COMPARE
Bandhan Crisil Ibx 90 10 SDL Plus Gilt - Sep27 Index Fund - Direct Growth vs UTI Nifty 500 Value 50 Index Fund - Direct Plan - Growth Option
Bandhan Crisil Ibx 90 10 SDL Plus Gilt - Sep27 Index Fund and UTI Nifty 500 Value 50 Index Fund are both in the Index Funds category, from Bandhan AMC Limited and UTI Asset Mgmt. Co. Ltd. respectively. Bandhan Crisil Ibx 90 10 SDL Plus Gilt - Sep27 Index Fund has posted a higher 3-year rolling CAGR. Bandhan Crisil Ibx 90 10 SDL Plus Gilt - Sep27 Index Fund has the lower expense ratio. See the full table and FAQ below for the complete real-data comparison.
Basics
Bandhan Crisil Ibx 90 10 SDL Plus Gilt - Sep27 Index Fund has the lower direct-plan expense ratio, by 0.66 percentage points.
| Bandhan Crisil Ibx 90 10 SDL Plus Gilt - Sep27 Index Fund - Direct Growth | UTI Nifty 500 Value 50 Index Fund - Direct Plan - Growth Option | |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Index Funds | Index Funds |
| AMC | Bandhan AMC Limited | UTI Asset Mgmt. Co. Ltd. |
| Benchmark | CRISIL IBX 90:10 SDL Plus Gilt Index - September 2027 | NIFTY500 Value 50 TRI |
| NAV | ₹13.2035 (2026-10-28) | ₹20.3339 (2026-10-28) |
| AUM | ₹143.661 Cr | ₹828.438 Cr |
| Expense Ratio (Direct) | 0.09% | 0.75% |
| Inception | 2022-11-21 | 2023-04-26 |
Returns
Bandhan Crisil Ibx 90 10 SDL Plus Gilt - Sep27 Index Fund leads on 3-year rolling CAGR (7.7% vs UTI Nifty 500 Value 50 Index Fund's 26.4%) - see the FAQ below for percentile context within each fund's own category.
Risk Metrics
This fund tracks an index, so measuring alpha against that same index would only report its tracking error.
Portfolio Analytics
Punji Fund Health Score
UTI Nifty 500 Value 50 Index Fund has the stronger Punji Quality grade of the two.
Frequently asked questions
Which has a higher 3-year return, Bandhan Crisil Ibx 90 10 SDL Plus Gilt - Sep27 Index Fund or UTI Nifty 500 Value 50 Index Fund?
Bandhan Crisil Ibx 90 10 SDL Plus Gilt - Sep27 Index Fund's 3-year rolling CAGR of 7.7% is higher than UTI Nifty 500 Value 50 Index Fund's 26.4%. Bandhan Crisil Ibx 90 10 SDL Plus Gilt - Sep27 Index Fund sits in the 29th percentile of its category on this metric, versus the 98th percentile for UTI Nifty 500 Value 50 Index Fund - though note both funds may belong to different categories with different medians, so a raw CAGR comparison doesn't account for how each fund performed relative to its own peers. A higher historical return also doesn't necessarily mean lower risk; check the risk metrics below before concluding either fund is the "better" choice.
Which has a lower expense ratio, Bandhan Crisil Ibx 90 10 SDL Plus Gilt - Sep27 Index Fund or UTI Nifty 500 Value 50 Index Fund?
Bandhan Crisil Ibx 90 10 SDL Plus Gilt - Sep27 Index Fund's direct-plan expense ratio is 0.66 percentage points lower than UTI Nifty 500 Value 50 Index Fund's. Over long holding periods, a persistent expense-ratio gap compounds into a materially different final corpus even if the two funds' gross returns are similar - it's one of the few fund attributes you can compare with total certainty upfront, unlike future returns, since the fee is contractually fixed rather than a historical estimate.
Why don't Bandhan Crisil Ibx 90 10 SDL Plus Gilt - Sep27 Index Fund and UTI Nifty 500 Value 50 Index Fund show risk metrics like Sharpe ratio or alpha?
This fund tracks an index, so measuring alpha against that same index would only report its tracking error. This is a deliberate methodology choice, not missing data - risk metrics like alpha and Sharpe ratio are most meaningful for actively-managed funds where a manager makes decisions that can add or subtract value versus a benchmark. For a fund that mechanically tracks an index, the equivalent useful metric is tracking error (how closely it follows its index), not alpha.
Which has higher AUM, Bandhan Crisil Ibx 90 10 SDL Plus Gilt - Sep27 Index Fund or UTI Nifty 500 Value 50 Index Fund?
UTI Nifty 500 Value 50 Index Fund has ₹828 Cr in assets under management, versus ₹144 Cr for Bandhan Crisil Ibx 90 10 SDL Plus Gilt - Sep27 Index Fund. A larger AUM generally means deeper liquidity and lower per-unit fixed costs for the AMC to spread across investors, but an AUM that's very large relative to a fund's category and strategy (especially in small/mid cap categories, where the investable universe is smaller) can also make it harder for a manager to enter and exit positions without moving the price - bigger isn't automatically better, especially for less liquid categories.
Which fund has a longer track record, Bandhan Crisil Ibx 90 10 SDL Plus Gilt - Sep27 Index Fund or UTI Nifty 500 Value 50 Index Fund?
Bandhan Crisil Ibx 90 10 SDL Plus Gilt - Sep27 Index Fund launched on 2022-11-21, making it older than UTI Nifty 500 Value 50 Index Fund (launched 2023-04-26). A longer track record means more real market cycles (bull runs, corrections, rate cycles) the fund has actually navigated, which is useful context for judging consistency - but it isn't a guarantee of future performance, and a newer fund isn't automatically worse, especially if it's run by an experienced manager or team with a track record at a prior fund.
Data as of 2026-10-29. Source: AMFI disclosures via Punji. Not investment advice.