COMPARE
Edelweiss Multi Cap Fund - Direct Plan - Growth vs HSBC Multi Cap Fund - Direct - Growth
Edelweiss Multi Cap Fund and HSBC Multi Cap Fund are both in the Multi Cap Fund category, from Edelweiss Asset Management Limited and HSBC Asset Management (India) Private Ltd. respectively. Edelweiss Multi Cap Fund has the lower expense ratio. See the full table and FAQ below for the complete real-data comparison.
Basics
Edelweiss Multi Cap Fund has the lower direct-plan expense ratio, by 0.10 percentage points.
| Edelweiss Multi Cap Fund - Direct Plan - Growth | HSBC Multi Cap Fund - Direct - Growth | |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Multi Cap Fund | Multi Cap Fund |
| AMC | Edelweiss Asset Management Limited | HSBC Asset Management (India) Private Ltd. |
| Benchmark | Nifty500 Multicap 50:25:25 TRI | Nifty500 Multicap 50:25:25 TRI |
| NAV | ₹15.5052 (2026-10-28) | ₹19.9012 (2026-10-28) |
| AUM | ₹3,282.414 Cr | ₹6,195.295 Cr |
| Expense Ratio (Direct) | 0.71% | 0.81% |
| Inception | 2023-10-04 | 2023-01-10 |
Returns
Risk Metrics
HSBC Multi Cap Fund has been the more volatile of the two by standard deviation.
| Edelweiss Multi Cap Fund - Direct Plan - Growth | HSBC Multi Cap Fund - Direct - Growth | |
|---|---|---|
| 3Y Sharpe Ratio | 0.44 | 0.43 |
| 3Y Alpha | 4.4249% | 4.6144% |
| 3Y Std Deviation | 15.2474% | 16.4182% |
| 3Y Calmar Ratio | 0.68 | 0.71 |
Portfolio Analytics
HSBC Multi Cap Fund carries the higher portfolio P/E ratio (a rougher proxy for how richly the underlying holdings are valued) - see the table below for the full comparison.
| Edelweiss Multi Cap Fund - Direct Plan - Growth | HSBC Multi Cap Fund - Direct - Growth | |
|---|---|---|
| P/E Ratio | 27.8135 | 30.5466 |
| P/B Ratio | - | - |
| Dividend Yield | 0.8605% | 0.7799% |
| Active Share | 64.44% | 66.25% |
| Portfolio Turnover | - | 49% |
| YTM | - | - |
| Duration (Macaulay) | - | - |
Punji Fund Health Score
Edelweiss Multi Cap Fund has the stronger Punji Quality grade of the two.
Frequently asked questions
Which has a lower expense ratio, Edelweiss Multi Cap Fund or HSBC Multi Cap Fund?
Edelweiss Multi Cap Fund's direct-plan expense ratio is 0.10 percentage points lower than HSBC Multi Cap Fund's. Over long holding periods, a persistent expense-ratio gap compounds into a materially different final corpus even if the two funds' gross returns are similar - it's one of the few fund attributes you can compare with total certainty upfront, unlike future returns, since the fee is contractually fixed rather than a historical estimate.
Which fund carries more risk, Edelweiss Multi Cap Fund or HSBC Multi Cap Fund?
By standard deviation (a measure of how much a fund's returns swing around its own average), HSBC Multi Cap Fund has been more volatile than Edelweiss Multi Cap Fund over the trailing window. Standard deviation captures total volatility in both directions - up and down - so a higher figure means bigger swings generally, not necessarily bigger losses specifically. Sharpe ratio (0.44 for Edelweiss Multi Cap Fund vs 0.43 for HSBC Multi Cap Fund) is a better single measure of risk-adjusted return, since it weighs the return earned per unit of volatility taken rather than volatility alone.
Which has higher AUM, Edelweiss Multi Cap Fund or HSBC Multi Cap Fund?
HSBC Multi Cap Fund has ₹6,195 Cr in assets under management, versus ₹3,282 Cr for Edelweiss Multi Cap Fund. A larger AUM generally means deeper liquidity and lower per-unit fixed costs for the AMC to spread across investors, but an AUM that's very large relative to a fund's category and strategy (especially in small/mid cap categories, where the investable universe is smaller) can also make it harder for a manager to enter and exit positions without moving the price - bigger isn't automatically better, especially for less liquid categories.
Which fund has a longer track record, Edelweiss Multi Cap Fund or HSBC Multi Cap Fund?
HSBC Multi Cap Fund launched on 2023-01-10, making it older than Edelweiss Multi Cap Fund (launched 2023-10-04). A longer track record means more real market cycles (bull runs, corrections, rate cycles) the fund has actually navigated, which is useful context for judging consistency - but it isn't a guarantee of future performance, and a newer fund isn't automatically worse, especially if it's run by an experienced manager or team with a track record at a prior fund.
Data as of 2026-10-29. Source: AMFI disclosures via Punji. Not investment advice.