COMPARE
Bandhan Large & Mid Cap Fund - Direct Plan - Growth vs Baroda BNP Paribas Large and Mid Cap Fund- Direct Plan -Growth Option
Bandhan Large & Mid Cap Fund and Baroda BNP Paribas Large and Mid Cap Fund- are both in the Large & Mid Cap Fund category, from Bandhan AMC Limited and Baroda BNP Paribas Asset Management India Private Limited respectively. Baroda BNP Paribas Large and Mid Cap Fund- has posted a higher 3-year rolling CAGR. Baroda BNP Paribas Large and Mid Cap Fund- has the lower expense ratio. See the full table and FAQ below for the complete real-data comparison.
Basics
Baroda BNP Paribas Large and Mid Cap Fund- has the lower direct-plan expense ratio, by 0.34 percentage points.
| Bandhan Large & Mid Cap Fund - Direct Plan - Growth | Baroda BNP Paribas Large and Mid Cap Fund- Direct Plan -Growth Option | |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Large & Mid Cap Fund | Large & Mid Cap Fund |
| AMC | Bandhan AMC Limited | Baroda BNP Paribas Asset Management India Private Limited |
| Benchmark | NIFTY LargeMidcap 250 TRI | BSE 250 LargeMidCap Index TRI |
| NAV | ₹156.518 (2026-10-28) | ₹28.4005 (2026-10-28) |
| AUM | ₹20,710.957 Cr | ₹1,741.01 Cr |
| Expense Ratio (Direct) | 1.17% | 0.83% |
| Inception | 2005-06-27 | 2020-08-17 |
Returns
Baroda BNP Paribas Large and Mid Cap Fund- leads on 3-year rolling CAGR (20.3% vs Bandhan Large & Mid Cap Fund's 17.5%) - see the FAQ below for percentile context within each fund's own category.
Risk Metrics
Baroda BNP Paribas Large and Mid Cap Fund- has been the more volatile of the two by standard deviation.
| Bandhan Large & Mid Cap Fund - Direct Plan - Growth | Baroda BNP Paribas Large and Mid Cap Fund- Direct Plan -Growth Option | |
|---|---|---|
| 3Y Sharpe Ratio | 0.54 | 0.30 |
| 3Y Alpha | 5.1947% | 3.9233% |
| 3Y Std Deviation | 14.2159% | 14.6946% |
| 3Y Calmar Ratio | 0.82 | 0.59 |
Portfolio Analytics
Baroda BNP Paribas Large and Mid Cap Fund- carries the higher portfolio YTM.
| Bandhan Large & Mid Cap Fund - Direct Plan - Growth | Baroda BNP Paribas Large and Mid Cap Fund- Direct Plan -Growth Option | |
|---|---|---|
| P/E Ratio | 20.4958 | 29.2438 |
| P/B Ratio | 6.6937 | - |
| Dividend Yield | 1.2634% | 0.9448% |
| Active Share | 57.87% | 65.24% |
| Portfolio Turnover | - | - |
| YTM | 5.75% | 5.8% |
| Duration (Macaulay) | - | - |
Punji Fund Health Score
Baroda BNP Paribas Large and Mid Cap Fund- has the stronger Punji Quality grade of the two.
Frequently asked questions
Which has a higher 3-year return, Bandhan Large & Mid Cap Fund or Baroda BNP Paribas Large and Mid Cap Fund-?
Baroda BNP Paribas Large and Mid Cap Fund-'s 3-year rolling CAGR of 20.3% is higher than Bandhan Large & Mid Cap Fund's 17.5%. Baroda BNP Paribas Large and Mid Cap Fund- sits in the 81st percentile of its category on this metric, versus the 42nd percentile for Bandhan Large & Mid Cap Fund - though note both funds may belong to different categories with different medians, so a raw CAGR comparison doesn't account for how each fund performed relative to its own peers. A higher historical return also doesn't necessarily mean lower risk; check the risk metrics below before concluding either fund is the "better" choice.
Which has a lower expense ratio, Bandhan Large & Mid Cap Fund or Baroda BNP Paribas Large and Mid Cap Fund-?
Baroda BNP Paribas Large and Mid Cap Fund-'s direct-plan expense ratio is 0.34 percentage points lower than Bandhan Large & Mid Cap Fund's. Over long holding periods, a persistent expense-ratio gap compounds into a materially different final corpus even if the two funds' gross returns are similar - it's one of the few fund attributes you can compare with total certainty upfront, unlike future returns, since the fee is contractually fixed rather than a historical estimate.
Which fund carries more risk, Bandhan Large & Mid Cap Fund or Baroda BNP Paribas Large and Mid Cap Fund-?
By standard deviation (a measure of how much a fund's returns swing around its own average), Baroda BNP Paribas Large and Mid Cap Fund- has been more volatile than Bandhan Large & Mid Cap Fund over the trailing window. Standard deviation captures total volatility in both directions - up and down - so a higher figure means bigger swings generally, not necessarily bigger losses specifically. Sharpe ratio (0.54 for Bandhan Large & Mid Cap Fund vs 0.30 for Baroda BNP Paribas Large and Mid Cap Fund-) is a better single measure of risk-adjusted return, since it weighs the return earned per unit of volatility taken rather than volatility alone.
Which has higher AUM, Bandhan Large & Mid Cap Fund or Baroda BNP Paribas Large and Mid Cap Fund-?
Bandhan Large & Mid Cap Fund has ₹20,711 Cr in assets under management, versus ₹1,741 Cr for Baroda BNP Paribas Large and Mid Cap Fund-. A larger AUM generally means deeper liquidity and lower per-unit fixed costs for the AMC to spread across investors, but an AUM that's very large relative to a fund's category and strategy (especially in small/mid cap categories, where the investable universe is smaller) can also make it harder for a manager to enter and exit positions without moving the price - bigger isn't automatically better, especially for less liquid categories.
Which has a higher yield to maturity (YTM), Bandhan Large & Mid Cap Fund or Baroda BNP Paribas Large and Mid Cap Fund-?
Baroda BNP Paribas Large and Mid Cap Fund-'s portfolio YTM (5.8%) is higher than Bandhan Large & Mid Cap Fund's. YTM is the weighted-average return a debt fund's current bond holdings would earn if held to maturity, assuming no defaults and coupons reinvested at the same rate - a useful forward-looking yield estimate for debt funds the way rolling CAGR is for equity funds, though it's an estimate based on today's portfolio, not a guaranteed return, and can move as bonds are bought/sold or as interest rates change.
Which fund has a longer track record, Bandhan Large & Mid Cap Fund or Baroda BNP Paribas Large and Mid Cap Fund-?
Bandhan Large & Mid Cap Fund launched on 2005-06-27, making it older than Baroda BNP Paribas Large and Mid Cap Fund- (launched 2020-08-17). A longer track record means more real market cycles (bull runs, corrections, rate cycles) the fund has actually navigated, which is useful context for judging consistency - but it isn't a guarantee of future performance, and a newer fund isn't automatically worse, especially if it's run by an experienced manager or team with a track record at a prior fund.
Data as of 2026-10-29. Source: AMFI disclosures via Punji. Not investment advice.