-10). A longer track record means more real market cycles (bull runs, corrections, rate cycles) the fund has actually navigated, which is useful context for judging consistency - but it isn't a guarantee of future performance, and a newer fund isn't automatically worse, especially if it's run by an experienced manager or team with a track record at a prior fund.

Data as of 2026-10-29. Source: AMFI disclosures via Punji. Not investment advice.