PunjiPUNJI

COMPARE

DSP Focused Fund - Direct Plan - Growth vs Union Focused Fund - Direct Plan - Growth Option

DSP Focused Fund and Union Focused Fund are both in the Focused Fund category, from DSP Asset Managers Private Limited and Union Asset Management Company Private Limited respectively. Union Focused Fund has posted a higher 3-year rolling CAGR. DSP Focused Fund has the lower expense ratio. See the full table and FAQ below for the complete real-data comparison.

Basics

DSP Focused Fund has the lower direct-plan expense ratio, by 0.46 percentage points.

DSP Focused Fund - Direct Plan - GrowthUnion Focused Fund - Direct Plan - Growth Option
CategoryFocused FundFocused Fund
AMCDSP Asset Managers Private LimitedUnion Asset Management Company Private Limited
BenchmarkNifty 500 TRIBSE 500 TRI
NAV₹59.461 (2026-10-28)₹28.26 (2026-10-28)
AUM₹2,478.791 Cr₹423.126 Cr
Expense Ratio (Direct)1.11%1.57%
Inception2010-04-232019-07-15

Returns

Union Focused Fund leads on 3-year rolling CAGR (16.0% vs DSP Focused Fund's 15.1%) - see the FAQ below for percentile context within each fund's own category.

Risk Metrics

DSP Focused Fund has been the more volatile of the two by standard deviation.

Portfolio Analytics

Union Focused Fund carries the higher portfolio P/E ratio (a rougher proxy for how richly the underlying holdings are valued) - see the table below for the full comparison.

Punji Fund Health Score

DSP Focused Fund and Union Focused Fund carry the same Punji Quality grade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has a higher 3-year return, DSP Focused Fund or Union Focused Fund?

Union Focused Fund's 3-year rolling CAGR of 16.0% is higher than DSP Focused Fund's 15.1%. Union Focused Fund sits in the 37th percentile of its category on this metric, versus the 26th percentile for DSP Focused Fund - though note both funds may belong to different categories with different medians, so a raw CAGR comparison doesn't account for how each fund performed relative to its own peers. A higher historical return also doesn't necessarily mean lower risk; check the risk metrics below before concluding either fund is the "better" choice.

Which has a lower expense ratio, DSP Focused Fund or Union Focused Fund?

DSP Focused Fund's direct-plan expense ratio is 0.46 percentage points lower than Union Focused Fund's. Over long holding periods, a persistent expense-ratio gap compounds into a materially different final corpus even if the two funds' gross returns are similar - it's one of the few fund attributes you can compare with total certainty upfront, unlike future returns, since the fee is contractually fixed rather than a historical estimate.

Which fund carries more risk, DSP Focused Fund or Union Focused Fund?

By standard deviation (a measure of how much a fund's returns swing around its own average), DSP Focused Fund has been more volatile than Union Focused Fund over the trailing window. Standard deviation captures total volatility in both directions - up and down - so a higher figure means bigger swings generally, not necessarily bigger losses specifically. Sharpe ratio (0.26 for DSP Focused Fund vs 0.13 for Union Focused Fund) is a better single measure of risk-adjusted return, since it weighs the return earned per unit of volatility taken rather than volatility alone.

Which has higher AUM, DSP Focused Fund or Union Focused Fund?

DSP Focused Fund has ₹2,479 Cr in assets under management, versus ₹423 Cr for Union Focused Fund. A larger AUM generally means deeper liquidity and lower per-unit fixed costs for the AMC to spread across investors, but an AUM that's very large relative to a fund's category and strategy (especially in small/mid cap categories, where the investable universe is smaller) can also make it harder for a manager to enter and exit positions without moving the price - bigger isn't automatically better, especially for less liquid categories.

Which fund has a longer track record, DSP Focused Fund or Union Focused Fund?

DSP Focused Fund launched on 2010-04-23, making it older than Union Focused Fund (launched 2019-07-15). A longer track record means more real market cycles (bull runs, corrections, rate cycles) the fund has actually navigated, which is useful context for judging consistency - but it isn't a guarantee of future performance, and a newer fund isn't automatically worse, especially if it's run by an experienced manager or team with a track record at a prior fund.

Data as of 2026-10-29. Source: AMFI disclosures via Punji. Not investment advice.