COMPARE
Edelweiss Arbitrage Fund- Direct Plan- Growth Option vs Mirae Asset Arbitrage Fund - Direct Plan - Growth
Edelweiss Arbitrage Fund- and Mirae Asset Arbitrage Fund are both in the Arbitrage Fund category, from Edelweiss Asset Management Limited and Mirae Asset Investment Managers (India) Pvt. Ltd respectively. Mirae Asset Arbitrage Fund has posted a higher 3-year rolling CAGR. Edelweiss Arbitrage Fund- has the lower expense ratio. See the full table and FAQ below for the complete real-data comparison.
Basics
Edelweiss Arbitrage Fund- has the lower direct-plan expense ratio, by 0.99 percentage points.
| Edelweiss Arbitrage Fund- Direct Plan- Growth Option | Mirae Asset Arbitrage Fund - Direct Plan - Growth | |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Arbitrage Fund | Arbitrage Fund |
| AMC | Edelweiss Asset Management Limited | Mirae Asset Investment Managers (India) Pvt. Ltd |
| Benchmark | Nifty 50 Arbitrage | Nifty 50 Arbitrage |
| NAV | ₹22.6096 (2026-10-28) | ₹14.694 (2026-10-28) |
| AUM | ₹14,244.907 Cr | ₹3,683.906 Cr |
| Expense Ratio (Direct) | 1.58% | 2.57% |
| Inception | 2014-06-12 | 2020-06-03 |
Returns
Mirae Asset Arbitrage Fund leads on 3-year rolling CAGR (7.1% vs Edelweiss Arbitrage Fund-'s 6.8%) - see the FAQ below for percentile context within each fund's own category.
Risk Metrics
Arbitrage funds target a small, steady spread rather than market returns, so beta and alpha against an equity index describe nothing useful.
Portfolio Analytics
Edelweiss Arbitrage Fund- carries the higher portfolio YTM.
| Edelweiss Arbitrage Fund- Direct Plan- Growth Option | Mirae Asset Arbitrage Fund - Direct Plan - Growth | |
|---|---|---|
| P/E Ratio | 17.3769 | 21.0543 |
| P/B Ratio | 6.8044 | 9.0945 |
| Dividend Yield | 1.3372% | 1.243% |
| Active Share | - | - |
| Portfolio Turnover | - | 1793% |
| YTM | 6.38% | 5.49% |
| Duration (Macaulay) | 0.45 yrs | 0.18 yrs |
Punji Fund Health Score
Edelweiss Arbitrage Fund- and Mirae Asset Arbitrage Fund carry the same Punji Quality grade.
Frequently asked questions
Which has a higher 3-year return, Edelweiss Arbitrage Fund- or Mirae Asset Arbitrage Fund?
Mirae Asset Arbitrage Fund's 3-year rolling CAGR of 7.1% is higher than Edelweiss Arbitrage Fund-'s 6.8%. Mirae Asset Arbitrage Fund sits in the 85th percentile of its category on this metric, versus the 73rd percentile for Edelweiss Arbitrage Fund- - though note both funds may belong to different categories with different medians, so a raw CAGR comparison doesn't account for how each fund performed relative to its own peers. A higher historical return also doesn't necessarily mean lower risk; check the risk metrics below before concluding either fund is the "better" choice.
Which has a lower expense ratio, Edelweiss Arbitrage Fund- or Mirae Asset Arbitrage Fund?
Edelweiss Arbitrage Fund-'s direct-plan expense ratio is 0.99 percentage points lower than Mirae Asset Arbitrage Fund's. Over long holding periods, a persistent expense-ratio gap compounds into a materially different final corpus even if the two funds' gross returns are similar - it's one of the few fund attributes you can compare with total certainty upfront, unlike future returns, since the fee is contractually fixed rather than a historical estimate.
Why don't Edelweiss Arbitrage Fund- and Mirae Asset Arbitrage Fund show risk metrics like Sharpe ratio or alpha?
Arbitrage funds target a small, steady spread rather than market returns, so beta and alpha against an equity index describe nothing useful. This is a deliberate methodology choice, not missing data - risk metrics like alpha and Sharpe ratio are most meaningful for actively-managed funds where a manager makes decisions that can add or subtract value versus a benchmark. For a fund that mechanically tracks an index, the equivalent useful metric is tracking error (how closely it follows its index), not alpha.
Which has higher AUM, Edelweiss Arbitrage Fund- or Mirae Asset Arbitrage Fund?
Edelweiss Arbitrage Fund- has ₹14,245 Cr in assets under management, versus ₹3,684 Cr for Mirae Asset Arbitrage Fund. A larger AUM generally means deeper liquidity and lower per-unit fixed costs for the AMC to spread across investors, but an AUM that's very large relative to a fund's category and strategy (especially in small/mid cap categories, where the investable universe is smaller) can also make it harder for a manager to enter and exit positions without moving the price - bigger isn't automatically better, especially for less liquid categories.
Which has a higher yield to maturity (YTM), Edelweiss Arbitrage Fund- or Mirae Asset Arbitrage Fund?
Edelweiss Arbitrage Fund-'s portfolio YTM (6.38%) is higher than Mirae Asset Arbitrage Fund's. YTM is the weighted-average return a debt fund's current bond holdings would earn if held to maturity, assuming no defaults and coupons reinvested at the same rate - a useful forward-looking yield estimate for debt funds the way rolling CAGR is for equity funds, though it's an estimate based on today's portfolio, not a guaranteed return, and can move as bonds are bought/sold or as interest rates change.
Which has longer duration (more interest-rate sensitivity), Edelweiss Arbitrage Fund- or Mirae Asset Arbitrage Fund?
Edelweiss Arbitrage Fund- has the longer Macaulay duration of the two, meaning its NAV is more sensitive to interest-rate changes - a longer-duration debt fund tends to gain more when rates fall and lose more when rates rise, compared to a shorter-duration fund. Duration is expressed in years but isn't literally about how long you hold the fund; it's a measure of price sensitivity to rate moves. If you expect rates to fall, the longer-duration fund benefits more; if you expect rates to rise or want to minimize that swing, the shorter-duration fund is the more conservative pick.
Which fund has a longer track record, Edelweiss Arbitrage Fund- or Mirae Asset Arbitrage Fund?
Edelweiss Arbitrage Fund- launched on 2014-06-12, making it older than Mirae Asset Arbitrage Fund (launched 2020-06-03). A longer track record means more real market cycles (bull runs, corrections, rate cycles) the fund has actually navigated, which is useful context for judging consistency - but it isn't a guarantee of future performance, and a newer fund isn't automatically worse, especially if it's run by an experienced manager or team with a track record at a prior fund.
Data as of 2026-10-29. Source: AMFI disclosures via Punji. Not investment advice.