COMPARE
Franklin India Ultra Short Duration Fund - Direct - Growth vs Kotak Ultra Short Term Fund -Growth - Direct
Franklin India Ultra Short Duration Fund and Kotak Ultra Short Term Fund -Growth are both in the Ultra Short Duration Fund category, from Franklin Templeton Asset Management (India) Private Limited and Kotak Mahindra Asset Management Company Limited. respectively. Franklin India Ultra Short Duration Fund has the lower expense ratio. See the full table and FAQ below for the complete real-data comparison.
Basics
Franklin India Ultra Short Duration Fund has the lower direct-plan expense ratio, by 0.07 percentage points.
| Franklin India Ultra Short Duration Fund - Direct - Growth | Kotak Ultra Short Term Fund -Growth - Direct | |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Ultra Short Duration Fund | Ultra Short Duration Fund |
| AMC | Franklin Templeton Asset Management (India) Private Limited | Kotak Mahindra Asset Management Company Limited. |
| Benchmark | No benchmark required for this fund category | No benchmark required for this fund category |
| NAV | ₹11.5925 (2026-10-28) | ₹48.7513 (2026-10-28) |
| AUM | ₹300.05 Cr | ₹15,393.347 Cr |
| Expense Ratio (Direct) | 0.29% | 0.36% |
| Inception | 2024-08-19 | 2008-10-07 |
Returns
Risk Metrics
Risk metrics aren't shown for debt funds. Their NAV starts near Rs 10 and compounds steadily, so CAGR, beta and drawdown measure the arithmetic rather than the manager.
Portfolio Analytics
Kotak Ultra Short Term Fund -Growth carries the higher portfolio YTM.
Punji Fund Health Score
Franklin India Ultra Short Duration Fund and Kotak Ultra Short Term Fund -Growth carry the same Punji Quality grade.
Frequently asked questions
Which has a lower expense ratio, Franklin India Ultra Short Duration Fund or Kotak Ultra Short Term Fund -Growth?
Franklin India Ultra Short Duration Fund's direct-plan expense ratio is 0.07 percentage points lower than Kotak Ultra Short Term Fund -Growth's. Over long holding periods, a persistent expense-ratio gap compounds into a materially different final corpus even if the two funds' gross returns are similar - it's one of the few fund attributes you can compare with total certainty upfront, unlike future returns, since the fee is contractually fixed rather than a historical estimate.
Why don't Franklin India Ultra Short Duration Fund and Kotak Ultra Short Term Fund -Growth show risk metrics like Sharpe ratio or alpha?
Risk metrics aren't shown for debt funds. Their NAV starts near Rs 10 and compounds steadily, so CAGR, beta and drawdown measure the arithmetic rather than the manager. This is a deliberate methodology choice, not missing data - risk metrics like alpha and Sharpe ratio are most meaningful for actively-managed funds where a manager makes decisions that can add or subtract value versus a benchmark. For a fund that mechanically tracks an index, the equivalent useful metric is tracking error (how closely it follows its index), not alpha.
Which has higher AUM, Franklin India Ultra Short Duration Fund or Kotak Ultra Short Term Fund -Growth?
Kotak Ultra Short Term Fund -Growth has ₹15,393 Cr in assets under management, versus ₹300 Cr for Franklin India Ultra Short Duration Fund. A larger AUM generally means deeper liquidity and lower per-unit fixed costs for the AMC to spread across investors, but an AUM that's very large relative to a fund's category and strategy (especially in small/mid cap categories, where the investable universe is smaller) can also make it harder for a manager to enter and exit positions without moving the price - bigger isn't automatically better, especially for less liquid categories.
Which has a higher yield to maturity (YTM), Franklin India Ultra Short Duration Fund or Kotak Ultra Short Term Fund -Growth?
Kotak Ultra Short Term Fund -Growth's portfolio YTM (7.53%) is higher than Franklin India Ultra Short Duration Fund's. YTM is the weighted-average return a debt fund's current bond holdings would earn if held to maturity, assuming no defaults and coupons reinvested at the same rate - a useful forward-looking yield estimate for debt funds the way rolling CAGR is for equity funds, though it's an estimate based on today's portfolio, not a guaranteed return, and can move as bonds are bought/sold or as interest rates change.
Which has longer duration (more interest-rate sensitivity), Franklin India Ultra Short Duration Fund or Kotak Ultra Short Term Fund -Growth?
Franklin India Ultra Short Duration Fund has the longer Macaulay duration of the two, meaning its NAV is more sensitive to interest-rate changes - a longer-duration debt fund tends to gain more when rates fall and lose more when rates rise, compared to a shorter-duration fund. Duration is expressed in years but isn't literally about how long you hold the fund; it's a measure of price sensitivity to rate moves. If you expect rates to fall, the longer-duration fund benefits more; if you expect rates to rise or want to minimize that swing, the shorter-duration fund is the more conservative pick.
Which fund has a longer track record, Franklin India Ultra Short Duration Fund or Kotak Ultra Short Term Fund -Growth?
Kotak Ultra Short Term Fund -Growth launched on 2008-10-07, making it older than Franklin India Ultra Short Duration Fund (launched 2024-08-19). A longer track record means more real market cycles (bull runs, corrections, rate cycles) the fund has actually navigated, which is useful context for judging consistency - but it isn't a guarantee of future performance, and a newer fund isn't automatically worse, especially if it's run by an experienced manager or team with a track record at a prior fund.
Data as of 2026-10-29. Source: AMFI disclosures via Punji. Not investment advice.