COMPARE
Canara Robeco Infrastructure Fund - Direct Plan - Growth Option vs Tata Digital India Fund-Direct Plan-Growth
Canara Robeco Infrastructure Fund and Tata Digital India Fund- are in different categories (Thematic Fund vs Sectoral/ Thematic), from Canara Robeco Asset Management Company Limited and Tata Asset Management Limited respectively. Canara Robeco Infrastructure Fund has posted a higher 3-year rolling CAGR. Tata Digital India Fund- has the lower expense ratio. See the full table and FAQ below for the complete real-data comparison.
Basics
Tata Digital India Fund- has the lower direct-plan expense ratio, by 0.44 percentage points.
| Canara Robeco Infrastructure Fund - Direct Plan - Growth Option | Tata Digital India Fund-Direct Plan-Growth | |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Thematic Fund | Sectoral/ Thematic |
| AMC | Canara Robeco Asset Management Company Limited | Tata Asset Management Limited |
| Benchmark | BSE India Infrastructure Index TRI | Nifty IT TRI |
| NAV | ₹182.46 (2026-09-30) | ₹45.5691 (2026-09-30) |
| AUM | ₹935.799 Cr | ₹9,489.69 Cr |
| Expense Ratio (Direct) | 1.11% | 0.67% |
| Inception | 2005-10-11 | 2015-12-04 |
Returns
Canara Robeco Infrastructure Fund leads on 3-year rolling CAGR (21.2% vs Tata Digital India Fund-'s 20.7%) - see the FAQ below for percentile context within each fund's own category.
Risk Metrics
Tata Digital India Fund- has been the more volatile of the two by standard deviation.
| Canara Robeco Infrastructure Fund - Direct Plan - Growth Option | Tata Digital India Fund-Direct Plan-Growth | |
|---|---|---|
| 3Y Sharpe Ratio | 0.65 | -0.21 |
| 3Y Alpha | 5.4467% | 3.5129% |
| 3Y Std Deviation | 18.1949% | 18.686% |
| 3Y Calmar Ratio | 0.80 | 0.09 |
Portfolio Analytics
Tata Digital India Fund- carries the higher portfolio P/E ratio (a rougher proxy for how richly the underlying holdings are valued) - see the table below for the full comparison.
| Canara Robeco Infrastructure Fund - Direct Plan - Growth Option | Tata Digital India Fund-Direct Plan-Growth | |
|---|---|---|
| P/E Ratio | 25.1479 | 27.1702 |
| P/B Ratio | 10.2099 | 9.717 |
| Dividend Yield | 1.1548% | 1.7807% |
| Active Share | 74.54% | - |
| Portfolio Turnover | 28.999999999999996% | - |
| YTM | - | - |
| Duration (Macaulay) | - | - |
Punji Fund Health Score
Tata Digital India Fund- has the stronger Punji Quality grade of the two.
| Canara Robeco Infrastructure Fund - Direct Plan - Growth Option | Tata Digital India Fund-Direct Plan-Growth | |
|---|---|---|
| Quality Grade | B | A |
| Safety Grade | B | D |
| Compound Grade | C | B |
Frequently asked questions
Which has a higher 3-year return, Canara Robeco Infrastructure Fund or Tata Digital India Fund-?
Canara Robeco Infrastructure Fund's 3-year rolling CAGR of 21.2% is higher than Tata Digital India Fund-'s 20.7%. Canara Robeco Infrastructure Fund sits in the 76th percentile of its category on this metric, versus the 79th percentile for Tata Digital India Fund- - though note both funds may belong to different categories with different medians, so a raw CAGR comparison doesn't account for how each fund performed relative to its own peers. A higher historical return also doesn't necessarily mean lower risk; check the risk metrics below before concluding either fund is the "better" choice.
Which has a lower expense ratio, Canara Robeco Infrastructure Fund or Tata Digital India Fund-?
Tata Digital India Fund-'s direct-plan expense ratio is 0.44 percentage points lower than Canara Robeco Infrastructure Fund's. Over long holding periods, a persistent expense-ratio gap compounds into a materially different final corpus even if the two funds' gross returns are similar - it's one of the few fund attributes you can compare with total certainty upfront, unlike future returns, since the fee is contractually fixed rather than a historical estimate.
Which fund carries more risk, Canara Robeco Infrastructure Fund or Tata Digital India Fund-?
By standard deviation (a measure of how much a fund's returns swing around its own average), Tata Digital India Fund- has been more volatile than Canara Robeco Infrastructure Fund over the trailing window. Standard deviation captures total volatility in both directions - up and down - so a higher figure means bigger swings generally, not necessarily bigger losses specifically. Sharpe ratio (0.65 for Canara Robeco Infrastructure Fund vs -0.21 for Tata Digital India Fund-) is a better single measure of risk-adjusted return, since it weighs the return earned per unit of volatility taken rather than volatility alone.
Which has higher AUM, Canara Robeco Infrastructure Fund or Tata Digital India Fund-?
Tata Digital India Fund- has ₹9,490 Cr in assets under management, versus ₹936 Cr for Canara Robeco Infrastructure Fund. A larger AUM generally means deeper liquidity and lower per-unit fixed costs for the AMC to spread across investors, but an AUM that's very large relative to a fund's category and strategy (especially in small/mid cap categories, where the investable universe is smaller) can also make it harder for a manager to enter and exit positions without moving the price - bigger isn't automatically better, especially for less liquid categories.
Which fund has a longer track record, Canara Robeco Infrastructure Fund or Tata Digital India Fund-?
Canara Robeco Infrastructure Fund launched on 2005-10-11, making it older than Tata Digital India Fund- (launched 2015-12-04). A longer track record means more real market cycles (bull runs, corrections, rate cycles) the fund has actually navigated, which is useful context for judging consistency - but it isn't a guarantee of future performance, and a newer fund isn't automatically worse, especially if it's run by an experienced manager or team with a track record at a prior fund.
Data as of 2026-10-01. Source: AMFI disclosures via Punji. Not investment advice.