PunjiPUNJI

COMPARE

Axis Retirement Fund - Dynamic Plan - Direct Growth vs ICICI Prudential Retirement Fund - Pure Equity - Direct Plan - Growth Option

Axis Retirement Fund - Dynamic Plan and ICICI Prudential Retirement Fund - Pure Equity are both in the Retirement Fund category, from Axis Asset Management Co. Ltd. and ICICI Prudential Asset Management Company Limited respectively. ICICI Prudential Retirement Fund - Pure Equity has posted a higher 3-year rolling CAGR. ICICI Prudential Retirement Fund - Pure Equity has the lower expense ratio. See the full table and FAQ below for the complete real-data comparison.

Basics

ICICI Prudential Retirement Fund - Pure Equity has the lower direct-plan expense ratio, by 0.46 percentage points.

Axis Retirement Fund - Dynamic Plan - Direct GrowthICICI Prudential Retirement Fund - Pure Equity - Direct Plan - Growth Option
CategoryRetirement FundRetirement Fund
AMCAxis Asset Management Co. Ltd.ICICI Prudential Asset Management Company Limited
BenchmarkCRISIL Hybrid 35+65 - Aggressive IndexNifty 500 TRI
NAV₹20.77 (2026-10-28)₹36.53 (2026-10-28)
AUM₹264.876 Cr₹2,064.909 Cr
Expense Ratio (Direct)1.35%0.89%
Inception2019-11-292019-02-07

Returns

ICICI Prudential Retirement Fund - Pure Equity leads on 3-year rolling CAGR (25.7% vs Axis Retirement Fund - Dynamic Plan's 14.3%) - see the FAQ below for percentile context within each fund's own category.

Risk Metrics

ICICI Prudential Retirement Fund - Pure Equity has been the more volatile of the two by standard deviation.

Portfolio Analytics

ICICI Prudential Retirement Fund - Pure Equity carries the higher portfolio P/E ratio (a rougher proxy for how richly the underlying holdings are valued) - see the table below for the full comparison.

Punji Fund Health Score

ICICI Prudential Retirement Fund - Pure Equity has the stronger Punji Quality grade of the two.

Frequently asked questions

Which has a higher 3-year return, Axis Retirement Fund - Dynamic Plan or ICICI Prudential Retirement Fund - Pure Equity?

ICICI Prudential Retirement Fund - Pure Equity's 3-year rolling CAGR of 25.7% is higher than Axis Retirement Fund - Dynamic Plan's 14.3%. ICICI Prudential Retirement Fund - Pure Equity sits in the 100th percentile of its category on this metric, versus the 63rd percentile for Axis Retirement Fund - Dynamic Plan - though note both funds may belong to different categories with different medians, so a raw CAGR comparison doesn't account for how each fund performed relative to its own peers. A higher historical return also doesn't necessarily mean lower risk; check the risk metrics below before concluding either fund is the "better" choice.

Which has a lower expense ratio, Axis Retirement Fund - Dynamic Plan or ICICI Prudential Retirement Fund - Pure Equity?

ICICI Prudential Retirement Fund - Pure Equity's direct-plan expense ratio is 0.46 percentage points lower than Axis Retirement Fund - Dynamic Plan's. Over long holding periods, a persistent expense-ratio gap compounds into a materially different final corpus even if the two funds' gross returns are similar - it's one of the few fund attributes you can compare with total certainty upfront, unlike future returns, since the fee is contractually fixed rather than a historical estimate.

Which fund carries more risk, Axis Retirement Fund - Dynamic Plan or ICICI Prudential Retirement Fund - Pure Equity?

By standard deviation (a measure of how much a fund's returns swing around its own average), ICICI Prudential Retirement Fund - Pure Equity has been more volatile than Axis Retirement Fund - Dynamic Plan over the trailing window. Standard deviation captures total volatility in both directions - up and down - so a higher figure means bigger swings generally, not necessarily bigger losses specifically. Sharpe ratio (0.21 for Axis Retirement Fund - Dynamic Plan vs 0.59 for ICICI Prudential Retirement Fund - Pure Equity) is a better single measure of risk-adjusted return, since it weighs the return earned per unit of volatility taken rather than volatility alone.

Which has higher AUM, Axis Retirement Fund - Dynamic Plan or ICICI Prudential Retirement Fund - Pure Equity?

ICICI Prudential Retirement Fund - Pure Equity has ₹2,065 Cr in assets under management, versus ₹265 Cr for Axis Retirement Fund - Dynamic Plan. A larger AUM generally means deeper liquidity and lower per-unit fixed costs for the AMC to spread across investors, but an AUM that's very large relative to a fund's category and strategy (especially in small/mid cap categories, where the investable universe is smaller) can also make it harder for a manager to enter and exit positions without moving the price - bigger isn't automatically better, especially for less liquid categories.

Which fund has a longer track record, Axis Retirement Fund - Dynamic Plan or ICICI Prudential Retirement Fund - Pure Equity?

ICICI Prudential Retirement Fund - Pure Equity launched on 2019-02-07, making it older than Axis Retirement Fund - Dynamic Plan (launched 2019-11-29). A longer track record means more real market cycles (bull runs, corrections, rate cycles) the fund has actually navigated, which is useful context for judging consistency - but it isn't a guarantee of future performance, and a newer fund isn't automatically worse, especially if it's run by an experienced manager or team with a track record at a prior fund.

Data as of 2026-10-29. Source: AMFI disclosures via Punji. Not investment advice.