COMPARE
DSP Banking & Financial Services Fund - Direct - Growth vs Invesco India Technology Fund - Direct Plan - Growth
DSP Banking & Financial Services Fund and Invesco India Technology Fund are both in the Sectoral Fund category, from DSP Asset Managers Private Limited and Invesco Asset Management (India) Private Limited respectively. DSP Banking & Financial Services Fund has the lower expense ratio. See the full table and FAQ below for the complete real-data comparison.
Basics
DSP Banking & Financial Services Fund has the lower direct-plan expense ratio, by 0.21 percentage points.
| DSP Banking & Financial Services Fund - Direct - Growth | Invesco India Technology Fund - Direct Plan - Growth | |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Sectoral Fund | Sectoral Fund |
| AMC | DSP Asset Managers Private Limited | Invesco Asset Management (India) Private Limited |
| Benchmark | Nifty Financial Services TRI | Nifty IT TRI |
| NAV | ₹14.117 (2026-10-28) | ₹10.17 (2026-10-28) |
| AUM | ₹2,014.128 Cr | ₹341 Cr |
| Expense Ratio (Direct) | 0.81% | 1.02% |
| Inception | 2023-11-20 | 2024-09-03 |
Returns
Risk Metrics
This fund is less than three years old, so a three-year risk history does not exist yet.
Portfolio Analytics
Invesco India Technology Fund carries the higher portfolio P/E ratio (a rougher proxy for how richly the underlying holdings are valued) - see the table below for the full comparison.
| DSP Banking & Financial Services Fund - Direct - Growth | Invesco India Technology Fund - Direct Plan - Growth | |
|---|---|---|
| P/E Ratio | 19.7956 | 31.9067 |
| P/B Ratio | - | 4.4922 |
| Dividend Yield | 0.7625% | 1.2432% |
| Active Share | 53.04% | 67.56% |
| Portfolio Turnover | 64.8% | 40% |
| YTM | - | - |
| Duration (Macaulay) | - | - |
Punji Fund Health Score
DSP Banking & Financial Services Fund and Invesco India Technology Fund carry the same Punji Quality grade.
Frequently asked questions
Which has a lower expense ratio, DSP Banking & Financial Services Fund or Invesco India Technology Fund?
DSP Banking & Financial Services Fund's direct-plan expense ratio is 0.21 percentage points lower than Invesco India Technology Fund's. Over long holding periods, a persistent expense-ratio gap compounds into a materially different final corpus even if the two funds' gross returns are similar - it's one of the few fund attributes you can compare with total certainty upfront, unlike future returns, since the fee is contractually fixed rather than a historical estimate.
Why don't DSP Banking & Financial Services Fund and Invesco India Technology Fund show risk metrics like Sharpe ratio or alpha?
This fund is less than three years old, so a three-year risk history does not exist yet. This is a deliberate methodology choice, not missing data - risk metrics like alpha and Sharpe ratio are most meaningful for actively-managed funds where a manager makes decisions that can add or subtract value versus a benchmark. For a fund that mechanically tracks an index, the equivalent useful metric is tracking error (how closely it follows its index), not alpha.
Which has higher AUM, DSP Banking & Financial Services Fund or Invesco India Technology Fund?
DSP Banking & Financial Services Fund has ₹2,014 Cr in assets under management, versus ₹341 Cr for Invesco India Technology Fund. A larger AUM generally means deeper liquidity and lower per-unit fixed costs for the AMC to spread across investors, but an AUM that's very large relative to a fund's category and strategy (especially in small/mid cap categories, where the investable universe is smaller) can also make it harder for a manager to enter and exit positions without moving the price - bigger isn't automatically better, especially for less liquid categories.
Which fund has a longer track record, DSP Banking & Financial Services Fund or Invesco India Technology Fund?
DSP Banking & Financial Services Fund launched on 2023-11-20, making it older than Invesco India Technology Fund (launched 2024-09-03). A longer track record means more real market cycles (bull runs, corrections, rate cycles) the fund has actually navigated, which is useful context for judging consistency - but it isn't a guarantee of future performance, and a newer fund isn't automatically worse, especially if it's run by an experienced manager or team with a track record at a prior fund.
Data as of 2026-10-29. Source: AMFI disclosures via Punji. Not investment advice.