COMPARE
Franklin India Aggressive Hybrid Fund - Direct - Growth vs quant Aggressive Hybrid Fund-Growth Option-Direct Plan
Franklin India Aggressive Hybrid Fund and quant Aggressive Hybrid Fund- are both in the Aggressive Hybrid Fund category, from Franklin Templeton Asset Management (India) Private Limited and quant Money Managers Limited respectively. quant Aggressive Hybrid Fund- has posted a higher 3-year rolling CAGR. Franklin India Aggressive Hybrid Fund has the lower expense ratio. See the full table and FAQ below for the complete real-data comparison.
Basics
Franklin India Aggressive Hybrid Fund has the lower direct-plan expense ratio, by 0.33 percentage points.
| Franklin India Aggressive Hybrid Fund - Direct - Growth | quant Aggressive Hybrid Fund-Growth Option-Direct Plan | |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Aggressive Hybrid Fund | Aggressive Hybrid Fund |
| AMC | Franklin Templeton Asset Management (India) Private Limited | quant Money Managers Limited |
| Benchmark | CRISIL Hybrid 35+65 - Aggressive Index | NIFTY 50 Hybrid Composite Debt 65:35 Index TRI |
| NAV | ₹292.6429 (2026-10-28) | ₹485.1929 (2026-10-28) |
| AUM | ₹2,203.8 Cr | ₹2,048.692 Cr |
| Expense Ratio (Direct) | 1.11% | 1.44% |
| Inception | 1999-12-10 | 2001-02-19 |
Returns
quant Aggressive Hybrid Fund- leads on 3-year rolling CAGR (16.2% vs Franklin India Aggressive Hybrid Fund's 14.7%) - see the FAQ below for percentile context within each fund's own category.
Risk Metrics
quant Aggressive Hybrid Fund- has been the more volatile of the two by standard deviation.
| Franklin India Aggressive Hybrid Fund - Direct - Growth | quant Aggressive Hybrid Fund-Growth Option-Direct Plan | |
|---|---|---|
| 3Y Sharpe Ratio | 0.05 | 0.31 |
| 3Y Alpha | -0.1856% | 5.1313% |
| 3Y Std Deviation | 9.6659% | 12.4945% |
| 3Y Calmar Ratio | 0.71 | 0.59 |
Portfolio Analytics
Franklin India Aggressive Hybrid Fund carries the higher portfolio YTM.
| Franklin India Aggressive Hybrid Fund - Direct - Growth | quant Aggressive Hybrid Fund-Growth Option-Direct Plan | |
|---|---|---|
| P/E Ratio | 26.8041 | 26.0509 |
| P/B Ratio | - | - |
| Dividend Yield | 0.8664% | 0.5264% |
| Active Share | - | - |
| Portfolio Turnover | 8627% | - |
| YTM | 8.271% | 6.5976% |
| Duration (Macaulay) | 2.9 yrs | - |
Punji Fund Health Score
quant Aggressive Hybrid Fund- has the stronger Punji Quality grade of the two.
Frequently asked questions
Which has a higher 3-year return, Franklin India Aggressive Hybrid Fund or quant Aggressive Hybrid Fund-?
quant Aggressive Hybrid Fund-'s 3-year rolling CAGR of 16.2% is higher than Franklin India Aggressive Hybrid Fund's 14.7%. quant Aggressive Hybrid Fund- sits in the 90th percentile of its category on this metric, versus the 59th percentile for Franklin India Aggressive Hybrid Fund - though note both funds may belong to different categories with different medians, so a raw CAGR comparison doesn't account for how each fund performed relative to its own peers. A higher historical return also doesn't necessarily mean lower risk; check the risk metrics below before concluding either fund is the "better" choice.
Which has a lower expense ratio, Franklin India Aggressive Hybrid Fund or quant Aggressive Hybrid Fund-?
Franklin India Aggressive Hybrid Fund's direct-plan expense ratio is 0.33 percentage points lower than quant Aggressive Hybrid Fund-'s. Over long holding periods, a persistent expense-ratio gap compounds into a materially different final corpus even if the two funds' gross returns are similar - it's one of the few fund attributes you can compare with total certainty upfront, unlike future returns, since the fee is contractually fixed rather than a historical estimate.
Which fund carries more risk, Franklin India Aggressive Hybrid Fund or quant Aggressive Hybrid Fund-?
By standard deviation (a measure of how much a fund's returns swing around its own average), quant Aggressive Hybrid Fund- has been more volatile than Franklin India Aggressive Hybrid Fund over the trailing window. Standard deviation captures total volatility in both directions - up and down - so a higher figure means bigger swings generally, not necessarily bigger losses specifically. Sharpe ratio (0.05 for Franklin India Aggressive Hybrid Fund vs 0.31 for quant Aggressive Hybrid Fund-) is a better single measure of risk-adjusted return, since it weighs the return earned per unit of volatility taken rather than volatility alone.
Which has higher AUM, Franklin India Aggressive Hybrid Fund or quant Aggressive Hybrid Fund-?
Franklin India Aggressive Hybrid Fund has ₹2,204 Cr in assets under management, versus ₹2,049 Cr for quant Aggressive Hybrid Fund-. A larger AUM generally means deeper liquidity and lower per-unit fixed costs for the AMC to spread across investors, but an AUM that's very large relative to a fund's category and strategy (especially in small/mid cap categories, where the investable universe is smaller) can also make it harder for a manager to enter and exit positions without moving the price - bigger isn't automatically better, especially for less liquid categories.
Which has a higher yield to maturity (YTM), Franklin India Aggressive Hybrid Fund or quant Aggressive Hybrid Fund-?
Franklin India Aggressive Hybrid Fund's portfolio YTM (8.271%) is higher than quant Aggressive Hybrid Fund-'s. YTM is the weighted-average return a debt fund's current bond holdings would earn if held to maturity, assuming no defaults and coupons reinvested at the same rate - a useful forward-looking yield estimate for debt funds the way rolling CAGR is for equity funds, though it's an estimate based on today's portfolio, not a guaranteed return, and can move as bonds are bought/sold or as interest rates change.
Which fund has a longer track record, Franklin India Aggressive Hybrid Fund or quant Aggressive Hybrid Fund-?
Franklin India Aggressive Hybrid Fund launched on 1999-12-10, making it older than quant Aggressive Hybrid Fund- (launched 2001-02-19). A longer track record means more real market cycles (bull runs, corrections, rate cycles) the fund has actually navigated, which is useful context for judging consistency - but it isn't a guarantee of future performance, and a newer fund isn't automatically worse, especially if it's run by an experienced manager or team with a track record at a prior fund.
Data as of 2026-10-29. Source: AMFI disclosures via Punji. Not investment advice.