PunjiPUNJI

COMPARE

Franklin India Opportunities Fund - Direct - Growth vs Sundaram Services Fund Direct Plan - Growth

Franklin India Opportunities Fund and Sundaram Services Fund are both in the Sectoral/ Thematic category, from Franklin Templeton Asset Management (India) Private Limited and Sundaram Asset Management Company Ltd respectively. Sundaram Services Fund has posted a higher 3-year rolling CAGR. Sundaram Services Fund has the lower expense ratio. See the full table and FAQ below for the complete real-data comparison.

Basics

Sundaram Services Fund has the lower direct-plan expense ratio, by 0.03 percentage points.

Franklin India Opportunities Fund - Direct - GrowthSundaram Services Fund Direct Plan - Growth
CategorySectoral/ ThematicSectoral/ Thematic
AMCFranklin Templeton Asset Management (India) Private LimitedSundaram Asset Management Company Ltd
BenchmarkNifty 500 TRINifty Services Sector TRI
NAV₹276.9738 (2026-10-28)₹37.5256 (2026-10-28)
AUM₹9,055.35 Cr₹4,895.11 Cr
Expense Ratio (Direct)0.88%0.85%
Inception2000-02-212018-08-29

Returns

Sundaram Services Fund leads on 3-year rolling CAGR (21.8% vs Franklin India Opportunities Fund's 19.1%) - see the FAQ below for percentile context within each fund's own category.

Risk Metrics

Franklin India Opportunities Fund has been the more volatile of the two by standard deviation.

Portfolio Analytics

Sundaram Services Fund carries the higher portfolio YTM.

Punji Fund Health Score

Sundaram Services Fund has the stronger Punji Quality grade of the two.

Frequently asked questions

Which has a higher 3-year return, Franklin India Opportunities Fund or Sundaram Services Fund?

Sundaram Services Fund's 3-year rolling CAGR of 21.8% is higher than Franklin India Opportunities Fund's 19.1%. Sundaram Services Fund sits in the 86th percentile of its category on this metric, versus the 70th percentile for Franklin India Opportunities Fund - though note both funds may belong to different categories with different medians, so a raw CAGR comparison doesn't account for how each fund performed relative to its own peers. A higher historical return also doesn't necessarily mean lower risk; check the risk metrics below before concluding either fund is the "better" choice.

Which has a lower expense ratio, Franklin India Opportunities Fund or Sundaram Services Fund?

Sundaram Services Fund's direct-plan expense ratio is 0.03 percentage points lower than Franklin India Opportunities Fund's. Over long holding periods, a persistent expense-ratio gap compounds into a materially different final corpus even if the two funds' gross returns are similar - it's one of the few fund attributes you can compare with total certainty upfront, unlike future returns, since the fee is contractually fixed rather than a historical estimate.

Which fund carries more risk, Franklin India Opportunities Fund or Sundaram Services Fund?

By standard deviation (a measure of how much a fund's returns swing around its own average), Franklin India Opportunities Fund has been more volatile than Sundaram Services Fund over the trailing window. Standard deviation captures total volatility in both directions - up and down - so a higher figure means bigger swings generally, not necessarily bigger losses specifically. Sharpe ratio (0.57 for Franklin India Opportunities Fund vs 0.28 for Sundaram Services Fund) is a better single measure of risk-adjusted return, since it weighs the return earned per unit of volatility taken rather than volatility alone.

Which has higher AUM, Franklin India Opportunities Fund or Sundaram Services Fund?

Franklin India Opportunities Fund has ₹9,055 Cr in assets under management, versus ₹4,895 Cr for Sundaram Services Fund. A larger AUM generally means deeper liquidity and lower per-unit fixed costs for the AMC to spread across investors, but an AUM that's very large relative to a fund's category and strategy (especially in small/mid cap categories, where the investable universe is smaller) can also make it harder for a manager to enter and exit positions without moving the price - bigger isn't automatically better, especially for less liquid categories.

Which has a higher yield to maturity (YTM), Franklin India Opportunities Fund or Sundaram Services Fund?

Sundaram Services Fund's portfolio YTM (5.975%) is higher than Franklin India Opportunities Fund's. YTM is the weighted-average return a debt fund's current bond holdings would earn if held to maturity, assuming no defaults and coupons reinvested at the same rate - a useful forward-looking yield estimate for debt funds the way rolling CAGR is for equity funds, though it's an estimate based on today's portfolio, not a guaranteed return, and can move as bonds are bought/sold or as interest rates change.

Which fund has a longer track record, Franklin India Opportunities Fund or Sundaram Services Fund?

Franklin India Opportunities Fund launched on 2000-02-21, making it older than Sundaram Services Fund (launched 2018-08-29). A longer track record means more real market cycles (bull runs, corrections, rate cycles) the fund has actually navigated, which is useful context for judging consistency - but it isn't a guarantee of future performance, and a newer fund isn't automatically worse, especially if it's run by an experienced manager or team with a track record at a prior fund.

Data as of 2026-10-29. Source: AMFI disclosures via Punji. Not investment advice.