COMPARE
ASK Liquid Fund Direct Growth vs Franklin India Liquid Fund - Super Institutional - Direct - Growth
ASK Liquid Fund Direct Growth and Franklin India Liquid Fund - Super Institutional are both in the Liquid Fund category, from ASK Asset Management Private Limited and Franklin Templeton Asset Management (India) Private Limited respectively. ASK Liquid Fund Direct Growth has the lower expense ratio. See the full table and FAQ below for the complete real-data comparison.
Basics
ASK Liquid Fund Direct Growth has the lower direct-plan expense ratio, by 0.05 percentage points.
| ASK Liquid Fund Direct Growth | Franklin India Liquid Fund - Super Institutional - Direct - Growth | |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Liquid Fund | Liquid Fund |
| AMC | ASK Asset Management Private Limited | Franklin Templeton Asset Management (India) Private Limited |
| Benchmark | CRISIL Liquid Debt A-I Index | No benchmark required for this fund category |
| NAV | ₹1009.6548 (2026-10-28) | ₹4301.8913 (2026-10-28) |
| AUM | ₹434.42 Cr | ₹5,659.71 Cr |
| Expense Ratio (Direct) | 0.09% | 0.14% |
| Inception | 2026-08-12 | 1998-04-29 |
Returns
This fund is less than a year old, so there is not yet enough history to calculate rolling returns.
Risk Metrics
Risk metrics aren't shown for debt funds. Their NAV starts near Rs 10 and compounds steadily, so CAGR, beta and drawdown measure the arithmetic rather than the manager.
Portfolio Analytics
Punji Fund Health Score
ASK Liquid Fund Direct Growth and Franklin India Liquid Fund - Super Institutional carry the same Punji Quality grade.
Frequently asked questions
Which has a lower expense ratio, ASK Liquid Fund Direct Growth or Franklin India Liquid Fund - Super Institutional?
ASK Liquid Fund Direct Growth's direct-plan expense ratio is 0.05 percentage points lower than Franklin India Liquid Fund - Super Institutional's. Over long holding periods, a persistent expense-ratio gap compounds into a materially different final corpus even if the two funds' gross returns are similar - it's one of the few fund attributes you can compare with total certainty upfront, unlike future returns, since the fee is contractually fixed rather than a historical estimate.
Why don't ASK Liquid Fund Direct Growth and Franklin India Liquid Fund - Super Institutional show risk metrics like Sharpe ratio or alpha?
Risk metrics aren't shown for debt funds. Their NAV starts near Rs 10 and compounds steadily, so CAGR, beta and drawdown measure the arithmetic rather than the manager. This is a deliberate methodology choice, not missing data - risk metrics like alpha and Sharpe ratio are most meaningful for actively-managed funds where a manager makes decisions that can add or subtract value versus a benchmark. For a fund that mechanically tracks an index, the equivalent useful metric is tracking error (how closely it follows its index), not alpha.
Which has higher AUM, ASK Liquid Fund Direct Growth or Franklin India Liquid Fund - Super Institutional?
Franklin India Liquid Fund - Super Institutional has ₹5,660 Cr in assets under management, versus ₹434 Cr for ASK Liquid Fund Direct Growth. A larger AUM generally means deeper liquidity and lower per-unit fixed costs for the AMC to spread across investors, but an AUM that's very large relative to a fund's category and strategy (especially in small/mid cap categories, where the investable universe is smaller) can also make it harder for a manager to enter and exit positions without moving the price - bigger isn't automatically better, especially for less liquid categories.
Which fund has a longer track record, ASK Liquid Fund Direct Growth or Franklin India Liquid Fund - Super Institutional?
Franklin India Liquid Fund - Super Institutional launched on 1998-04-29, making it older than ASK Liquid Fund Direct Growth (launched 2026-08-12). A longer track record means more real market cycles (bull runs, corrections, rate cycles) the fund has actually navigated, which is useful context for judging consistency - but it isn't a guarantee of future performance, and a newer fund isn't automatically worse, especially if it's run by an experienced manager or team with a track record at a prior fund.
Data as of 2026-10-29. Source: AMFI disclosures via Punji. Not investment advice.