PunjiPUNJI

COMPARE

Edelweiss Nifty500 Multicap Momentum Quality 50 Index Fund - Direct - Growth vs Motilal Oswal BSE Enhanced Value Index Fund-Direct plan

Edelweiss Nifty500 Multicap Momentum Quality 50 Index Fund and Motilal Oswal BSE Enhanced Value Index Fund- are both in the Index Funds category, from Edelweiss Asset Management Limited and Motilal Oswal Asset Management Company Limited respectively. Motilal Oswal BSE Enhanced Value Index Fund- has the lower expense ratio. See the full table and FAQ below for the complete real-data comparison.

Basics

Motilal Oswal BSE Enhanced Value Index Fund- has the lower direct-plan expense ratio, by 0.23 percentage points.

Edelweiss Nifty500 Multicap Momentum Quality 50 Index Fund - Direct - GrowthMotilal Oswal BSE Enhanced Value Index Fund-Direct plan
CategoryIndex FundsIndex Funds
AMCEdelweiss Asset Management LimitedMotilal Oswal Asset Management Company Limited
BenchmarkNifty500 Multicap Momentum Quality 50 TRIBSE Enhanced Value Index TRI
NAV₹8.4965 (2026-10-28)₹25.3562 (2026-10-28)
AUM₹581.612 Cr₹2,120.84 Cr
Expense Ratio (Direct)0.75%0.52%
Inception2024-10-112022-07-29

Returns

Risk Metrics

This fund tracks an index, so measuring alpha against that same index would only report its tracking error.

Portfolio Analytics

Edelweiss Nifty500 Multicap Momentum Quality 50 Index Fund carries the higher portfolio P/E ratio (a rougher proxy for how richly the underlying holdings are valued) - see the table below for the full comparison.

Punji Fund Health Score

Edelweiss Nifty500 Multicap Momentum Quality 50 Index Fund has the stronger Punji Quality grade of the two.

Frequently asked questions

Which has a lower expense ratio, Edelweiss Nifty500 Multicap Momentum Quality 50 Index Fund or Motilal Oswal BSE Enhanced Value Index Fund-?

Motilal Oswal BSE Enhanced Value Index Fund-'s direct-plan expense ratio is 0.23 percentage points lower than Edelweiss Nifty500 Multicap Momentum Quality 50 Index Fund's. Over long holding periods, a persistent expense-ratio gap compounds into a materially different final corpus even if the two funds' gross returns are similar - it's one of the few fund attributes you can compare with total certainty upfront, unlike future returns, since the fee is contractually fixed rather than a historical estimate.

Why don't Edelweiss Nifty500 Multicap Momentum Quality 50 Index Fund and Motilal Oswal BSE Enhanced Value Index Fund- show risk metrics like Sharpe ratio or alpha?

This fund tracks an index, so measuring alpha against that same index would only report its tracking error. This is a deliberate methodology choice, not missing data - risk metrics like alpha and Sharpe ratio are most meaningful for actively-managed funds where a manager makes decisions that can add or subtract value versus a benchmark. For a fund that mechanically tracks an index, the equivalent useful metric is tracking error (how closely it follows its index), not alpha.

Which has higher AUM, Edelweiss Nifty500 Multicap Momentum Quality 50 Index Fund or Motilal Oswal BSE Enhanced Value Index Fund-?

Motilal Oswal BSE Enhanced Value Index Fund- has ₹2,121 Cr in assets under management, versus ₹582 Cr for Edelweiss Nifty500 Multicap Momentum Quality 50 Index Fund. A larger AUM generally means deeper liquidity and lower per-unit fixed costs for the AMC to spread across investors, but an AUM that's very large relative to a fund's category and strategy (especially in small/mid cap categories, where the investable universe is smaller) can also make it harder for a manager to enter and exit positions without moving the price - bigger isn't automatically better, especially for less liquid categories.

Which fund has a longer track record, Edelweiss Nifty500 Multicap Momentum Quality 50 Index Fund or Motilal Oswal BSE Enhanced Value Index Fund-?

Motilal Oswal BSE Enhanced Value Index Fund- launched on 2022-07-29, making it older than Edelweiss Nifty500 Multicap Momentum Quality 50 Index Fund (launched 2024-10-11). A longer track record means more real market cycles (bull runs, corrections, rate cycles) the fund has actually navigated, which is useful context for judging consistency - but it isn't a guarantee of future performance, and a newer fund isn't automatically worse, especially if it's run by an experienced manager or team with a track record at a prior fund.

Data as of 2026-10-29. Source: AMFI disclosures via Punji. Not investment advice.