COMPARE
Bandhan Value Fund - Direct Plan - Growth vs DSP Value Fund - Direct Plan - Growth
Bandhan Value Fund and DSP Value Fund are both in the Value Fund category, from Bandhan AMC Limited and DSP Asset Managers Private Limited respectively. Bandhan Value Fund has posted a higher 3-year rolling CAGR. Bandhan Value Fund has the lower expense ratio. See the full table and FAQ below for the complete real-data comparison.
Basics
Bandhan Value Fund has the lower direct-plan expense ratio, by 0.57 percentage points.
| Bandhan Value Fund - Direct Plan - Growth | DSP Value Fund - Direct Plan - Growth | |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Value Fund | Value Fund |
| AMC | Bandhan AMC Limited | DSP Asset Managers Private Limited |
| Benchmark | BSE 500 TRI | Nifty 500 TRI |
| NAV | ₹160.758 (2026-10-28) | ₹23.636 (2026-10-28) |
| AUM | ₹9,461.045 Cr | ₹2,287.671 Cr |
| Expense Ratio (Direct) | 0.98% | 1.55% |
| Inception | 2008-01-09 | 2020-11-20 |
Returns
Bandhan Value Fund leads on 3-year rolling CAGR (18.8% vs DSP Value Fund's 18.6%) - see the FAQ below for percentile context within each fund's own category.
Risk Metrics
Bandhan Value Fund has been the more volatile of the two by standard deviation.
| Bandhan Value Fund - Direct Plan - Growth | DSP Value Fund - Direct Plan - Growth | |
|---|---|---|
| 3Y Sharpe Ratio | 0.14 | 0.71 |
| 3Y Alpha | 1.0382% | 6.968% |
| 3Y Std Deviation | 13.0322% | 10.9079% |
| 3Y Calmar Ratio | 0.50 | 1.08 |
Portfolio Analytics
Bandhan Value Fund carries the higher portfolio P/E ratio (a rougher proxy for how richly the underlying holdings are valued) - see the table below for the full comparison.
| Bandhan Value Fund - Direct Plan - Growth | DSP Value Fund - Direct Plan - Growth | |
|---|---|---|
| P/E Ratio | 21.7646 | 20.1495 |
| P/B Ratio | - | - |
| Dividend Yield | 1.4188% | 1.8723% |
| Active Share | 64.3% | 65.65% |
| Portfolio Turnover | 67% | 136% |
| YTM | 5.75% | - |
| Duration (Macaulay) | - | - |
Punji Fund Health Score
Bandhan Value Fund and DSP Value Fund carry the same Punji Quality grade.
Frequently asked questions
Which has a higher 3-year return, Bandhan Value Fund or DSP Value Fund?
Bandhan Value Fund's 3-year rolling CAGR of 18.8% is higher than DSP Value Fund's 18.6%. Bandhan Value Fund sits in the 57th percentile of its category on this metric, versus the 48th percentile for DSP Value Fund - though note both funds may belong to different categories with different medians, so a raw CAGR comparison doesn't account for how each fund performed relative to its own peers. A higher historical return also doesn't necessarily mean lower risk; check the risk metrics below before concluding either fund is the "better" choice.
Which has a lower expense ratio, Bandhan Value Fund or DSP Value Fund?
Bandhan Value Fund's direct-plan expense ratio is 0.57 percentage points lower than DSP Value Fund's. Over long holding periods, a persistent expense-ratio gap compounds into a materially different final corpus even if the two funds' gross returns are similar - it's one of the few fund attributes you can compare with total certainty upfront, unlike future returns, since the fee is contractually fixed rather than a historical estimate.
Which fund carries more risk, Bandhan Value Fund or DSP Value Fund?
By standard deviation (a measure of how much a fund's returns swing around its own average), Bandhan Value Fund has been more volatile than DSP Value Fund over the trailing window. Standard deviation captures total volatility in both directions - up and down - so a higher figure means bigger swings generally, not necessarily bigger losses specifically. Sharpe ratio (0.14 for Bandhan Value Fund vs 0.71 for DSP Value Fund) is a better single measure of risk-adjusted return, since it weighs the return earned per unit of volatility taken rather than volatility alone.
Which has higher AUM, Bandhan Value Fund or DSP Value Fund?
Bandhan Value Fund has ₹9,461 Cr in assets under management, versus ₹2,288 Cr for DSP Value Fund. A larger AUM generally means deeper liquidity and lower per-unit fixed costs for the AMC to spread across investors, but an AUM that's very large relative to a fund's category and strategy (especially in small/mid cap categories, where the investable universe is smaller) can also make it harder for a manager to enter and exit positions without moving the price - bigger isn't automatically better, especially for less liquid categories.
Which fund has a longer track record, Bandhan Value Fund or DSP Value Fund?
Bandhan Value Fund launched on 2008-01-09, making it older than DSP Value Fund (launched 2020-11-20). A longer track record means more real market cycles (bull runs, corrections, rate cycles) the fund has actually navigated, which is useful context for judging consistency - but it isn't a guarantee of future performance, and a newer fund isn't automatically worse, especially if it's run by an experienced manager or team with a track record at a prior fund.
Data as of 2026-10-29. Source: AMFI disclosures via Punji. Not investment advice.