COMPARE
Franklin India Mid Cap Fund - Direct - Growth vs HSBC Midcap Fund - Direct Growth
Franklin India Mid Cap Fund and HSBC Midcap Fund are both in the Mid Cap Fund category, from Franklin Templeton Asset Management (India) Private Limited and HSBC Asset Management (India) Private Ltd. respectively. HSBC Midcap Fund has posted a higher 3-year rolling CAGR. Franklin India Mid Cap Fund has the lower expense ratio. See the full table and FAQ below for the complete real-data comparison.
Basics
Franklin India Mid Cap Fund has the lower direct-plan expense ratio, by 0.02 percentage points.
| Franklin India Mid Cap Fund - Direct - Growth | HSBC Midcap Fund - Direct Growth | |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Mid Cap Fund | Mid Cap Fund |
| AMC | Franklin Templeton Asset Management (India) Private Limited | HSBC Asset Management (India) Private Ltd. |
| Benchmark | Nifty Midcap 150 TRI | Nifty Midcap 150 TRI |
| NAV | ₹2924.0467 (2026-10-28) | ₹502.9783 (2026-10-28) |
| AUM | ₹11,730.57 Cr | ₹16,372.657 Cr |
| Expense Ratio (Direct) | 1.13% | 1.15% |
| Inception | 1993-12-01 | 2004-06-24 |
Returns
HSBC Midcap Fund leads on 3-year rolling CAGR (25.8% vs Franklin India Mid Cap Fund's 19.6%) - see the FAQ below for percentile context within each fund's own category.
Risk Metrics
HSBC Midcap Fund has been the more volatile of the two by standard deviation.
| Franklin India Mid Cap Fund - Direct - Growth | HSBC Midcap Fund - Direct Growth | |
|---|---|---|
| 3Y Sharpe Ratio | 0.29 | 0.63 |
| 3Y Alpha | 0.9433% | 7.6777% |
| 3Y Std Deviation | 15.6511% | 18.8795% |
| 3Y Calmar Ratio | 0.63 | 0.73 |
Portfolio Analytics
HSBC Midcap Fund carries the higher portfolio P/E ratio (a rougher proxy for how richly the underlying holdings are valued) - see the table below for the full comparison.
| Franklin India Mid Cap Fund - Direct - Growth | HSBC Midcap Fund - Direct Growth | |
|---|---|---|
| P/E Ratio | 31.4172 | 42.3761 |
| P/B Ratio | 4.4922 | - |
| Dividend Yield | 0.7224% | 0.4829% |
| Active Share | 61.3% | 73.25% |
| Portfolio Turnover | 40.69% | 129% |
| YTM | 5.2805% | - |
| Duration (Macaulay) | - | - |
Punji Fund Health Score
HSBC Midcap Fund has the stronger Punji Quality grade of the two.
Frequently asked questions
Which has a higher 3-year return, Franklin India Mid Cap Fund or HSBC Midcap Fund?
HSBC Midcap Fund's 3-year rolling CAGR of 25.8% is higher than Franklin India Mid Cap Fund's 19.6%. HSBC Midcap Fund sits in the 93rd percentile of its category on this metric, versus the 28th percentile for Franklin India Mid Cap Fund - though note both funds may belong to different categories with different medians, so a raw CAGR comparison doesn't account for how each fund performed relative to its own peers. A higher historical return also doesn't necessarily mean lower risk; check the risk metrics below before concluding either fund is the "better" choice.
Which has a lower expense ratio, Franklin India Mid Cap Fund or HSBC Midcap Fund?
Franklin India Mid Cap Fund's direct-plan expense ratio is 0.02 percentage points lower than HSBC Midcap Fund's. Over long holding periods, a persistent expense-ratio gap compounds into a materially different final corpus even if the two funds' gross returns are similar - it's one of the few fund attributes you can compare with total certainty upfront, unlike future returns, since the fee is contractually fixed rather than a historical estimate.
Which fund carries more risk, Franklin India Mid Cap Fund or HSBC Midcap Fund?
By standard deviation (a measure of how much a fund's returns swing around its own average), HSBC Midcap Fund has been more volatile than Franklin India Mid Cap Fund over the trailing window. Standard deviation captures total volatility in both directions - up and down - so a higher figure means bigger swings generally, not necessarily bigger losses specifically. Sharpe ratio (0.29 for Franklin India Mid Cap Fund vs 0.63 for HSBC Midcap Fund) is a better single measure of risk-adjusted return, since it weighs the return earned per unit of volatility taken rather than volatility alone.
Which has higher AUM, Franklin India Mid Cap Fund or HSBC Midcap Fund?
HSBC Midcap Fund has ₹16,373 Cr in assets under management, versus ₹11,731 Cr for Franklin India Mid Cap Fund. A larger AUM generally means deeper liquidity and lower per-unit fixed costs for the AMC to spread across investors, but an AUM that's very large relative to a fund's category and strategy (especially in small/mid cap categories, where the investable universe is smaller) can also make it harder for a manager to enter and exit positions without moving the price - bigger isn't automatically better, especially for less liquid categories.
Which fund has a longer track record, Franklin India Mid Cap Fund or HSBC Midcap Fund?
Franklin India Mid Cap Fund launched on 1993-12-01, making it older than HSBC Midcap Fund (launched 2004-06-24). A longer track record means more real market cycles (bull runs, corrections, rate cycles) the fund has actually navigated, which is useful context for judging consistency - but it isn't a guarantee of future performance, and a newer fund isn't automatically worse, especially if it's run by an experienced manager or team with a track record at a prior fund.
Data as of 2026-10-29. Source: AMFI disclosures via Punji. Not investment advice.