PunjiPUNJI

COMPARE

Arudha Equity Long-Short Fund-Direct Plan-Growth vs qsif Equity Long Short Fund - Growth Option - Direct Plan

Arudha Equity Long-Short Fund- and qsif Equity Long Short Fund are both in the Equity Long-Short Fund category, from Bandhan AMC Limited and Quantum Asset Management Company Private Limited respectively. Arudha Equity Long-Short Fund- has the lower expense ratio. See the full table and FAQ below for the complete real-data comparison.

Basics

Arudha Equity Long-Short Fund- has the lower direct-plan expense ratio, by 1.28 percentage points.

Arudha Equity Long-Short Fund-Direct Plan-Growthqsif Equity Long Short Fund - Growth Option - Direct Plan
CategoryEquity Long-Short FundEquity Long-Short Fund
AMCBandhan AMC LimitedQuantum Asset Management Company Private Limited
BenchmarkNifty 500 TRINifty 500 TRI
NAV₹10.079 (2026-10-28)₹10.8641 (2026-10-28)
AUM--
Expense Ratio (Direct)1.78%3.06%
Inception2026-03-042025-10-08

Returns

This fund is less than a year old, so there is not yet enough history to calculate rolling returns.

Risk Metrics

This fund is less than three years old, so a three-year risk history does not exist yet.

Portfolio Analytics

Punji Fund Health Score

Arudha Equity Long-Short Fund- and qsif Equity Long Short Fund carry the same Punji Quality grade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has a lower expense ratio, Arudha Equity Long-Short Fund- or qsif Equity Long Short Fund?

Arudha Equity Long-Short Fund-'s direct-plan expense ratio is 1.28 percentage points lower than qsif Equity Long Short Fund's. Over long holding periods, a persistent expense-ratio gap compounds into a materially different final corpus even if the two funds' gross returns are similar - it's one of the few fund attributes you can compare with total certainty upfront, unlike future returns, since the fee is contractually fixed rather than a historical estimate.

Why don't Arudha Equity Long-Short Fund- and qsif Equity Long Short Fund show risk metrics like Sharpe ratio or alpha?

This fund is less than three years old, so a three-year risk history does not exist yet. This is a deliberate methodology choice, not missing data - risk metrics like alpha and Sharpe ratio are most meaningful for actively-managed funds where a manager makes decisions that can add or subtract value versus a benchmark. For a fund that mechanically tracks an index, the equivalent useful metric is tracking error (how closely it follows its index), not alpha.

Which fund has a longer track record, Arudha Equity Long-Short Fund- or qsif Equity Long Short Fund?

qsif Equity Long Short Fund launched on 2025-10-08, making it older than Arudha Equity Long-Short Fund- (launched 2026-03-04). A longer track record means more real market cycles (bull runs, corrections, rate cycles) the fund has actually navigated, which is useful context for judging consistency - but it isn't a guarantee of future performance, and a newer fund isn't automatically worse, especially if it's run by an experienced manager or team with a track record at a prior fund.

Data as of 2026-10-29. Source: AMFI disclosures via Punji. Not investment advice.