PunjiPUNJI

COMPARE

Edelweiss Mid Cap Fund - Direct Plan - Growth Option vs Helios Mid Cap Fund - Direct Plan - Growth Option

Edelweiss Mid Cap Fund and Helios Mid Cap Fund are both in the Mid Cap Fund category, from Edelweiss Asset Management Limited and Helios Capital Asset Management (India) Pvt. Ltd. respectively. Edelweiss Mid Cap Fund has the lower expense ratio. See the full table and FAQ below for the complete real-data comparison.

Basics

Edelweiss Mid Cap Fund has the lower direct-plan expense ratio, by 0.30 percentage points.

Edelweiss Mid Cap Fund - Direct Plan - Growth OptionHelios Mid Cap Fund - Direct Plan - Growth Option
CategoryMid Cap FundMid Cap Fund
AMCEdelweiss Asset Management LimitedHelios Capital Asset Management (India) Pvt. Ltd.
BenchmarkNifty Midcap 150 TRINifty Midcap 150 TRI
NAV₹119.089 (2026-10-28)₹13.17 (2026-10-28)
AUM₹18,551.635 Cr₹2,350.609 Cr
Expense Ratio (Direct)0.68%0.98%
Inception2007-11-092025-02-20

Returns

Risk Metrics

This fund is less than three years old, so a three-year risk history does not exist yet.

Portfolio Analytics

Helios Mid Cap Fund carries the higher portfolio P/E ratio (a rougher proxy for how richly the underlying holdings are valued) - see the table below for the full comparison.

Punji Fund Health Score

Helios Mid Cap Fund has the stronger Punji Quality grade of the two.

Frequently asked questions

Which has a lower expense ratio, Edelweiss Mid Cap Fund or Helios Mid Cap Fund?

Edelweiss Mid Cap Fund's direct-plan expense ratio is 0.30 percentage points lower than Helios Mid Cap Fund's. Over long holding periods, a persistent expense-ratio gap compounds into a materially different final corpus even if the two funds' gross returns are similar - it's one of the few fund attributes you can compare with total certainty upfront, unlike future returns, since the fee is contractually fixed rather than a historical estimate.

Why don't Edelweiss Mid Cap Fund and Helios Mid Cap Fund show risk metrics like Sharpe ratio or alpha?

This fund is less than three years old, so a three-year risk history does not exist yet. This is a deliberate methodology choice, not missing data - risk metrics like alpha and Sharpe ratio are most meaningful for actively-managed funds where a manager makes decisions that can add or subtract value versus a benchmark. For a fund that mechanically tracks an index, the equivalent useful metric is tracking error (how closely it follows its index), not alpha.

Which has higher AUM, Edelweiss Mid Cap Fund or Helios Mid Cap Fund?

Edelweiss Mid Cap Fund has ₹18,552 Cr in assets under management, versus ₹2,351 Cr for Helios Mid Cap Fund. A larger AUM generally means deeper liquidity and lower per-unit fixed costs for the AMC to spread across investors, but an AUM that's very large relative to a fund's category and strategy (especially in small/mid cap categories, where the investable universe is smaller) can also make it harder for a manager to enter and exit positions without moving the price - bigger isn't automatically better, especially for less liquid categories.

Which fund has a longer track record, Edelweiss Mid Cap Fund or Helios Mid Cap Fund?

Edelweiss Mid Cap Fund launched on 2007-11-09, making it older than Helios Mid Cap Fund (launched 2025-02-20). A longer track record means more real market cycles (bull runs, corrections, rate cycles) the fund has actually navigated, which is useful context for judging consistency - but it isn't a guarantee of future performance, and a newer fund isn't automatically worse, especially if it's run by an experienced manager or team with a track record at a prior fund.

Data as of 2026-10-29. Source: AMFI disclosures via Punji. Not investment advice.