COMPARE
Edelweiss Europe Dynamic Equity Offshore Fund - Growth Option - Direct Plan vs Navi NASDAQ100 US Specific Equity Passive FOF- Direct- Growth
Edelweiss Europe Dynamic Equity Offshore Fund and Navi NASDAQ100 US Specific Equity Passive FOF- Direct- Growth are both in the FoF Overseas category, from Edelweiss Asset Management Limited and Navi AMC Limited respectively. Navi NASDAQ100 US Specific Equity Passive FOF- Direct- Growth has posted a higher 3-year rolling CAGR. Navi NASDAQ100 US Specific Equity Passive FOF- Direct- Growth has the lower expense ratio. See the full table and FAQ below for the complete real-data comparison.
Basics
Navi NASDAQ100 US Specific Equity Passive FOF- Direct- Growth has the lower direct-plan expense ratio, by 0.42 percentage points.
| Edelweiss Europe Dynamic Equity Offshore Fund - Growth Option - Direct Plan | Navi NASDAQ100 US Specific Equity Passive FOF- Direct- Growth | |
|---|---|---|
| Category | FoF Overseas | FoF Overseas |
| AMC | Edelweiss Asset Management Limited | Navi AMC Limited |
| Benchmark | MSCI Europe Index (IEUR ETF) | NASDAQ 100 (INR) |
| NAV | ₹33.114 (2026-10-28) | ₹25.3291 (2026-10-28) |
| AUM | ₹265.602 Cr | ₹1,210.78 Cr |
| Expense Ratio (Direct) | 0.68% | 0.26% |
| Inception | 2014-01-17 | 2022-03-03 |
Returns
Navi NASDAQ100 US Specific Equity Passive FOF- Direct- Growth leads on 3-year rolling CAGR (31.5% vs Edelweiss Europe Dynamic Equity Offshore Fund's 10.4%) - see the FAQ below for percentile context within each fund's own category.
Risk Metrics
Navi NASDAQ100 US Specific Equity Passive FOF- Direct- Growth has been the more volatile of the two by standard deviation.
Portfolio Analytics
Punji Fund Health Score
Edelweiss Europe Dynamic Equity Offshore Fund and Navi NASDAQ100 US Specific Equity Passive FOF- Direct- Growth carry the same Punji Quality grade.
Frequently asked questions
Which has a higher 3-year return, Edelweiss Europe Dynamic Equity Offshore Fund or Navi NASDAQ100 US Specific Equity Passive FOF- Direct- Growth?
Navi NASDAQ100 US Specific Equity Passive FOF- Direct- Growth's 3-year rolling CAGR of 31.5% is higher than Edelweiss Europe Dynamic Equity Offshore Fund's 10.4%. Navi NASDAQ100 US Specific Equity Passive FOF- Direct- Growth sits in the 96th percentile of its category on this metric, versus the 43rd percentile for Edelweiss Europe Dynamic Equity Offshore Fund - though note both funds may belong to different categories with different medians, so a raw CAGR comparison doesn't account for how each fund performed relative to its own peers. A higher historical return also doesn't necessarily mean lower risk; check the risk metrics below before concluding either fund is the "better" choice.
Which has a lower expense ratio, Edelweiss Europe Dynamic Equity Offshore Fund or Navi NASDAQ100 US Specific Equity Passive FOF- Direct- Growth?
Navi NASDAQ100 US Specific Equity Passive FOF- Direct- Growth's direct-plan expense ratio is 0.42 percentage points lower than Edelweiss Europe Dynamic Equity Offshore Fund's. Over long holding periods, a persistent expense-ratio gap compounds into a materially different final corpus even if the two funds' gross returns are similar - it's one of the few fund attributes you can compare with total certainty upfront, unlike future returns, since the fee is contractually fixed rather than a historical estimate.
Which fund carries more risk, Edelweiss Europe Dynamic Equity Offshore Fund or Navi NASDAQ100 US Specific Equity Passive FOF- Direct- Growth?
By standard deviation (a measure of how much a fund's returns swing around its own average), Navi NASDAQ100 US Specific Equity Passive FOF- Direct- Growth has been more volatile than Edelweiss Europe Dynamic Equity Offshore Fund over the trailing window. Standard deviation captures total volatility in both directions - up and down - so a higher figure means bigger swings generally, not necessarily bigger losses specifically. Sharpe ratio (1.18 for Edelweiss Europe Dynamic Equity Offshore Fund vs 1.17 for Navi NASDAQ100 US Specific Equity Passive FOF- Direct- Growth) is a better single measure of risk-adjusted return, since it weighs the return earned per unit of volatility taken rather than volatility alone.
Which has higher AUM, Edelweiss Europe Dynamic Equity Offshore Fund or Navi NASDAQ100 US Specific Equity Passive FOF- Direct- Growth?
Navi NASDAQ100 US Specific Equity Passive FOF- Direct- Growth has ₹1,211 Cr in assets under management, versus ₹266 Cr for Edelweiss Europe Dynamic Equity Offshore Fund. A larger AUM generally means deeper liquidity and lower per-unit fixed costs for the AMC to spread across investors, but an AUM that's very large relative to a fund's category and strategy (especially in small/mid cap categories, where the investable universe is smaller) can also make it harder for a manager to enter and exit positions without moving the price - bigger isn't automatically better, especially for less liquid categories.
Which fund has a longer track record, Edelweiss Europe Dynamic Equity Offshore Fund or Navi NASDAQ100 US Specific Equity Passive FOF- Direct- Growth?
Edelweiss Europe Dynamic Equity Offshore Fund launched on 2014-01-17, making it older than Navi NASDAQ100 US Specific Equity Passive FOF- Direct- Growth (launched 2022-03-03). A longer track record means more real market cycles (bull runs, corrections, rate cycles) the fund has actually navigated, which is useful context for judging consistency - but it isn't a guarantee of future performance, and a newer fund isn't automatically worse, especially if it's run by an experienced manager or team with a track record at a prior fund.
Data as of 2026-10-29. Source: AMFI disclosures via Punji. Not investment advice.