COMPARE
Franklin India Dynamic Asset Allocation Active Fund Of Funds - Direct - Growth vs Nippon India Silver ETF FOF- Direct Plan-Growth Option
Franklin India Dynamic Asset Allocation Active Fund Of Funds and Nippon India Silver ETF FOF- are both in the FoF Domestic category, from Franklin Templeton Asset Management (India) Private Limited and Nippon Life India Asset Management Limited respectively. Nippon India Silver ETF FOF- has posted a higher 3-year rolling CAGR. Nippon India Silver ETF FOF- has the lower expense ratio. See the full table and FAQ below for the complete real-data comparison.
Basics
Nippon India Silver ETF FOF- has the lower direct-plan expense ratio, by 0.81 percentage points.
| Franklin India Dynamic Asset Allocation Active Fund Of Funds - Direct - Growth | Nippon India Silver ETF FOF- Direct Plan-Growth Option | |
|---|---|---|
| Category | FoF Domestic | FoF Domestic |
| AMC | Franklin Templeton Asset Management (India) Private Limited | Nippon Life India Asset Management Limited |
| Benchmark | CRISIL Hybrid 50+50 - Moderate Index | Domestic Silver Price (SILVERBEES) |
| NAV | ₹183.2697 (2026-10-28) | ₹29.2463 (2026-10-28) |
| AUM | ₹1,172.52 Cr | ₹3,991.359 Cr |
| Expense Ratio (Direct) | 1.03% | 0.22% |
| Inception | 2003-10-31 | 2022-01-13 |
Returns
Nippon India Silver ETF FOF- leads on 3-year rolling CAGR (37.2% vs Franklin India Dynamic Asset Allocation Active Fund Of Funds's 11.6%) - see the FAQ below for percentile context within each fund's own category.
Risk Metrics
This is a fund of funds. Its risk profile belongs to the schemes it holds, not to a benchmark of its own.
Portfolio Analytics
Punji Fund Health Score
Nippon India Silver ETF FOF- has the stronger Punji Quality grade of the two.
Frequently asked questions
Which has a higher 3-year return, Franklin India Dynamic Asset Allocation Active Fund Of Funds or Nippon India Silver ETF FOF-?
Nippon India Silver ETF FOF-'s 3-year rolling CAGR of 37.2% is higher than Franklin India Dynamic Asset Allocation Active Fund Of Funds's 11.6%. Nippon India Silver ETF FOF- sits in the 91st percentile of its category on this metric, versus the 39th percentile for Franklin India Dynamic Asset Allocation Active Fund Of Funds - though note both funds may belong to different categories with different medians, so a raw CAGR comparison doesn't account for how each fund performed relative to its own peers. A higher historical return also doesn't necessarily mean lower risk; check the risk metrics below before concluding either fund is the "better" choice.
Which has a lower expense ratio, Franklin India Dynamic Asset Allocation Active Fund Of Funds or Nippon India Silver ETF FOF-?
Nippon India Silver ETF FOF-'s direct-plan expense ratio is 0.81 percentage points lower than Franklin India Dynamic Asset Allocation Active Fund Of Funds's. Over long holding periods, a persistent expense-ratio gap compounds into a materially different final corpus even if the two funds' gross returns are similar - it's one of the few fund attributes you can compare with total certainty upfront, unlike future returns, since the fee is contractually fixed rather than a historical estimate.
Why don't Franklin India Dynamic Asset Allocation Active Fund Of Funds and Nippon India Silver ETF FOF- show risk metrics like Sharpe ratio or alpha?
This is a fund of funds. Its risk profile belongs to the schemes it holds, not to a benchmark of its own. This is a deliberate methodology choice, not missing data - risk metrics like alpha and Sharpe ratio are most meaningful for actively-managed funds where a manager makes decisions that can add or subtract value versus a benchmark. For a fund that mechanically tracks an index, the equivalent useful metric is tracking error (how closely it follows its index), not alpha.
Which has higher AUM, Franklin India Dynamic Asset Allocation Active Fund Of Funds or Nippon India Silver ETF FOF-?
Nippon India Silver ETF FOF- has ₹3,991 Cr in assets under management, versus ₹1,173 Cr for Franklin India Dynamic Asset Allocation Active Fund Of Funds. A larger AUM generally means deeper liquidity and lower per-unit fixed costs for the AMC to spread across investors, but an AUM that's very large relative to a fund's category and strategy (especially in small/mid cap categories, where the investable universe is smaller) can also make it harder for a manager to enter and exit positions without moving the price - bigger isn't automatically better, especially for less liquid categories.
Which fund has a longer track record, Franklin India Dynamic Asset Allocation Active Fund Of Funds or Nippon India Silver ETF FOF-?
Franklin India Dynamic Asset Allocation Active Fund Of Funds launched on 2003-10-31, making it older than Nippon India Silver ETF FOF- (launched 2022-01-13). A longer track record means more real market cycles (bull runs, corrections, rate cycles) the fund has actually navigated, which is useful context for judging consistency - but it isn't a guarantee of future performance, and a newer fund isn't automatically worse, especially if it's run by an experienced manager or team with a track record at a prior fund.
Data as of 2026-10-29. Source: AMFI disclosures via Punji. Not investment advice.