PunjiPUNJI

COMPARE

Baroda BNP Paribas Children's Fund - Direct Plan - Growth Option vs HDFC Childrens Fund - Direct Plan

Baroda BNP Paribas Children's Fund and HDFC Childrens Fund are both in the Children s Fund category, from Baroda BNP Paribas Asset Management India Private Limited and HDFC Asset Management Company Limited respectively. HDFC Childrens Fund has the lower expense ratio. See the full table and FAQ below for the complete real-data comparison.

Basics

HDFC Childrens Fund has the lower direct-plan expense ratio, by 0.05 percentage points.

Baroda BNP Paribas Children's Fund - Direct Plan - Growth OptionHDFC Childrens Fund - Direct Plan
CategoryChildren s FundChildren s Fund
AMCBaroda BNP Paribas Asset Management India Private LimitedHDFC Asset Management Company Limited
BenchmarkNifty 500 TRINIFTY 50 Hybrid Composite Debt 65:35 Index TRI
NAV₹10.858 (2026-10-28)₹310.806 (2026-10-28)
AUM₹122.08 Cr₹10,172.767 Cr
Expense Ratio (Direct)1.09%1.04%
Inception2024-12-062001-01-25

Returns

Risk Metrics

This fund is less than three years old, so a three-year risk history does not exist yet.

Portfolio Analytics

Baroda BNP Paribas Children's Fund carries the higher portfolio YTM.

Punji Fund Health Score

Baroda BNP Paribas Children's Fund has the stronger Punji Quality grade of the two.

Frequently asked questions

Which has a lower expense ratio, Baroda BNP Paribas Children's Fund or HDFC Childrens Fund?

HDFC Childrens Fund's direct-plan expense ratio is 0.05 percentage points lower than Baroda BNP Paribas Children's Fund's. Over long holding periods, a persistent expense-ratio gap compounds into a materially different final corpus even if the two funds' gross returns are similar - it's one of the few fund attributes you can compare with total certainty upfront, unlike future returns, since the fee is contractually fixed rather than a historical estimate.

Why don't Baroda BNP Paribas Children's Fund and HDFC Childrens Fund show risk metrics like Sharpe ratio or alpha?

This fund is less than three years old, so a three-year risk history does not exist yet. This is a deliberate methodology choice, not missing data - risk metrics like alpha and Sharpe ratio are most meaningful for actively-managed funds where a manager makes decisions that can add or subtract value versus a benchmark. For a fund that mechanically tracks an index, the equivalent useful metric is tracking error (how closely it follows its index), not alpha.

Which has higher AUM, Baroda BNP Paribas Children's Fund or HDFC Childrens Fund?

HDFC Childrens Fund has ₹10,173 Cr in assets under management, versus ₹122 Cr for Baroda BNP Paribas Children's Fund. A larger AUM generally means deeper liquidity and lower per-unit fixed costs for the AMC to spread across investors, but an AUM that's very large relative to a fund's category and strategy (especially in small/mid cap categories, where the investable universe is smaller) can also make it harder for a manager to enter and exit positions without moving the price - bigger isn't automatically better, especially for less liquid categories.

Which has a higher yield to maturity (YTM), Baroda BNP Paribas Children's Fund or HDFC Childrens Fund?

Baroda BNP Paribas Children's Fund's portfolio YTM (7.24%) is higher than HDFC Childrens Fund's. YTM is the weighted-average return a debt fund's current bond holdings would earn if held to maturity, assuming no defaults and coupons reinvested at the same rate - a useful forward-looking yield estimate for debt funds the way rolling CAGR is for equity funds, though it's an estimate based on today's portfolio, not a guaranteed return, and can move as bonds are bought/sold or as interest rates change.

Which fund has a longer track record, Baroda BNP Paribas Children's Fund or HDFC Childrens Fund?

HDFC Childrens Fund launched on 2001-01-25, making it older than Baroda BNP Paribas Children's Fund (launched 2024-12-06). A longer track record means more real market cycles (bull runs, corrections, rate cycles) the fund has actually navigated, which is useful context for judging consistency - but it isn't a guarantee of future performance, and a newer fund isn't automatically worse, especially if it's run by an experienced manager or team with a track record at a prior fund.

Data as of 2026-10-29. Source: AMFI disclosures via Punji. Not investment advice.