COMPARE
Franklin India Dividend Yield Fund - Direct - Growth vs UTI-Dividend Yield Fund.-Growth-Direct
Franklin India Dividend Yield Fund and UTI-Dividend Yield Fund.-Growth-Direct are both in the Dividend Yield Fund category, from Franklin Templeton Asset Management (India) Private Limited and UTI Asset Mgmt. Co. Ltd. respectively. Franklin India Dividend Yield Fund has the lower expense ratio. See the full table and FAQ below for the complete real-data comparison.
Basics
Franklin India Dividend Yield Fund has the lower direct-plan expense ratio, by 0.22 percentage points.
| Franklin India Dividend Yield Fund - Direct - Growth | UTI-Dividend Yield Fund.-Growth-Direct | |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Dividend Yield Fund | Dividend Yield Fund |
| AMC | Franklin Templeton Asset Management (India) Private Limited | UTI Asset Mgmt. Co. Ltd. |
| Benchmark | Nifty 500 TRI | Nifty 500 TRI |
| NAV | ₹142.3867 (2026-10-30) | ₹182.7713 (2026-10-30) |
| AUM | ₹2,141.01 Cr | ₹3,524.869 Cr |
| Expense Ratio (Direct) | 1.32% | 1.54% |
| Inception | 2006-03-22 | 2005-04-11 |
Returns
Risk Metrics
UTI-Dividend Yield Fund.-Growth-Direct has been the more volatile of the two by standard deviation.
| Franklin India Dividend Yield Fund - Direct - Growth | UTI-Dividend Yield Fund.-Growth-Direct | |
|---|---|---|
| 3Y Sharpe Ratio | 0.24 | 0.38 |
| 3Y Alpha | 1.5859% | 3.3225% |
| 3Y Std Deviation | 12.076% | 12.7273% |
| 3Y Calmar Ratio | 0.62 | 0.65 |
Portfolio Analytics
UTI-Dividend Yield Fund.-Growth-Direct carries the higher portfolio P/E ratio (a rougher proxy for how richly the underlying holdings are valued) - see the table below for the full comparison.
| Franklin India Dividend Yield Fund - Direct - Growth | UTI-Dividend Yield Fund.-Growth-Direct | |
|---|---|---|
| P/E Ratio | 10.4865 | 12.9845 |
| P/B Ratio | 3.9717 | 3.2392 |
| Dividend Yield | 2.7908% | 2.1066% |
| Active Share | 78.72% | - |
| Portfolio Turnover | 4156% | 22% |
| YTM | - | - |
| Duration (Macaulay) | - | - |
Punji Fund Health Score
Franklin India Dividend Yield Fund and UTI-Dividend Yield Fund.-Growth-Direct carry the same Punji Quality grade.
Frequently asked questions
Which has a lower expense ratio, Franklin India Dividend Yield Fund or UTI-Dividend Yield Fund.-Growth-Direct?
Franklin India Dividend Yield Fund's direct-plan expense ratio is 0.22 percentage points lower than UTI-Dividend Yield Fund.-Growth-Direct's. Over long holding periods, a persistent expense-ratio gap compounds into a materially different final corpus even if the two funds' gross returns are similar - it's one of the few fund attributes you can compare with total certainty upfront, unlike future returns, since the fee is contractually fixed rather than a historical estimate.
Which fund carries more risk, Franklin India Dividend Yield Fund or UTI-Dividend Yield Fund.-Growth-Direct?
By standard deviation (a measure of how much a fund's returns swing around its own average), UTI-Dividend Yield Fund.-Growth-Direct has been more volatile than Franklin India Dividend Yield Fund over the trailing window. Standard deviation captures total volatility in both directions - up and down - so a higher figure means bigger swings generally, not necessarily bigger losses specifically. Sharpe ratio (0.24 for Franklin India Dividend Yield Fund vs 0.38 for UTI-Dividend Yield Fund.-Growth-Direct) is a better single measure of risk-adjusted return, since it weighs the return earned per unit of volatility taken rather than volatility alone.
Which has higher AUM, Franklin India Dividend Yield Fund or UTI-Dividend Yield Fund.-Growth-Direct?
UTI-Dividend Yield Fund.-Growth-Direct has ₹3,525 Cr in assets under management, versus ₹2,141 Cr for Franklin India Dividend Yield Fund. A larger AUM generally means deeper liquidity and lower per-unit fixed costs for the AMC to spread across investors, but an AUM that's very large relative to a fund's category and strategy (especially in small/mid cap categories, where the investable universe is smaller) can also make it harder for a manager to enter and exit positions without moving the price - bigger isn't automatically better, especially for less liquid categories.
Which fund has a longer track record, Franklin India Dividend Yield Fund or UTI-Dividend Yield Fund.-Growth-Direct?
UTI-Dividend Yield Fund.-Growth-Direct launched on 2005-04-11, making it older than Franklin India Dividend Yield Fund (launched 2006-03-22). A longer track record means more real market cycles (bull runs, corrections, rate cycles) the fund has actually navigated, which is useful context for judging consistency - but it isn't a guarantee of future performance, and a newer fund isn't automatically worse, especially if it's run by an experienced manager or team with a track record at a prior fund.
Data as of 2026-11-01. Source: AMFI disclosures via Punji. Not investment advice.