COMPARE
Bandhan Transportation And Logistics Fund - Growth - Direct Plan vs Nippon India Power & Infra Fund - Direct Plan Growth Plan - Growth Option
Bandhan Transportation And Logistics Fund and Nippon India Power & Infra Fund are both in the Sectoral Fund category, from Bandhan AMC Limited and Nippon Life India Asset Management Limited respectively. Bandhan Transportation And Logistics Fund has posted a higher 3-year rolling CAGR. Bandhan Transportation And Logistics Fund has the lower expense ratio. See the full table and FAQ below for the complete real-data comparison.
Basics
Bandhan Transportation And Logistics Fund has the lower direct-plan expense ratio, by 0.02 percentage points.
| Bandhan Transportation And Logistics Fund - Growth - Direct Plan | Nippon India Power & Infra Fund - Direct Plan Growth Plan - Growth Option | |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Sectoral Fund | Sectoral Fund |
| AMC | Bandhan AMC Limited | Nippon Life India Asset Management Limited |
| Benchmark | Nifty Transportation & Logistics TRI | Nifty Infrastructure TRI |
| NAV | ₹20.127 (2026-10-28) | ₹382.3478 (2026-10-28) |
| AUM | ₹691.542 Cr | ₹7,467.512 Cr |
| Expense Ratio (Direct) | 1.08% | 1.1% |
| Inception | 2022-10-04 | 2004-03-29 |
Returns
Bandhan Transportation And Logistics Fund leads on 3-year rolling CAGR (24.7% vs Nippon India Power & Infra Fund's 18.0%) - see the FAQ below for percentile context within each fund's own category.
Risk Metrics
Nippon India Power & Infra Fund has been the more volatile of the two by standard deviation.
Portfolio Analytics
Bandhan Transportation And Logistics Fund carries the higher portfolio P/E ratio (a rougher proxy for how richly the underlying holdings are valued) - see the table below for the full comparison.
Punji Fund Health Score
Bandhan Transportation And Logistics Fund has the stronger Punji Quality grade of the two.
Frequently asked questions
Which has a higher 3-year return, Bandhan Transportation And Logistics Fund or Nippon India Power & Infra Fund?
Bandhan Transportation And Logistics Fund's 3-year rolling CAGR of 24.7% is higher than Nippon India Power & Infra Fund's 18.0%. Bandhan Transportation And Logistics Fund sits in the 100th percentile of its category on this metric, versus the 33rd percentile for Nippon India Power & Infra Fund - though note both funds may belong to different categories with different medians, so a raw CAGR comparison doesn't account for how each fund performed relative to its own peers. A higher historical return also doesn't necessarily mean lower risk; check the risk metrics below before concluding either fund is the "better" choice.
Which has a lower expense ratio, Bandhan Transportation And Logistics Fund or Nippon India Power & Infra Fund?
Bandhan Transportation And Logistics Fund's direct-plan expense ratio is 0.02 percentage points lower than Nippon India Power & Infra Fund's. Over long holding periods, a persistent expense-ratio gap compounds into a materially different final corpus even if the two funds' gross returns are similar - it's one of the few fund attributes you can compare with total certainty upfront, unlike future returns, since the fee is contractually fixed rather than a historical estimate.
Which fund carries more risk, Bandhan Transportation And Logistics Fund or Nippon India Power & Infra Fund?
By standard deviation (a measure of how much a fund's returns swing around its own average), Nippon India Power & Infra Fund has been more volatile than Bandhan Transportation And Logistics Fund over the trailing window. Standard deviation captures total volatility in both directions - up and down - so a higher figure means bigger swings generally, not necessarily bigger losses specifically. Sharpe ratio (0.47 for Bandhan Transportation And Logistics Fund vs 0.36 for Nippon India Power & Infra Fund) is a better single measure of risk-adjusted return, since it weighs the return earned per unit of volatility taken rather than volatility alone.
Which has higher AUM, Bandhan Transportation And Logistics Fund or Nippon India Power & Infra Fund?
Nippon India Power & Infra Fund has ₹7,468 Cr in assets under management, versus ₹692 Cr for Bandhan Transportation And Logistics Fund. A larger AUM generally means deeper liquidity and lower per-unit fixed costs for the AMC to spread across investors, but an AUM that's very large relative to a fund's category and strategy (especially in small/mid cap categories, where the investable universe is smaller) can also make it harder for a manager to enter and exit positions without moving the price - bigger isn't automatically better, especially for less liquid categories.
Which fund has a longer track record, Bandhan Transportation And Logistics Fund or Nippon India Power & Infra Fund?
Nippon India Power & Infra Fund launched on 2004-03-29, making it older than Bandhan Transportation And Logistics Fund (launched 2022-10-04). A longer track record means more real market cycles (bull runs, corrections, rate cycles) the fund has actually navigated, which is useful context for judging consistency - but it isn't a guarantee of future performance, and a newer fund isn't automatically worse, especially if it's run by an experienced manager or team with a track record at a prior fund.
Data as of 2026-10-29. Source: AMFI disclosures via Punji. Not investment advice.