COMPARE
Edelweiss Aggressive Hybrid Fund-Direct Plan-Growth Option vs ICICI Prudential Aggressive Hybrid Fund - Direct Plan - Growth
Edelweiss Aggressive Hybrid Fund- and ICICI Prudential Aggressive Hybrid Fund are both in the Aggressive Hybrid Fund category, from Edelweiss Asset Management Limited and ICICI Prudential Asset Management Company Limited respectively. ICICI Prudential Aggressive Hybrid Fund has posted a higher 3-year rolling CAGR. Edelweiss Aggressive Hybrid Fund- has the lower expense ratio. See the full table and FAQ below for the complete real-data comparison.
Basics
Edelweiss Aggressive Hybrid Fund- has the lower direct-plan expense ratio, by 0.37 percentage points.
| Edelweiss Aggressive Hybrid Fund-Direct Plan-Growth Option | ICICI Prudential Aggressive Hybrid Fund - Direct Plan - Growth | |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Aggressive Hybrid Fund | Aggressive Hybrid Fund |
| AMC | Edelweiss Asset Management Limited | ICICI Prudential Asset Management Company Limited |
| Benchmark | CRISIL Hybrid 35+65 - Aggressive Index | CRISIL Hybrid 35+65 - Aggressive Index |
| NAV | ₹73.28 (2026-10-28) | ₹430.83 (2026-10-28) |
| AUM | ₹3,834.837 Cr | ₹49,689.25 Cr |
| Expense Ratio (Direct) | 0.7% | 1.07% |
| Inception | 2009-06-08 | 2000-01-01 |
Returns
ICICI Prudential Aggressive Hybrid Fund leads on 3-year rolling CAGR (18.2% vs Edelweiss Aggressive Hybrid Fund-'s 15.7%) - see the FAQ below for percentile context within each fund's own category.
Risk Metrics
Edelweiss Aggressive Hybrid Fund- has been the more volatile of the two by standard deviation.
| Edelweiss Aggressive Hybrid Fund-Direct Plan-Growth Option | ICICI Prudential Aggressive Hybrid Fund - Direct Plan - Growth | |
|---|---|---|
| 3Y Sharpe Ratio | 0.39 | 0.41 |
| 3Y Alpha | 3.2924% | 3.3315% |
| 3Y Std Deviation | 10.2574% | 9.6806% |
| 3Y Calmar Ratio | 0.92 | 0.99 |
Portfolio Analytics
ICICI Prudential Aggressive Hybrid Fund carries the higher portfolio YTM.
Punji Fund Health Score
ICICI Prudential Aggressive Hybrid Fund has the stronger Punji Quality grade of the two.
Frequently asked questions
Which has a higher 3-year return, Edelweiss Aggressive Hybrid Fund- or ICICI Prudential Aggressive Hybrid Fund?
ICICI Prudential Aggressive Hybrid Fund's 3-year rolling CAGR of 18.2% is higher than Edelweiss Aggressive Hybrid Fund-'s 15.7%. ICICI Prudential Aggressive Hybrid Fund sits in the 93rd percentile of its category on this metric, versus the 83rd percentile for Edelweiss Aggressive Hybrid Fund- - though note both funds may belong to different categories with different medians, so a raw CAGR comparison doesn't account for how each fund performed relative to its own peers. A higher historical return also doesn't necessarily mean lower risk; check the risk metrics below before concluding either fund is the "better" choice.
Which has a lower expense ratio, Edelweiss Aggressive Hybrid Fund- or ICICI Prudential Aggressive Hybrid Fund?
Edelweiss Aggressive Hybrid Fund-'s direct-plan expense ratio is 0.37 percentage points lower than ICICI Prudential Aggressive Hybrid Fund's. Over long holding periods, a persistent expense-ratio gap compounds into a materially different final corpus even if the two funds' gross returns are similar - it's one of the few fund attributes you can compare with total certainty upfront, unlike future returns, since the fee is contractually fixed rather than a historical estimate.
Which fund carries more risk, Edelweiss Aggressive Hybrid Fund- or ICICI Prudential Aggressive Hybrid Fund?
By standard deviation (a measure of how much a fund's returns swing around its own average), Edelweiss Aggressive Hybrid Fund- has been more volatile than ICICI Prudential Aggressive Hybrid Fund over the trailing window. Standard deviation captures total volatility in both directions - up and down - so a higher figure means bigger swings generally, not necessarily bigger losses specifically. Sharpe ratio (0.39 for Edelweiss Aggressive Hybrid Fund- vs 0.41 for ICICI Prudential Aggressive Hybrid Fund) is a better single measure of risk-adjusted return, since it weighs the return earned per unit of volatility taken rather than volatility alone.
Which has higher AUM, Edelweiss Aggressive Hybrid Fund- or ICICI Prudential Aggressive Hybrid Fund?
ICICI Prudential Aggressive Hybrid Fund has ₹49,689 Cr in assets under management, versus ₹3,835 Cr for Edelweiss Aggressive Hybrid Fund-. A larger AUM generally means deeper liquidity and lower per-unit fixed costs for the AMC to spread across investors, but an AUM that's very large relative to a fund's category and strategy (especially in small/mid cap categories, where the investable universe is smaller) can also make it harder for a manager to enter and exit positions without moving the price - bigger isn't automatically better, especially for less liquid categories.
Which has a higher yield to maturity (YTM), Edelweiss Aggressive Hybrid Fund- or ICICI Prudential Aggressive Hybrid Fund?
ICICI Prudential Aggressive Hybrid Fund's portfolio YTM (8.0269%) is higher than Edelweiss Aggressive Hybrid Fund-'s. YTM is the weighted-average return a debt fund's current bond holdings would earn if held to maturity, assuming no defaults and coupons reinvested at the same rate - a useful forward-looking yield estimate for debt funds the way rolling CAGR is for equity funds, though it's an estimate based on today's portfolio, not a guaranteed return, and can move as bonds are bought/sold or as interest rates change.
Which fund has a longer track record, Edelweiss Aggressive Hybrid Fund- or ICICI Prudential Aggressive Hybrid Fund?
ICICI Prudential Aggressive Hybrid Fund launched on 2000-01-01, making it older than Edelweiss Aggressive Hybrid Fund- (launched 2009-06-08). A longer track record means more real market cycles (bull runs, corrections, rate cycles) the fund has actually navigated, which is useful context for judging consistency - but it isn't a guarantee of future performance, and a newer fund isn't automatically worse, especially if it's run by an experienced manager or team with a track record at a prior fund.
Data as of 2026-10-29. Source: AMFI disclosures via Punji. Not investment advice.