COMPARE
Axis Innovation Fund - Direct Plan - Growth Option vs Axis Momentum Fund - Direct Plan - Growth Option
Axis Innovation Fund and Axis Momentum Fund are both in the Thematic Fund category, from Axis Asset Management Co. Ltd.. Axis Innovation Fund has the lower expense ratio. See the full table and FAQ below for the complete real-data comparison.
Basics
Axis Innovation Fund has the lower direct-plan expense ratio, by 1.05 percentage points.
| Axis Innovation Fund - Direct Plan - Growth Option | Axis Momentum Fund - Direct Plan - Growth Option | |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Thematic Fund | Thematic Fund |
| AMC | Axis Asset Management Co. Ltd. | Axis Asset Management Co. Ltd. |
| Benchmark | Nifty 500 TRI | Nifty 500 TRI |
| NAV | ₹22.26 (2026-10-28) | ₹8.63 (2026-10-28) |
| AUM | ₹1,295.798 Cr | ₹808.756 Cr |
| Expense Ratio (Direct) | 1.35% | 2.4% |
| Inception | 2020-12-04 | 2024-11-22 |
Returns
Risk Metrics
This fund is less than three years old, so a three-year risk history does not exist yet.
Portfolio Analytics
Axis Innovation Fund carries the higher portfolio YTM.
| Axis Innovation Fund - Direct Plan - Growth Option | Axis Momentum Fund - Direct Plan - Growth Option | |
|---|---|---|
| P/E Ratio | 69.3577 | 35.4401 |
| P/B Ratio | - | 15.3738 |
| Dividend Yield | 0.1522% | 0.3805% |
| Active Share | 92.44% | 84.24% |
| Portfolio Turnover | 83% | 363% |
| YTM | 5.28% | 5.2025% |
| Duration (Macaulay) | - | - |
Punji Fund Health Score
Axis Momentum Fund has the stronger Punji Quality grade of the two.
Frequently asked questions
Which has a lower expense ratio, Axis Innovation Fund or Axis Momentum Fund?
Axis Innovation Fund's direct-plan expense ratio is 1.05 percentage points lower than Axis Momentum Fund's. Over long holding periods, a persistent expense-ratio gap compounds into a materially different final corpus even if the two funds' gross returns are similar - it's one of the few fund attributes you can compare with total certainty upfront, unlike future returns, since the fee is contractually fixed rather than a historical estimate.
Why don't Axis Innovation Fund and Axis Momentum Fund show risk metrics like Sharpe ratio or alpha?
This fund is less than three years old, so a three-year risk history does not exist yet. This is a deliberate methodology choice, not missing data - risk metrics like alpha and Sharpe ratio are most meaningful for actively-managed funds where a manager makes decisions that can add or subtract value versus a benchmark. For a fund that mechanically tracks an index, the equivalent useful metric is tracking error (how closely it follows its index), not alpha.
Which has higher AUM, Axis Innovation Fund or Axis Momentum Fund?
Axis Innovation Fund has ₹1,296 Cr in assets under management, versus ₹809 Cr for Axis Momentum Fund. A larger AUM generally means deeper liquidity and lower per-unit fixed costs for the AMC to spread across investors, but an AUM that's very large relative to a fund's category and strategy (especially in small/mid cap categories, where the investable universe is smaller) can also make it harder for a manager to enter and exit positions without moving the price - bigger isn't automatically better, especially for less liquid categories.
Which has a higher yield to maturity (YTM), Axis Innovation Fund or Axis Momentum Fund?
Axis Innovation Fund's portfolio YTM (5.28%) is higher than Axis Momentum Fund's. YTM is the weighted-average return a debt fund's current bond holdings would earn if held to maturity, assuming no defaults and coupons reinvested at the same rate - a useful forward-looking yield estimate for debt funds the way rolling CAGR is for equity funds, though it's an estimate based on today's portfolio, not a guaranteed return, and can move as bonds are bought/sold or as interest rates change.
Which fund has a longer track record, Axis Innovation Fund or Axis Momentum Fund?
Axis Innovation Fund launched on 2020-12-04, making it older than Axis Momentum Fund (launched 2024-11-22). A longer track record means more real market cycles (bull runs, corrections, rate cycles) the fund has actually navigated, which is useful context for judging consistency - but it isn't a guarantee of future performance, and a newer fund isn't automatically worse, especially if it's run by an experienced manager or team with a track record at a prior fund.
Data as of 2026-10-29. Source: AMFI disclosures via Punji. Not investment advice.