PunjiPUNJI

COMPARE

DSP Flexi Cap Fund - Direct Plan - Growth vs ITI Flexi Cap Fund- Direct Plan- Growth

DSP Flexi Cap Fund and ITI Flexi Cap Fund- are both in the Flexi Cap Fund category, from DSP Asset Managers Private Limited and ITI Asset Management Limited respectively. ITI Flexi Cap Fund- has posted a higher 3-year rolling CAGR. DSP Flexi Cap Fund has the lower expense ratio. See the full table and FAQ below for the complete real-data comparison.

Basics

DSP Flexi Cap Fund has the lower direct-plan expense ratio, by 0.03 percentage points.

DSP Flexi Cap Fund - Direct Plan - GrowthITI Flexi Cap Fund- Direct Plan- Growth
CategoryFlexi Cap FundFlexi Cap Fund
AMCDSP Asset Managers Private LimitedITI Asset Management Limited
BenchmarkNifty 500 TRINifty 500 TRI
NAV₹109.379 (2026-10-28)₹20.2347 (2026-10-28)
AUM₹11,524.418 Cr₹1,581.63 Cr
Expense Ratio (Direct)0.88%0.91%
Inception1997-04-042023-01-27

Returns

ITI Flexi Cap Fund- leads on 3-year rolling CAGR (20.4% vs DSP Flexi Cap Fund's 16.1%) - see the FAQ below for percentile context within each fund's own category.

Risk Metrics

ITI Flexi Cap Fund- has been the more volatile of the two by standard deviation.

Portfolio Analytics

ITI Flexi Cap Fund- carries the higher portfolio P/E ratio (a rougher proxy for how richly the underlying holdings are valued) - see the table below for the full comparison.

Punji Fund Health Score

ITI Flexi Cap Fund- has the stronger Punji Quality grade of the two.

Frequently asked questions

Which has a higher 3-year return, DSP Flexi Cap Fund or ITI Flexi Cap Fund-?

ITI Flexi Cap Fund-'s 3-year rolling CAGR of 20.4% is higher than DSP Flexi Cap Fund's 16.1%. ITI Flexi Cap Fund- sits in the 94th percentile of its category on this metric, versus the 44th percentile for DSP Flexi Cap Fund - though note both funds may belong to different categories with different medians, so a raw CAGR comparison doesn't account for how each fund performed relative to its own peers. A higher historical return also doesn't necessarily mean lower risk; check the risk metrics below before concluding either fund is the "better" choice.

Which has a lower expense ratio, DSP Flexi Cap Fund or ITI Flexi Cap Fund-?

DSP Flexi Cap Fund's direct-plan expense ratio is 0.03 percentage points lower than ITI Flexi Cap Fund-'s. Over long holding periods, a persistent expense-ratio gap compounds into a materially different final corpus even if the two funds' gross returns are similar - it's one of the few fund attributes you can compare with total certainty upfront, unlike future returns, since the fee is contractually fixed rather than a historical estimate.

Which fund carries more risk, DSP Flexi Cap Fund or ITI Flexi Cap Fund-?

By standard deviation (a measure of how much a fund's returns swing around its own average), ITI Flexi Cap Fund- has been more volatile than DSP Flexi Cap Fund over the trailing window. Standard deviation captures total volatility in both directions - up and down - so a higher figure means bigger swings generally, not necessarily bigger losses specifically. Sharpe ratio (0.11 for DSP Flexi Cap Fund vs 0.56 for ITI Flexi Cap Fund-) is a better single measure of risk-adjusted return, since it weighs the return earned per unit of volatility taken rather than volatility alone.

Which has higher AUM, DSP Flexi Cap Fund or ITI Flexi Cap Fund-?

DSP Flexi Cap Fund has ₹11,524 Cr in assets under management, versus ₹1,582 Cr for ITI Flexi Cap Fund-. A larger AUM generally means deeper liquidity and lower per-unit fixed costs for the AMC to spread across investors, but an AUM that's very large relative to a fund's category and strategy (especially in small/mid cap categories, where the investable universe is smaller) can also make it harder for a manager to enter and exit positions without moving the price - bigger isn't automatically better, especially for less liquid categories.

Which fund has a longer track record, DSP Flexi Cap Fund or ITI Flexi Cap Fund-?

DSP Flexi Cap Fund launched on 1997-04-04, making it older than ITI Flexi Cap Fund- (launched 2023-01-27). A longer track record means more real market cycles (bull runs, corrections, rate cycles) the fund has actually navigated, which is useful context for judging consistency - but it isn't a guarantee of future performance, and a newer fund isn't automatically worse, especially if it's run by an experienced manager or team with a track record at a prior fund.

Data as of 2026-10-29. Source: AMFI disclosures via Punji. Not investment advice.