PunjiPUNJI

COMPARE

Baroda Bnp Paribas Arbitrage Fund-direct Plan-growth Option vs Capitalmind Arbitrage Fund-Direct-Growth

Baroda Bnp Paribas Arbitrage Fund- and Capitalmind Arbitrage Fund-Direct-Growth are both in the Arbitrage Fund category, from Baroda BNP Paribas Asset Management India Private Limited and Capitalmind Asset Management Private Limited respectively. Baroda Bnp Paribas Arbitrage Fund- has the lower expense ratio. See the full table and FAQ below for the complete real-data comparison.

Basics

Baroda Bnp Paribas Arbitrage Fund- has the lower direct-plan expense ratio, by 0.80 percentage points.

Baroda Bnp Paribas Arbitrage Fund-direct Plan-growth OptionCapitalmind Arbitrage Fund-Direct-Growth
CategoryArbitrage FundArbitrage Fund
AMCBaroda BNP Paribas Asset Management India Private LimitedCapitalmind Asset Management Private Limited
BenchmarkNifty 50 ArbitrageNifty 50 Arbitrage
NAV₹18.3848 (2026-10-28)₹10.3739 (2026-10-28)
AUM₹1,043.89 Cr₹22.33 Cr
Expense Ratio (Direct)0.35%1.15%
Inception2016-12-082026-02-23

Returns

Arbitrage funds target a small, steady spread, so a rolling return band would show a flat line rather than anything informative.

Risk Metrics

Arbitrage funds target a small, steady spread rather than market returns, so beta and alpha against an equity index describe nothing useful.

Portfolio Analytics

Baroda Bnp Paribas Arbitrage Fund- carries the higher portfolio YTM.

Punji Fund Health Score

Capitalmind Arbitrage Fund-Direct-Growth has the stronger Punji Quality grade of the two.

Frequently asked questions

Which has a lower expense ratio, Baroda Bnp Paribas Arbitrage Fund- or Capitalmind Arbitrage Fund-Direct-Growth?

Baroda Bnp Paribas Arbitrage Fund-'s direct-plan expense ratio is 0.80 percentage points lower than Capitalmind Arbitrage Fund-Direct-Growth's. Over long holding periods, a persistent expense-ratio gap compounds into a materially different final corpus even if the two funds' gross returns are similar - it's one of the few fund attributes you can compare with total certainty upfront, unlike future returns, since the fee is contractually fixed rather than a historical estimate.

Why don't Baroda Bnp Paribas Arbitrage Fund- and Capitalmind Arbitrage Fund-Direct-Growth show risk metrics like Sharpe ratio or alpha?

Arbitrage funds target a small, steady spread rather than market returns, so beta and alpha against an equity index describe nothing useful. This is a deliberate methodology choice, not missing data - risk metrics like alpha and Sharpe ratio are most meaningful for actively-managed funds where a manager makes decisions that can add or subtract value versus a benchmark. For a fund that mechanically tracks an index, the equivalent useful metric is tracking error (how closely it follows its index), not alpha.

Which has higher AUM, Baroda Bnp Paribas Arbitrage Fund- or Capitalmind Arbitrage Fund-Direct-Growth?

Baroda Bnp Paribas Arbitrage Fund- has ₹1,044 Cr in assets under management, versus ₹22 Cr for Capitalmind Arbitrage Fund-Direct-Growth. A larger AUM generally means deeper liquidity and lower per-unit fixed costs for the AMC to spread across investors, but an AUM that's very large relative to a fund's category and strategy (especially in small/mid cap categories, where the investable universe is smaller) can also make it harder for a manager to enter and exit positions without moving the price - bigger isn't automatically better, especially for less liquid categories.

Which has a higher yield to maturity (YTM), Baroda Bnp Paribas Arbitrage Fund- or Capitalmind Arbitrage Fund-Direct-Growth?

Baroda Bnp Paribas Arbitrage Fund-'s portfolio YTM (5.624%) is higher than Capitalmind Arbitrage Fund-Direct-Growth's. YTM is the weighted-average return a debt fund's current bond holdings would earn if held to maturity, assuming no defaults and coupons reinvested at the same rate - a useful forward-looking yield estimate for debt funds the way rolling CAGR is for equity funds, though it's an estimate based on today's portfolio, not a guaranteed return, and can move as bonds are bought/sold or as interest rates change.

Which fund has a longer track record, Baroda Bnp Paribas Arbitrage Fund- or Capitalmind Arbitrage Fund-Direct-Growth?

Baroda Bnp Paribas Arbitrage Fund- launched on 2016-12-08, making it older than Capitalmind Arbitrage Fund-Direct-Growth (launched 2026-02-23). A longer track record means more real market cycles (bull runs, corrections, rate cycles) the fund has actually navigated, which is useful context for judging consistency - but it isn't a guarantee of future performance, and a newer fund isn't automatically worse, especially if it's run by an experienced manager or team with a track record at a prior fund.

Data as of 2026-10-29. Source: AMFI disclosures via Punji. Not investment advice.