PunjiPUNJI

COMPARE

DSP Aggressive Hybrid Fund - Direct Plan - Growth vs quant Aggressive Hybrid Fund-Growth Option-Direct Plan

DSP Aggressive Hybrid Fund and quant Aggressive Hybrid Fund- are both in the Aggressive Hybrid Fund category, from DSP Asset Managers Private Limited and quant Money Managers Limited respectively. quant Aggressive Hybrid Fund- has posted a higher 3-year rolling CAGR. DSP Aggressive Hybrid Fund has the lower expense ratio. See the full table and FAQ below for the complete real-data comparison.

Basics

DSP Aggressive Hybrid Fund has the lower direct-plan expense ratio, by 0.65 percentage points.

DSP Aggressive Hybrid Fund - Direct Plan - Growthquant Aggressive Hybrid Fund-Growth Option-Direct Plan
CategoryAggressive Hybrid FundAggressive Hybrid Fund
AMCDSP Asset Managers Private Limitedquant Money Managers Limited
BenchmarkCRISIL Hybrid 35+65 - Aggressive IndexNIFTY 50 Hybrid Composite Debt 65:35 Index TRI
NAV₹381.595 (2026-10-28)₹485.1929 (2026-10-28)
AUM₹11,224.476 Cr₹2,048.692 Cr
Expense Ratio (Direct)0.79%1.44%
Inception1999-05-032001-02-19

Returns

quant Aggressive Hybrid Fund- leads on 3-year rolling CAGR (16.2% vs DSP Aggressive Hybrid Fund's 14.6%) - see the FAQ below for percentile context within each fund's own category.

Risk Metrics

quant Aggressive Hybrid Fund- has been the more volatile of the two by standard deviation.

Portfolio Analytics

DSP Aggressive Hybrid Fund carries the higher portfolio YTM.

Punji Fund Health Score

quant Aggressive Hybrid Fund- has the stronger Punji Quality grade of the two.

Frequently asked questions

Which has a higher 3-year return, DSP Aggressive Hybrid Fund or quant Aggressive Hybrid Fund-?

quant Aggressive Hybrid Fund-'s 3-year rolling CAGR of 16.2% is higher than DSP Aggressive Hybrid Fund's 14.6%. quant Aggressive Hybrid Fund- sits in the 90th percentile of its category on this metric, versus the 55th percentile for DSP Aggressive Hybrid Fund - though note both funds may belong to different categories with different medians, so a raw CAGR comparison doesn't account for how each fund performed relative to its own peers. A higher historical return also doesn't necessarily mean lower risk; check the risk metrics below before concluding either fund is the "better" choice.

Which has a lower expense ratio, DSP Aggressive Hybrid Fund or quant Aggressive Hybrid Fund-?

DSP Aggressive Hybrid Fund's direct-plan expense ratio is 0.65 percentage points lower than quant Aggressive Hybrid Fund-'s. Over long holding periods, a persistent expense-ratio gap compounds into a materially different final corpus even if the two funds' gross returns are similar - it's one of the few fund attributes you can compare with total certainty upfront, unlike future returns, since the fee is contractually fixed rather than a historical estimate.

Which fund carries more risk, DSP Aggressive Hybrid Fund or quant Aggressive Hybrid Fund-?

By standard deviation (a measure of how much a fund's returns swing around its own average), quant Aggressive Hybrid Fund- has been more volatile than DSP Aggressive Hybrid Fund over the trailing window. Standard deviation captures total volatility in both directions - up and down - so a higher figure means bigger swings generally, not necessarily bigger losses specifically. Sharpe ratio (0.15 for DSP Aggressive Hybrid Fund vs 0.31 for quant Aggressive Hybrid Fund-) is a better single measure of risk-adjusted return, since it weighs the return earned per unit of volatility taken rather than volatility alone.

Which has higher AUM, DSP Aggressive Hybrid Fund or quant Aggressive Hybrid Fund-?

DSP Aggressive Hybrid Fund has ₹11,224 Cr in assets under management, versus ₹2,049 Cr for quant Aggressive Hybrid Fund-. A larger AUM generally means deeper liquidity and lower per-unit fixed costs for the AMC to spread across investors, but an AUM that's very large relative to a fund's category and strategy (especially in small/mid cap categories, where the investable universe is smaller) can also make it harder for a manager to enter and exit positions without moving the price - bigger isn't automatically better, especially for less liquid categories.

Which has a higher yield to maturity (YTM), DSP Aggressive Hybrid Fund or quant Aggressive Hybrid Fund-?

DSP Aggressive Hybrid Fund's portfolio YTM (7.9269%) is higher than quant Aggressive Hybrid Fund-'s. YTM is the weighted-average return a debt fund's current bond holdings would earn if held to maturity, assuming no defaults and coupons reinvested at the same rate - a useful forward-looking yield estimate for debt funds the way rolling CAGR is for equity funds, though it's an estimate based on today's portfolio, not a guaranteed return, and can move as bonds are bought/sold or as interest rates change.

Which fund has a longer track record, DSP Aggressive Hybrid Fund or quant Aggressive Hybrid Fund-?

DSP Aggressive Hybrid Fund launched on 1999-05-03, making it older than quant Aggressive Hybrid Fund- (launched 2001-02-19). A longer track record means more real market cycles (bull runs, corrections, rate cycles) the fund has actually navigated, which is useful context for judging consistency - but it isn't a guarantee of future performance, and a newer fund isn't automatically worse, especially if it's run by an experienced manager or team with a track record at a prior fund.

Data as of 2026-10-29. Source: AMFI disclosures via Punji. Not investment advice.