PunjiPUNJI

COMPARE

Franklin India Opportunities Fund - Direct - Growth vs Kotak Consumption Fund - Direct plan - Growth Option

Franklin India Opportunities Fund and Kotak Consumption Fund are both in the Sectoral/ Thematic category, from Franklin Templeton Asset Management (India) Private Limited and Kotak Mahindra Asset Management Company Limited. respectively. Kotak Consumption Fund has the lower expense ratio. See the full table and FAQ below for the complete real-data comparison.

Basics

Kotak Consumption Fund has the lower direct-plan expense ratio, by 0.01 percentage points.

Franklin India Opportunities Fund - Direct - GrowthKotak Consumption Fund - Direct plan - Growth Option
CategorySectoral/ ThematicSectoral/ Thematic
AMCFranklin Templeton Asset Management (India) Private LimitedKotak Mahindra Asset Management Company Limited.
BenchmarkNifty 500 TRINifty India Consumption TRI
NAV₹276.9738 (2026-10-28)₹13.949 (2026-10-28)
AUM₹9,055.35 Cr₹1,629.329 Cr
Expense Ratio (Direct)0.88%0.87%
Inception2000-02-212023-10-25

Returns

Risk Metrics

Franklin India Opportunities Fund has been the more volatile of the two by standard deviation.

Portfolio Analytics

Kotak Consumption Fund carries the higher portfolio P/E ratio (a rougher proxy for how richly the underlying holdings are valued) - see the table below for the full comparison.

Punji Fund Health Score

Kotak Consumption Fund has the stronger Punji Quality grade of the two.

Frequently asked questions

Which has a lower expense ratio, Franklin India Opportunities Fund or Kotak Consumption Fund?

Kotak Consumption Fund's direct-plan expense ratio is 0.01 percentage points lower than Franklin India Opportunities Fund's. Over long holding periods, a persistent expense-ratio gap compounds into a materially different final corpus even if the two funds' gross returns are similar - it's one of the few fund attributes you can compare with total certainty upfront, unlike future returns, since the fee is contractually fixed rather than a historical estimate.

Which fund carries more risk, Franklin India Opportunities Fund or Kotak Consumption Fund?

By standard deviation (a measure of how much a fund's returns swing around its own average), Franklin India Opportunities Fund has been more volatile than Kotak Consumption Fund over the trailing window. Standard deviation captures total volatility in both directions - up and down - so a higher figure means bigger swings generally, not necessarily bigger losses specifically. Sharpe ratio (0.57 for Franklin India Opportunities Fund vs 0.24 for Kotak Consumption Fund) is a better single measure of risk-adjusted return, since it weighs the return earned per unit of volatility taken rather than volatility alone.

Which has higher AUM, Franklin India Opportunities Fund or Kotak Consumption Fund?

Franklin India Opportunities Fund has ₹9,055 Cr in assets under management, versus ₹1,629 Cr for Kotak Consumption Fund. A larger AUM generally means deeper liquidity and lower per-unit fixed costs for the AMC to spread across investors, but an AUM that's very large relative to a fund's category and strategy (especially in small/mid cap categories, where the investable universe is smaller) can also make it harder for a manager to enter and exit positions without moving the price - bigger isn't automatically better, especially for less liquid categories.

Which fund has a longer track record, Franklin India Opportunities Fund or Kotak Consumption Fund?

Franklin India Opportunities Fund launched on 2000-02-21, making it older than Kotak Consumption Fund (launched 2023-10-25). A longer track record means more real market cycles (bull runs, corrections, rate cycles) the fund has actually navigated, which is useful context for judging consistency - but it isn't a guarantee of future performance, and a newer fund isn't automatically worse, especially if it's run by an experienced manager or team with a track record at a prior fund.

Data as of 2026-10-29. Source: AMFI disclosures via Punji. Not investment advice.