PunjiPUNJI

COMPARE

Franklin India Dividend Yield Fund - Direct - Growth vs LIC MF Dividend Yield Fund-Direct Plan-Growth

Franklin India Dividend Yield Fund and LIC MF Dividend Yield Fund- are both in the Dividend Yield Fund category, from Franklin Templeton Asset Management (India) Private Limited and LIC Mutual Fund Asset Management Limited respectively. LIC MF Dividend Yield Fund- has the lower expense ratio. See the full table and FAQ below for the complete real-data comparison.

Basics

LIC MF Dividend Yield Fund- has the lower direct-plan expense ratio, by 0.36 percentage points.

Franklin India Dividend Yield Fund - Direct - GrowthLIC MF Dividend Yield Fund-Direct Plan-Growth
CategoryDividend Yield FundDividend Yield Fund
AMCFranklin Templeton Asset Management (India) Private LimitedLIC Mutual Fund Asset Management Limited
BenchmarkNifty 500 TRINifty 500 TRI
NAV₹142.3867 (2026-10-30)₹33.7148 (2026-10-30)
AUM₹2,141.01 Cr₹717.029 Cr
Expense Ratio (Direct)1.32%0.96%
Inception2006-03-222018-12-03

Returns

Risk Metrics

LIC MF Dividend Yield Fund- has been the more volatile of the two by standard deviation.

Portfolio Analytics

LIC MF Dividend Yield Fund- carries the higher portfolio P/E ratio (a rougher proxy for how richly the underlying holdings are valued) - see the table below for the full comparison.

Punji Fund Health Score

Franklin India Dividend Yield Fund and LIC MF Dividend Yield Fund- carry the same Punji Quality grade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has a lower expense ratio, Franklin India Dividend Yield Fund or LIC MF Dividend Yield Fund-?

LIC MF Dividend Yield Fund-'s direct-plan expense ratio is 0.36 percentage points lower than Franklin India Dividend Yield Fund's. Over long holding periods, a persistent expense-ratio gap compounds into a materially different final corpus even if the two funds' gross returns are similar - it's one of the few fund attributes you can compare with total certainty upfront, unlike future returns, since the fee is contractually fixed rather than a historical estimate.

Which fund carries more risk, Franklin India Dividend Yield Fund or LIC MF Dividend Yield Fund-?

By standard deviation (a measure of how much a fund's returns swing around its own average), LIC MF Dividend Yield Fund- has been more volatile than Franklin India Dividend Yield Fund over the trailing window. Standard deviation captures total volatility in both directions - up and down - so a higher figure means bigger swings generally, not necessarily bigger losses specifically. Sharpe ratio (0.24 for Franklin India Dividend Yield Fund vs 0.56 for LIC MF Dividend Yield Fund-) is a better single measure of risk-adjusted return, since it weighs the return earned per unit of volatility taken rather than volatility alone.

Which has higher AUM, Franklin India Dividend Yield Fund or LIC MF Dividend Yield Fund-?

Franklin India Dividend Yield Fund has ₹2,141 Cr in assets under management, versus ₹717 Cr for LIC MF Dividend Yield Fund-. A larger AUM generally means deeper liquidity and lower per-unit fixed costs for the AMC to spread across investors, but an AUM that's very large relative to a fund's category and strategy (especially in small/mid cap categories, where the investable universe is smaller) can also make it harder for a manager to enter and exit positions without moving the price - bigger isn't automatically better, especially for less liquid categories.

Which fund has a longer track record, Franklin India Dividend Yield Fund or LIC MF Dividend Yield Fund-?

Franklin India Dividend Yield Fund launched on 2006-03-22, making it older than LIC MF Dividend Yield Fund- (launched 2018-12-03). A longer track record means more real market cycles (bull runs, corrections, rate cycles) the fund has actually navigated, which is useful context for judging consistency - but it isn't a guarantee of future performance, and a newer fund isn't automatically worse, especially if it's run by an experienced manager or team with a track record at a prior fund.

Data as of 2026-11-01. Source: AMFI disclosures via Punji. Not investment advice.