COMPARE
Baroda BNP Paribas Large and Mid Cap Fund- Direct Plan -Growth Option vs quant Large & Mid Cap Fund - Growth Option-Direct Plan
Baroda BNP Paribas Large and Mid Cap Fund- and quant Large & Mid Cap Fund are both in the Large & Mid Cap Fund category, from Baroda BNP Paribas Asset Management India Private Limited and quant Money Managers Limited respectively. quant Large & Mid Cap Fund has posted a higher 3-year rolling CAGR. Baroda BNP Paribas Large and Mid Cap Fund- has the lower expense ratio. See the full table and FAQ below for the complete real-data comparison.
Basics
Baroda BNP Paribas Large and Mid Cap Fund- has the lower direct-plan expense ratio, by 0.40 percentage points.
| Baroda BNP Paribas Large and Mid Cap Fund- Direct Plan -Growth Option | quant Large & Mid Cap Fund - Growth Option-Direct Plan | |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Large & Mid Cap Fund | Large & Mid Cap Fund |
| AMC | Baroda BNP Paribas Asset Management India Private Limited | quant Money Managers Limited |
| Benchmark | BSE 250 LargeMidCap Index TRI | NIFTY LargeMidcap 250 TRI |
| NAV | ₹28.4005 (2026-10-28) | ₹131.6213 (2026-10-28) |
| AUM | ₹1,741.01 Cr | ₹3,297.195 Cr |
| Expense Ratio (Direct) | 0.83% | 1.23% |
| Inception | 2020-08-17 | 2006-11-20 |
Returns
quant Large & Mid Cap Fund leads on 3-year rolling CAGR (21.0% vs Baroda BNP Paribas Large and Mid Cap Fund-'s 20.3%) - see the FAQ below for percentile context within each fund's own category.
Risk Metrics
quant Large & Mid Cap Fund has been the more volatile of the two by standard deviation.
| Baroda BNP Paribas Large and Mid Cap Fund- Direct Plan -Growth Option | quant Large & Mid Cap Fund - Growth Option-Direct Plan | |
|---|---|---|
| 3Y Sharpe Ratio | 0.30 | 0.31 |
| 3Y Alpha | 3.9233% | 2.2569% |
| 3Y Std Deviation | 14.6946% | 16.0167% |
| 3Y Calmar Ratio | 0.59 | 0.50 |
Portfolio Analytics
Baroda BNP Paribas Large and Mid Cap Fund- carries the higher portfolio YTM.
| Baroda BNP Paribas Large and Mid Cap Fund- Direct Plan -Growth Option | quant Large & Mid Cap Fund - Growth Option-Direct Plan | |
|---|---|---|
| P/E Ratio | 29.2438 | 30.8438 |
| P/B Ratio | - | 4.4922 |
| Dividend Yield | 0.9448% | 0.3129% |
| Active Share | 65.24% | 95.91% |
| Portfolio Turnover | - | - |
| YTM | 5.8% | 5.3701% |
| Duration (Macaulay) | - | - |
Punji Fund Health Score
Baroda BNP Paribas Large and Mid Cap Fund- and quant Large & Mid Cap Fund carry the same Punji Quality grade.
Frequently asked questions
Which has a higher 3-year return, Baroda BNP Paribas Large and Mid Cap Fund- or quant Large & Mid Cap Fund?
quant Large & Mid Cap Fund's 3-year rolling CAGR of 21.0% is higher than Baroda BNP Paribas Large and Mid Cap Fund-'s 20.3%. quant Large & Mid Cap Fund sits in the 96th percentile of its category on this metric, versus the 81st percentile for Baroda BNP Paribas Large and Mid Cap Fund- - though note both funds may belong to different categories with different medians, so a raw CAGR comparison doesn't account for how each fund performed relative to its own peers. A higher historical return also doesn't necessarily mean lower risk; check the risk metrics below before concluding either fund is the "better" choice.
Which has a lower expense ratio, Baroda BNP Paribas Large and Mid Cap Fund- or quant Large & Mid Cap Fund?
Baroda BNP Paribas Large and Mid Cap Fund-'s direct-plan expense ratio is 0.40 percentage points lower than quant Large & Mid Cap Fund's. Over long holding periods, a persistent expense-ratio gap compounds into a materially different final corpus even if the two funds' gross returns are similar - it's one of the few fund attributes you can compare with total certainty upfront, unlike future returns, since the fee is contractually fixed rather than a historical estimate.
Which fund carries more risk, Baroda BNP Paribas Large and Mid Cap Fund- or quant Large & Mid Cap Fund?
By standard deviation (a measure of how much a fund's returns swing around its own average), quant Large & Mid Cap Fund has been more volatile than Baroda BNP Paribas Large and Mid Cap Fund- over the trailing window. Standard deviation captures total volatility in both directions - up and down - so a higher figure means bigger swings generally, not necessarily bigger losses specifically. Sharpe ratio (0.30 for Baroda BNP Paribas Large and Mid Cap Fund- vs 0.31 for quant Large & Mid Cap Fund) is a better single measure of risk-adjusted return, since it weighs the return earned per unit of volatility taken rather than volatility alone.
Which has higher AUM, Baroda BNP Paribas Large and Mid Cap Fund- or quant Large & Mid Cap Fund?
quant Large & Mid Cap Fund has ₹3,297 Cr in assets under management, versus ₹1,741 Cr for Baroda BNP Paribas Large and Mid Cap Fund-. A larger AUM generally means deeper liquidity and lower per-unit fixed costs for the AMC to spread across investors, but an AUM that's very large relative to a fund's category and strategy (especially in small/mid cap categories, where the investable universe is smaller) can also make it harder for a manager to enter and exit positions without moving the price - bigger isn't automatically better, especially for less liquid categories.
Which has a higher yield to maturity (YTM), Baroda BNP Paribas Large and Mid Cap Fund- or quant Large & Mid Cap Fund?
Baroda BNP Paribas Large and Mid Cap Fund-'s portfolio YTM (5.8%) is higher than quant Large & Mid Cap Fund's. YTM is the weighted-average return a debt fund's current bond holdings would earn if held to maturity, assuming no defaults and coupons reinvested at the same rate - a useful forward-looking yield estimate for debt funds the way rolling CAGR is for equity funds, though it's an estimate based on today's portfolio, not a guaranteed return, and can move as bonds are bought/sold or as interest rates change.
Which fund has a longer track record, Baroda BNP Paribas Large and Mid Cap Fund- or quant Large & Mid Cap Fund?
quant Large & Mid Cap Fund launched on 2006-11-20, making it older than Baroda BNP Paribas Large and Mid Cap Fund- (launched 2020-08-17). A longer track record means more real market cycles (bull runs, corrections, rate cycles) the fund has actually navigated, which is useful context for judging consistency - but it isn't a guarantee of future performance, and a newer fund isn't automatically worse, especially if it's run by an experienced manager or team with a track record at a prior fund.
Data as of 2026-10-29. Source: AMFI disclosures via Punji. Not investment advice.