PunjiPUNJI

COMPARE

Baroda BNP Paribas Large and Mid Cap Fund- Direct Plan -Growth Option vs HSBC Large & Mid Cap Fund - Direct Growth

Baroda BNP Paribas Large and Mid Cap Fund- and HSBC Large & Mid Cap Fund are both in the Large & Mid Cap Fund category, from Baroda BNP Paribas Asset Management India Private Limited and HSBC Asset Management (India) Private Ltd. respectively. HSBC Large & Mid Cap Fund has posted a higher 3-year rolling CAGR. Baroda BNP Paribas Large and Mid Cap Fund- has the lower expense ratio. See the full table and FAQ below for the complete real-data comparison.

Basics

Baroda BNP Paribas Large and Mid Cap Fund- has the lower direct-plan expense ratio, by 0.56 percentage points.

Baroda BNP Paribas Large and Mid Cap Fund- Direct Plan -Growth OptionHSBC Large & Mid Cap Fund - Direct Growth
CategoryLarge & Mid Cap FundLarge & Mid Cap Fund
AMCBaroda BNP Paribas Asset Management India Private LimitedHSBC Asset Management (India) Private Ltd.
BenchmarkBSE 250 LargeMidCap Index TRINIFTY LargeMidcap 250 TRI
NAV₹28.4005 (2026-10-28)₹31.3878 (2026-10-28)
AUM₹1,741.01 Cr₹5,679.217 Cr
Expense Ratio (Direct)0.83%1.39%
Inception2020-08-172019-03-11

Returns

HSBC Large & Mid Cap Fund leads on 3-year rolling CAGR (21.0% vs Baroda BNP Paribas Large and Mid Cap Fund-'s 20.3%) - see the FAQ below for percentile context within each fund's own category.

Risk Metrics

HSBC Large & Mid Cap Fund has been the more volatile of the two by standard deviation.

Portfolio Analytics

HSBC Large & Mid Cap Fund carries the higher portfolio P/E ratio (a rougher proxy for how richly the underlying holdings are valued) - see the table below for the full comparison.

Punji Fund Health Score

Baroda BNP Paribas Large and Mid Cap Fund- and HSBC Large & Mid Cap Fund carry the same Punji Quality grade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has a higher 3-year return, Baroda BNP Paribas Large and Mid Cap Fund- or HSBC Large & Mid Cap Fund?

HSBC Large & Mid Cap Fund's 3-year rolling CAGR of 21.0% is higher than Baroda BNP Paribas Large and Mid Cap Fund-'s 20.3%. HSBC Large & Mid Cap Fund sits in the 92nd percentile of its category on this metric, versus the 81st percentile for Baroda BNP Paribas Large and Mid Cap Fund- - though note both funds may belong to different categories with different medians, so a raw CAGR comparison doesn't account for how each fund performed relative to its own peers. A higher historical return also doesn't necessarily mean lower risk; check the risk metrics below before concluding either fund is the "better" choice.

Which has a lower expense ratio, Baroda BNP Paribas Large and Mid Cap Fund- or HSBC Large & Mid Cap Fund?

Baroda BNP Paribas Large and Mid Cap Fund-'s direct-plan expense ratio is 0.56 percentage points lower than HSBC Large & Mid Cap Fund's. Over long holding periods, a persistent expense-ratio gap compounds into a materially different final corpus even if the two funds' gross returns are similar - it's one of the few fund attributes you can compare with total certainty upfront, unlike future returns, since the fee is contractually fixed rather than a historical estimate.

Which fund carries more risk, Baroda BNP Paribas Large and Mid Cap Fund- or HSBC Large & Mid Cap Fund?

By standard deviation (a measure of how much a fund's returns swing around its own average), HSBC Large & Mid Cap Fund has been more volatile than Baroda BNP Paribas Large and Mid Cap Fund- over the trailing window. Standard deviation captures total volatility in both directions - up and down - so a higher figure means bigger swings generally, not necessarily bigger losses specifically. Sharpe ratio (0.30 for Baroda BNP Paribas Large and Mid Cap Fund- vs 0.39 for HSBC Large & Mid Cap Fund) is a better single measure of risk-adjusted return, since it weighs the return earned per unit of volatility taken rather than volatility alone.

Which has higher AUM, Baroda BNP Paribas Large and Mid Cap Fund- or HSBC Large & Mid Cap Fund?

HSBC Large & Mid Cap Fund has ₹5,679 Cr in assets under management, versus ₹1,741 Cr for Baroda BNP Paribas Large and Mid Cap Fund-. A larger AUM generally means deeper liquidity and lower per-unit fixed costs for the AMC to spread across investors, but an AUM that's very large relative to a fund's category and strategy (especially in small/mid cap categories, where the investable universe is smaller) can also make it harder for a manager to enter and exit positions without moving the price - bigger isn't automatically better, especially for less liquid categories.

Which fund has a longer track record, Baroda BNP Paribas Large and Mid Cap Fund- or HSBC Large & Mid Cap Fund?

HSBC Large & Mid Cap Fund launched on 2019-03-11, making it older than Baroda BNP Paribas Large and Mid Cap Fund- (launched 2020-08-17). A longer track record means more real market cycles (bull runs, corrections, rate cycles) the fund has actually navigated, which is useful context for judging consistency - but it isn't a guarantee of future performance, and a newer fund isn't automatically worse, especially if it's run by an experienced manager or team with a track record at a prior fund.

Data as of 2026-10-29. Source: AMFI disclosures via Punji. Not investment advice.