COMPARE
Franklin Asian Equity Fund - Direct - Growth vs LIC MF Infrastructure Fund-Direct Plan-Growth
Franklin Asian Equity Fund and LIC MF Infrastructure Fund- are both in the Sectoral/ Thematic category, from Franklin Templeton Asset Management (India) Private Limited and LIC Mutual Fund Asset Management Limited respectively. Franklin Asian Equity Fund has posted a higher 3-year rolling CAGR. Franklin Asian Equity Fund has the lower expense ratio. See the full table and FAQ below for the complete real-data comparison.
Basics
Franklin Asian Equity Fund has the lower direct-plan expense ratio, by 0.08 percentage points.
| Franklin Asian Equity Fund - Direct - Growth | LIC MF Infrastructure Fund-Direct Plan-Growth | |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Sectoral/ Thematic | Sectoral/ Thematic |
| AMC | Franklin Templeton Asset Management (India) Private Limited | LIC Mutual Fund Asset Management Limited |
| Benchmark | 75% MSCI Asia (Ex-Japan) Standard Index + 25% Nifty 500 Index | Nifty Infrastructure TRI |
| NAV | ₹46.3364 (2026-10-28) | ₹59.1519 (2026-10-28) |
| AUM | ₹901.01 Cr | ₹1,102.82 Cr |
| Expense Ratio (Direct) | 1.25% | 1.33% |
| Inception | 2007-11-19 | 2008-01-31 |
Returns
Franklin Asian Equity Fund leads on 3-year rolling CAGR (8.7% vs LIC MF Infrastructure Fund-'s 15.6%) - see the FAQ below for percentile context within each fund's own category.
Risk Metrics
LIC MF Infrastructure Fund- has been the more volatile of the two by standard deviation.
| Franklin Asian Equity Fund - Direct - Growth | LIC MF Infrastructure Fund-Direct Plan-Growth | |
|---|---|---|
| 3Y Sharpe Ratio | 0.83 | 0.58 |
| 3Y Alpha | 3.152% | 8.7418% |
| 3Y Std Deviation | 15.24% | 21.1543% |
| 3Y Calmar Ratio | 1.39 | 0.73 |
Portfolio Analytics
LIC MF Infrastructure Fund- carries the higher portfolio P/E ratio (a rougher proxy for how richly the underlying holdings are valued) - see the table below for the full comparison.
| Franklin Asian Equity Fund - Direct - Growth | LIC MF Infrastructure Fund-Direct Plan-Growth | |
|---|---|---|
| P/E Ratio | 27.9962 | 29.8606 |
| P/B Ratio | 15.3738 | 7.2862 |
| Dividend Yield | 0.9313% | 0.8311% |
| Active Share | - | 85.12% |
| Portfolio Turnover | 56.97% | 102% |
| YTM | - | - |
| Duration (Macaulay) | - | - |
Punji Fund Health Score
LIC MF Infrastructure Fund- has the stronger Punji Quality grade of the two.
Frequently asked questions
Which has a higher 3-year return, Franklin Asian Equity Fund or LIC MF Infrastructure Fund-?
Franklin Asian Equity Fund's 3-year rolling CAGR of 8.7% is higher than LIC MF Infrastructure Fund-'s 15.6%. Franklin Asian Equity Fund sits in the 3rd percentile of its category on this metric, versus the 34th percentile for LIC MF Infrastructure Fund- - though note both funds may belong to different categories with different medians, so a raw CAGR comparison doesn't account for how each fund performed relative to its own peers. A higher historical return also doesn't necessarily mean lower risk; check the risk metrics below before concluding either fund is the "better" choice.
Which has a lower expense ratio, Franklin Asian Equity Fund or LIC MF Infrastructure Fund-?
Franklin Asian Equity Fund's direct-plan expense ratio is 0.08 percentage points lower than LIC MF Infrastructure Fund-'s. Over long holding periods, a persistent expense-ratio gap compounds into a materially different final corpus even if the two funds' gross returns are similar - it's one of the few fund attributes you can compare with total certainty upfront, unlike future returns, since the fee is contractually fixed rather than a historical estimate.
Which fund carries more risk, Franklin Asian Equity Fund or LIC MF Infrastructure Fund-?
By standard deviation (a measure of how much a fund's returns swing around its own average), LIC MF Infrastructure Fund- has been more volatile than Franklin Asian Equity Fund over the trailing window. Standard deviation captures total volatility in both directions - up and down - so a higher figure means bigger swings generally, not necessarily bigger losses specifically. Sharpe ratio (0.83 for Franklin Asian Equity Fund vs 0.58 for LIC MF Infrastructure Fund-) is a better single measure of risk-adjusted return, since it weighs the return earned per unit of volatility taken rather than volatility alone.
Which has higher AUM, Franklin Asian Equity Fund or LIC MF Infrastructure Fund-?
LIC MF Infrastructure Fund- has ₹1,103 Cr in assets under management, versus ₹901 Cr for Franklin Asian Equity Fund. A larger AUM generally means deeper liquidity and lower per-unit fixed costs for the AMC to spread across investors, but an AUM that's very large relative to a fund's category and strategy (especially in small/mid cap categories, where the investable universe is smaller) can also make it harder for a manager to enter and exit positions without moving the price - bigger isn't automatically better, especially for less liquid categories.
Which fund has a longer track record, Franklin Asian Equity Fund or LIC MF Infrastructure Fund-?
Franklin Asian Equity Fund launched on 2007-11-19, making it older than LIC MF Infrastructure Fund- (launched 2008-01-31). A longer track record means more real market cycles (bull runs, corrections, rate cycles) the fund has actually navigated, which is useful context for judging consistency - but it isn't a guarantee of future performance, and a newer fund isn't automatically worse, especially if it's run by an experienced manager or team with a track record at a prior fund.
Data as of 2026-10-29. Source: AMFI disclosures via Punji. Not investment advice.