COMPARE
Capitalmind Flexi Cap Fund Direct Growth vs ITI Flexi Cap Fund- Direct Plan- Growth
Capitalmind Flexi Cap Fund Direct Growth and ITI Flexi Cap Fund- are both in the Flexi Cap Fund category, from Capitalmind Asset Management Private Limited and ITI Asset Management Limited respectively. ITI Flexi Cap Fund- has the lower expense ratio. See the full table and FAQ below for the complete real-data comparison.
Basics
ITI Flexi Cap Fund- has the lower direct-plan expense ratio, by 0.81 percentage points.
| Capitalmind Flexi Cap Fund Direct Growth | ITI Flexi Cap Fund- Direct Plan- Growth | |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Flexi Cap Fund | Flexi Cap Fund |
| AMC | Capitalmind Asset Management Private Limited | ITI Asset Management Limited |
| Benchmark | Nifty 500 TRI | Nifty 500 TRI |
| NAV | ₹9.9798 (2026-10-28) | ₹20.2347 (2026-10-28) |
| AUM | ₹452.46 Cr | ₹1,581.63 Cr |
| Expense Ratio (Direct) | 1.72% | 0.91% |
| Inception | 2025-07-18 | 2023-01-27 |
Returns
Risk Metrics
This fund is less than three years old, so a three-year risk history does not exist yet.
| Capitalmind Flexi Cap Fund Direct Growth | ITI Flexi Cap Fund- Direct Plan- Growth | |
|---|---|---|
| 3Y Sharpe Ratio | N/A | 0.56 |
| 3Y Alpha | N/A | 7.6964% |
| 3Y Std Deviation | N/A | 16.095% |
| 3Y Calmar Ratio | N/A | 0.75 |
Portfolio Analytics
Capitalmind Flexi Cap Fund Direct Growth carries the higher portfolio P/E ratio (a rougher proxy for how richly the underlying holdings are valued) - see the table below for the full comparison.
| Capitalmind Flexi Cap Fund Direct Growth | ITI Flexi Cap Fund- Direct Plan- Growth | |
|---|---|---|
| P/E Ratio | 30.6717 | 29.3338 |
| P/B Ratio | - | 5.8734 |
| Dividend Yield | 0.5044% | 0.7468% |
| Active Share | 91.98% | 58.55% |
| Portfolio Turnover | 14.000000000000002% | 33% |
| YTM | 5.5% | - |
| Duration (Macaulay) | - | - |
Punji Fund Health Score
Capitalmind Flexi Cap Fund Direct Growth has the stronger Punji Quality grade of the two.
Frequently asked questions
Which has a lower expense ratio, Capitalmind Flexi Cap Fund Direct Growth or ITI Flexi Cap Fund-?
ITI Flexi Cap Fund-'s direct-plan expense ratio is 0.81 percentage points lower than Capitalmind Flexi Cap Fund Direct Growth's. Over long holding periods, a persistent expense-ratio gap compounds into a materially different final corpus even if the two funds' gross returns are similar - it's one of the few fund attributes you can compare with total certainty upfront, unlike future returns, since the fee is contractually fixed rather than a historical estimate.
Why don't Capitalmind Flexi Cap Fund Direct Growth and ITI Flexi Cap Fund- show risk metrics like Sharpe ratio or alpha?
This fund is less than three years old, so a three-year risk history does not exist yet. This is a deliberate methodology choice, not missing data - risk metrics like alpha and Sharpe ratio are most meaningful for actively-managed funds where a manager makes decisions that can add or subtract value versus a benchmark. For a fund that mechanically tracks an index, the equivalent useful metric is tracking error (how closely it follows its index), not alpha.
Which has higher AUM, Capitalmind Flexi Cap Fund Direct Growth or ITI Flexi Cap Fund-?
ITI Flexi Cap Fund- has ₹1,582 Cr in assets under management, versus ₹452 Cr for Capitalmind Flexi Cap Fund Direct Growth. A larger AUM generally means deeper liquidity and lower per-unit fixed costs for the AMC to spread across investors, but an AUM that's very large relative to a fund's category and strategy (especially in small/mid cap categories, where the investable universe is smaller) can also make it harder for a manager to enter and exit positions without moving the price - bigger isn't automatically better, especially for less liquid categories.
Which fund has a longer track record, Capitalmind Flexi Cap Fund Direct Growth or ITI Flexi Cap Fund-?
ITI Flexi Cap Fund- launched on 2023-01-27, making it older than Capitalmind Flexi Cap Fund Direct Growth (launched 2025-07-18). A longer track record means more real market cycles (bull runs, corrections, rate cycles) the fund has actually navigated, which is useful context for judging consistency - but it isn't a guarantee of future performance, and a newer fund isn't automatically worse, especially if it's run by an experienced manager or team with a track record at a prior fund.
Data as of 2026-10-29. Source: AMFI disclosures via Punji. Not investment advice.