PunjiPUNJI

COMPARE

Axis Children's Fund - Lock in - Direct Growth vs SBI Children's Fund - Savings Plan - DIRECT PLAN - GROWTH

Axis Children's Fund - Lock in and SBI Children's Fund - Savings Plan are both in the Children s Fund category, from Axis Asset Management Co. Ltd. and SBI Funds Management Limited respectively. SBI Children's Fund - Savings Plan has posted a higher 3-year rolling CAGR. SBI Children's Fund - Savings Plan has the lower expense ratio. See the full table and FAQ below for the complete real-data comparison.

Basics

SBI Children's Fund - Savings Plan has the lower direct-plan expense ratio, by 0.58 percentage points.

Axis Children's Fund - Lock in - Direct GrowthSBI Children's Fund - Savings Plan - DIRECT PLAN - GROWTH
CategoryChildren s FundChildren s Fund
AMCAxis Asset Management Co. Ltd.SBI Funds Management Limited
BenchmarkNIFTY 50 Hybrid Composite Debt 65:35 Index TRINIFTY 50 Hybrid Composite Debt 15:85 Index
NAV₹28.9693 (2026-10-28)₹128.636 (2026-10-28)
AUM₹854.78 Cr₹149.364 Cr
Expense Ratio (Direct)1.49%0.91%
Inception2015-11-182001-12-28

Returns

SBI Children's Fund - Savings Plan leads on 3-year rolling CAGR (12.7% vs Axis Children's Fund - Lock in's 11.3%) - see the FAQ below for percentile context within each fund's own category.

Risk Metrics

Axis Children's Fund - Lock in has been the more volatile of the two by standard deviation.

Portfolio Analytics

SBI Children's Fund - Savings Plan carries the higher portfolio YTM.

Punji Fund Health Score

SBI Children's Fund - Savings Plan has the stronger Punji Quality grade of the two.

Frequently asked questions

Which has a higher 3-year return, Axis Children's Fund - Lock in or SBI Children's Fund - Savings Plan?

SBI Children's Fund - Savings Plan's 3-year rolling CAGR of 12.7% is higher than Axis Children's Fund - Lock in's 11.3%. SBI Children's Fund - Savings Plan sits in the 55th percentile of its category on this metric, versus the 36th percentile for Axis Children's Fund - Lock in - though note both funds may belong to different categories with different medians, so a raw CAGR comparison doesn't account for how each fund performed relative to its own peers. A higher historical return also doesn't necessarily mean lower risk; check the risk metrics below before concluding either fund is the "better" choice.

Which has a lower expense ratio, Axis Children's Fund - Lock in or SBI Children's Fund - Savings Plan?

SBI Children's Fund - Savings Plan's direct-plan expense ratio is 0.58 percentage points lower than Axis Children's Fund - Lock in's. Over long holding periods, a persistent expense-ratio gap compounds into a materially different final corpus even if the two funds' gross returns are similar - it's one of the few fund attributes you can compare with total certainty upfront, unlike future returns, since the fee is contractually fixed rather than a historical estimate.

Which fund carries more risk, Axis Children's Fund - Lock in or SBI Children's Fund - Savings Plan?

By standard deviation (a measure of how much a fund's returns swing around its own average), Axis Children's Fund - Lock in has been more volatile than SBI Children's Fund - Savings Plan over the trailing window. Standard deviation captures total volatility in both directions - up and down - so a higher figure means bigger swings generally, not necessarily bigger losses specifically. Sharpe ratio (-0.02 for Axis Children's Fund - Lock in vs 0.72 for SBI Children's Fund - Savings Plan) is a better single measure of risk-adjusted return, since it weighs the return earned per unit of volatility taken rather than volatility alone.

Which has higher AUM, Axis Children's Fund - Lock in or SBI Children's Fund - Savings Plan?

Axis Children's Fund - Lock in has ₹855 Cr in assets under management, versus ₹149 Cr for SBI Children's Fund - Savings Plan. A larger AUM generally means deeper liquidity and lower per-unit fixed costs for the AMC to spread across investors, but an AUM that's very large relative to a fund's category and strategy (especially in small/mid cap categories, where the investable universe is smaller) can also make it harder for a manager to enter and exit positions without moving the price - bigger isn't automatically better, especially for less liquid categories.

Which has a higher yield to maturity (YTM), Axis Children's Fund - Lock in or SBI Children's Fund - Savings Plan?

SBI Children's Fund - Savings Plan's portfolio YTM (7.9651%) is higher than Axis Children's Fund - Lock in's. YTM is the weighted-average return a debt fund's current bond holdings would earn if held to maturity, assuming no defaults and coupons reinvested at the same rate - a useful forward-looking yield estimate for debt funds the way rolling CAGR is for equity funds, though it's an estimate based on today's portfolio, not a guaranteed return, and can move as bonds are bought/sold or as interest rates change.

Which has longer duration (more interest-rate sensitivity), Axis Children's Fund - Lock in or SBI Children's Fund - Savings Plan?

SBI Children's Fund - Savings Plan has the longer Macaulay duration of the two, meaning its NAV is more sensitive to interest-rate changes - a longer-duration debt fund tends to gain more when rates fall and lose more when rates rise, compared to a shorter-duration fund. Duration is expressed in years but isn't literally about how long you hold the fund; it's a measure of price sensitivity to rate moves. If you expect rates to fall, the longer-duration fund benefits more; if you expect rates to rise or want to minimize that swing, the shorter-duration fund is the more conservative pick.

Which fund has a longer track record, Axis Children's Fund - Lock in or SBI Children's Fund - Savings Plan?

SBI Children's Fund - Savings Plan launched on 2001-12-28, making it older than Axis Children's Fund - Lock in (launched 2015-11-18). A longer track record means more real market cycles (bull runs, corrections, rate cycles) the fund has actually navigated, which is useful context for judging consistency - but it isn't a guarantee of future performance, and a newer fund isn't automatically worse, especially if it's run by an experienced manager or team with a track record at a prior fund.

Data as of 2026-10-29. Source: AMFI disclosures via Punji. Not investment advice.