COMPARE
Franklin India Opportunities Fund - Direct - Growth vs SBI Technology Opportunities Fund - Direct Plan - Growth
Franklin India Opportunities Fund and SBI Technology Opportunities Fund are both in the Sectoral/ Thematic category, from Franklin Templeton Asset Management (India) Private Limited and SBI Funds Management Limited respectively. Franklin India Opportunities Fund has posted a higher 3-year rolling CAGR. Franklin India Opportunities Fund has the lower expense ratio. See the full table and FAQ below for the complete real-data comparison.
Basics
Franklin India Opportunities Fund has the lower direct-plan expense ratio, by 0.16 percentage points.
| Franklin India Opportunities Fund - Direct - Growth | SBI Technology Opportunities Fund - Direct Plan - Growth | |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Sectoral/ Thematic | Sectoral/ Thematic |
| AMC | Franklin Templeton Asset Management (India) Private Limited | SBI Funds Management Limited |
| Benchmark | Nifty 500 TRI | BSE TECK TRI |
| NAV | ₹276.9738 (2026-10-28) | ₹235.2384 (2026-10-28) |
| AUM | ₹9,055.35 Cr | ₹4,451.877 Cr |
| Expense Ratio (Direct) | 0.88% | 1.04% |
| Inception | 2000-02-21 | 1993-01-01 |
Returns
Franklin India Opportunities Fund leads on 3-year rolling CAGR (19.1% vs SBI Technology Opportunities Fund's 16.8%) - see the FAQ below for percentile context within each fund's own category.
Risk Metrics
SBI Technology Opportunities Fund has been the more volatile of the two by standard deviation.
| Franklin India Opportunities Fund - Direct - Growth | SBI Technology Opportunities Fund - Direct Plan - Growth | |
|---|---|---|
| 3Y Sharpe Ratio | 0.57 | 0.15 |
| 3Y Alpha | 7.869% | 4.1858% |
| 3Y Std Deviation | 15.902% | 16.7048% |
| 3Y Calmar Ratio | 0.90 | 0.40 |
Portfolio Analytics
SBI Technology Opportunities Fund carries the higher portfolio YTM.
| Franklin India Opportunities Fund - Direct - Growth | SBI Technology Opportunities Fund - Direct Plan - Growth | |
|---|---|---|
| P/E Ratio | 32.3127 | 27.5864 |
| P/B Ratio | - | 4.4922 |
| Dividend Yield | 0.5729% | 1.4821% |
| Active Share | 84.75% | 54.43% |
| Portfolio Turnover | 73.50999999999999% | - |
| YTM | 5.3428% | 5.3459% |
| Duration (Macaulay) | - | - |
Punji Fund Health Score
Franklin India Opportunities Fund and SBI Technology Opportunities Fund carry the same Punji Quality grade.
Frequently asked questions
Which has a higher 3-year return, Franklin India Opportunities Fund or SBI Technology Opportunities Fund?
Franklin India Opportunities Fund's 3-year rolling CAGR of 19.1% is higher than SBI Technology Opportunities Fund's 16.8%. Franklin India Opportunities Fund sits in the 70th percentile of its category on this metric, versus the 43rd percentile for SBI Technology Opportunities Fund - though note both funds may belong to different categories with different medians, so a raw CAGR comparison doesn't account for how each fund performed relative to its own peers. A higher historical return also doesn't necessarily mean lower risk; check the risk metrics below before concluding either fund is the "better" choice.
Which has a lower expense ratio, Franklin India Opportunities Fund or SBI Technology Opportunities Fund?
Franklin India Opportunities Fund's direct-plan expense ratio is 0.16 percentage points lower than SBI Technology Opportunities Fund's. Over long holding periods, a persistent expense-ratio gap compounds into a materially different final corpus even if the two funds' gross returns are similar - it's one of the few fund attributes you can compare with total certainty upfront, unlike future returns, since the fee is contractually fixed rather than a historical estimate.
Which fund carries more risk, Franklin India Opportunities Fund or SBI Technology Opportunities Fund?
By standard deviation (a measure of how much a fund's returns swing around its own average), SBI Technology Opportunities Fund has been more volatile than Franklin India Opportunities Fund over the trailing window. Standard deviation captures total volatility in both directions - up and down - so a higher figure means bigger swings generally, not necessarily bigger losses specifically. Sharpe ratio (0.57 for Franklin India Opportunities Fund vs 0.15 for SBI Technology Opportunities Fund) is a better single measure of risk-adjusted return, since it weighs the return earned per unit of volatility taken rather than volatility alone.
Which has higher AUM, Franklin India Opportunities Fund or SBI Technology Opportunities Fund?
Franklin India Opportunities Fund has ₹9,055 Cr in assets under management, versus ₹4,452 Cr for SBI Technology Opportunities Fund. A larger AUM generally means deeper liquidity and lower per-unit fixed costs for the AMC to spread across investors, but an AUM that's very large relative to a fund's category and strategy (especially in small/mid cap categories, where the investable universe is smaller) can also make it harder for a manager to enter and exit positions without moving the price - bigger isn't automatically better, especially for less liquid categories.
Which has a higher yield to maturity (YTM), Franklin India Opportunities Fund or SBI Technology Opportunities Fund?
SBI Technology Opportunities Fund's portfolio YTM (5.3459%) is higher than Franklin India Opportunities Fund's. YTM is the weighted-average return a debt fund's current bond holdings would earn if held to maturity, assuming no defaults and coupons reinvested at the same rate - a useful forward-looking yield estimate for debt funds the way rolling CAGR is for equity funds, though it's an estimate based on today's portfolio, not a guaranteed return, and can move as bonds are bought/sold or as interest rates change.
Which fund has a longer track record, Franklin India Opportunities Fund or SBI Technology Opportunities Fund?
SBI Technology Opportunities Fund launched on 1993-01-01, making it older than Franklin India Opportunities Fund (launched 2000-02-21). A longer track record means more real market cycles (bull runs, corrections, rate cycles) the fund has actually navigated, which is useful context for judging consistency - but it isn't a guarantee of future performance, and a newer fund isn't automatically worse, especially if it's run by an experienced manager or team with a track record at a prior fund.
Data as of 2026-10-29. Source: AMFI disclosures via Punji. Not investment advice.