PunjiPUNJI

COMPARE

Capitalmind Multi Asset Allocation Fund-Direct-Growth vs quant Multi Asset Allocation Fund-GROWTH OPTION-Direct Plan

Capitalmind Multi Asset Allocation Fund-Direct-Growth and quant Multi Asset Allocation Fund- are both in the Multi Asset Allocation category, from Capitalmind Asset Management Private Limited and quant Money Managers Limited respectively. Capitalmind Multi Asset Allocation Fund-Direct-Growth has the lower expense ratio. See the full table and FAQ below for the complete real-data comparison.

Basics

Capitalmind Multi Asset Allocation Fund-Direct-Growth has the lower direct-plan expense ratio, by 0.20 percentage points.

Capitalmind Multi Asset Allocation Fund-Direct-Growthquant Multi Asset Allocation Fund-GROWTH OPTION-Direct Plan
CategoryMulti Asset AllocationMulti Asset Allocation
AMCCapitalmind Asset Management Private Limitedquant Money Managers Limited
Benchmark50% NIFTY 500 TRI + 25% NIFTY Composite Debt Index + 25% MCX iCOMDEX Composite Index65% Nifty 500 TRI + 15% CRISIL Short Term Bond Fund Index + 20% iCOMDEX Composite Index
NAV₹9.5558 (2026-10-28)₹175.9917 (2026-10-28)
AUM₹36.7 Cr₹6,680.225 Cr
Expense Ratio (Direct)0.98%1.18%
Inception2026-02-232001-02-19

Returns

This fund is less than a year old, so there is not yet enough history to calculate rolling returns.

Risk Metrics

This fund is less than three years old, so a three-year risk history does not exist yet.

Portfolio Analytics

quant Multi Asset Allocation Fund- carries the higher portfolio YTM.

Punji Fund Health Score

Capitalmind Multi Asset Allocation Fund-Direct-Growth has the stronger Punji Quality grade of the two.

Frequently asked questions

Which has a lower expense ratio, Capitalmind Multi Asset Allocation Fund-Direct-Growth or quant Multi Asset Allocation Fund-?

Capitalmind Multi Asset Allocation Fund-Direct-Growth's direct-plan expense ratio is 0.20 percentage points lower than quant Multi Asset Allocation Fund-'s. Over long holding periods, a persistent expense-ratio gap compounds into a materially different final corpus even if the two funds' gross returns are similar - it's one of the few fund attributes you can compare with total certainty upfront, unlike future returns, since the fee is contractually fixed rather than a historical estimate.

Why don't Capitalmind Multi Asset Allocation Fund-Direct-Growth and quant Multi Asset Allocation Fund- show risk metrics like Sharpe ratio or alpha?

This fund is less than three years old, so a three-year risk history does not exist yet. This is a deliberate methodology choice, not missing data - risk metrics like alpha and Sharpe ratio are most meaningful for actively-managed funds where a manager makes decisions that can add or subtract value versus a benchmark. For a fund that mechanically tracks an index, the equivalent useful metric is tracking error (how closely it follows its index), not alpha.

Which has higher AUM, Capitalmind Multi Asset Allocation Fund-Direct-Growth or quant Multi Asset Allocation Fund-?

quant Multi Asset Allocation Fund- has ₹6,680 Cr in assets under management, versus ₹37 Cr for Capitalmind Multi Asset Allocation Fund-Direct-Growth. A larger AUM generally means deeper liquidity and lower per-unit fixed costs for the AMC to spread across investors, but an AUM that's very large relative to a fund's category and strategy (especially in small/mid cap categories, where the investable universe is smaller) can also make it harder for a manager to enter and exit positions without moving the price - bigger isn't automatically better, especially for less liquid categories.

Which has a higher yield to maturity (YTM), Capitalmind Multi Asset Allocation Fund-Direct-Growth or quant Multi Asset Allocation Fund-?

quant Multi Asset Allocation Fund-'s portfolio YTM (6.6613%) is higher than Capitalmind Multi Asset Allocation Fund-Direct-Growth's. YTM is the weighted-average return a debt fund's current bond holdings would earn if held to maturity, assuming no defaults and coupons reinvested at the same rate - a useful forward-looking yield estimate for debt funds the way rolling CAGR is for equity funds, though it's an estimate based on today's portfolio, not a guaranteed return, and can move as bonds are bought/sold or as interest rates change.

Which has longer duration (more interest-rate sensitivity), Capitalmind Multi Asset Allocation Fund-Direct-Growth or quant Multi Asset Allocation Fund-?

Capitalmind Multi Asset Allocation Fund-Direct-Growth has the longer Macaulay duration of the two, meaning its NAV is more sensitive to interest-rate changes - a longer-duration debt fund tends to gain more when rates fall and lose more when rates rise, compared to a shorter-duration fund. Duration is expressed in years but isn't literally about how long you hold the fund; it's a measure of price sensitivity to rate moves. If you expect rates to fall, the longer-duration fund benefits more; if you expect rates to rise or want to minimize that swing, the shorter-duration fund is the more conservative pick.

Which fund has a longer track record, Capitalmind Multi Asset Allocation Fund-Direct-Growth or quant Multi Asset Allocation Fund-?

quant Multi Asset Allocation Fund- launched on 2001-02-19, making it older than Capitalmind Multi Asset Allocation Fund-Direct-Growth (launched 2026-02-23). A longer track record means more real market cycles (bull runs, corrections, rate cycles) the fund has actually navigated, which is useful context for judging consistency - but it isn't a guarantee of future performance, and a newer fund isn't automatically worse, especially if it's run by an experienced manager or team with a track record at a prior fund.

Data as of 2026-10-29. Source: AMFI disclosures via Punji. Not investment advice.