PunjiPUNJI

COMPARE

Baroda BNP Paribas MULTI CAP FUND - Direct Plan - Growth Option vs WhiteOak Capital Multi Cap Fund Direct Plan Growth

Baroda BNP Paribas MULTI CAP FUND and WhiteOak Capital Multi Cap Fund are both in the Multi Cap Fund category, from Baroda BNP Paribas Asset Management India Private Limited and WhiteOak Capital Asset Management Limited respectively. WhiteOak Capital Multi Cap Fund has posted a higher 3-year rolling CAGR. Baroda BNP Paribas MULTI CAP FUND has the lower expense ratio. See the full table and FAQ below for the complete real-data comparison.

Basics

Baroda BNP Paribas MULTI CAP FUND has the lower direct-plan expense ratio, by 0.02 percentage points.

Baroda BNP Paribas MULTI CAP FUND - Direct Plan - Growth OptionWhiteOak Capital Multi Cap Fund Direct Plan Growth
CategoryMulti Cap FundMulti Cap Fund
AMCBaroda BNP Paribas Asset Management India Private LimitedWhiteOak Capital Asset Management Limited
BenchmarkNifty500 Multicap 50:25:25 TRINifty500 Multicap 50:25:25 TRI
NAV₹314.1794 (2026-10-28)₹16.064 (2026-10-28)
AUM₹3,213.3 Cr₹4,302.28 Cr
Expense Ratio (Direct)0.87%0.89%
Inception2003-08-142023-08-31

Returns

WhiteOak Capital Multi Cap Fund leads on 3-year rolling CAGR (17.3% vs Baroda BNP Paribas MULTI CAP FUND's 16.8%) - see the FAQ below for percentile context within each fund's own category.

Risk Metrics

Baroda BNP Paribas MULTI CAP FUND has been the more volatile of the two by standard deviation.

Portfolio Analytics

Baroda BNP Paribas MULTI CAP FUND carries the higher portfolio P/E ratio (a rougher proxy for how richly the underlying holdings are valued) - see the table below for the full comparison.

Punji Fund Health Score

WhiteOak Capital Multi Cap Fund has the stronger Punji Quality grade of the two.

Frequently asked questions

Which has a higher 3-year return, Baroda BNP Paribas MULTI CAP FUND or WhiteOak Capital Multi Cap Fund?

WhiteOak Capital Multi Cap Fund's 3-year rolling CAGR of 17.3% is higher than Baroda BNP Paribas MULTI CAP FUND's 16.8%. WhiteOak Capital Multi Cap Fund sits in the 27th percentile of its category on this metric, versus the 18th percentile for Baroda BNP Paribas MULTI CAP FUND - though note both funds may belong to different categories with different medians, so a raw CAGR comparison doesn't account for how each fund performed relative to its own peers. A higher historical return also doesn't necessarily mean lower risk; check the risk metrics below before concluding either fund is the "better" choice.

Which has a lower expense ratio, Baroda BNP Paribas MULTI CAP FUND or WhiteOak Capital Multi Cap Fund?

Baroda BNP Paribas MULTI CAP FUND's direct-plan expense ratio is 0.02 percentage points lower than WhiteOak Capital Multi Cap Fund's. Over long holding periods, a persistent expense-ratio gap compounds into a materially different final corpus even if the two funds' gross returns are similar - it's one of the few fund attributes you can compare with total certainty upfront, unlike future returns, since the fee is contractually fixed rather than a historical estimate.

Which fund carries more risk, Baroda BNP Paribas MULTI CAP FUND or WhiteOak Capital Multi Cap Fund?

By standard deviation (a measure of how much a fund's returns swing around its own average), Baroda BNP Paribas MULTI CAP FUND has been more volatile than WhiteOak Capital Multi Cap Fund over the trailing window. Standard deviation captures total volatility in both directions - up and down - so a higher figure means bigger swings generally, not necessarily bigger losses specifically. Sharpe ratio (0.26 for Baroda BNP Paribas MULTI CAP FUND vs 0.58 for WhiteOak Capital Multi Cap Fund) is a better single measure of risk-adjusted return, since it weighs the return earned per unit of volatility taken rather than volatility alone.

Which has higher AUM, Baroda BNP Paribas MULTI CAP FUND or WhiteOak Capital Multi Cap Fund?

WhiteOak Capital Multi Cap Fund has ₹4,302 Cr in assets under management, versus ₹3,213 Cr for Baroda BNP Paribas MULTI CAP FUND. A larger AUM generally means deeper liquidity and lower per-unit fixed costs for the AMC to spread across investors, but an AUM that's very large relative to a fund's category and strategy (especially in small/mid cap categories, where the investable universe is smaller) can also make it harder for a manager to enter and exit positions without moving the price - bigger isn't automatically better, especially for less liquid categories.

Which fund has a longer track record, Baroda BNP Paribas MULTI CAP FUND or WhiteOak Capital Multi Cap Fund?

Baroda BNP Paribas MULTI CAP FUND launched on 2003-08-14, making it older than WhiteOak Capital Multi Cap Fund (launched 2023-08-31). A longer track record means more real market cycles (bull runs, corrections, rate cycles) the fund has actually navigated, which is useful context for judging consistency - but it isn't a guarantee of future performance, and a newer fund isn't automatically worse, especially if it's run by an experienced manager or team with a track record at a prior fund.

Data as of 2026-10-29. Source: AMFI disclosures via Punji. Not investment advice.